And? What part of it do you not understand?
And? What part of it do you not understand?
Logic dictates you play to your advantage. The advantage was clearly in using Splitter more since he was hot and destroying the magic frontcourt.
As silverblk mystix alluded to, where is the logic to be found for yanking him out of the game at that point?
Please gives us the goods, mr 2nd Team ALL ST.
It's Pop's logic.
Bruno described Pop's logic.
Bruno did not say he agreed with Pop's logic.
Bruno explicitly said he did not agree with Pop's logic.
Bruno understands the English language better than you.
Then quit calling it logic. It's clearly stupidity.
It clearly fits one of the many definitions of logic.
You're simply ignorant of that fact. Bruno is not.
Clearly.
You guys are just too logical for me. /bow
And I clearly called it stupidity...but refrained from clarifying whose stupidity it was...feeling it was obvious I was referring to Pop.
...but if the shoe fits...
Probably just less hysterical and less ignorant.![]()
Who said anything about your post?
What up Cinderella?![]()
/applaud
see above...
Oh, so do you know what Bruno means by logic or not?
Of course not...I never claimed to be as smart as a Popologist.
See what I mean, Bruno?
Good to see that you have some sense.
Thanks for showing up, 2nd teamer. Do we have a 3rd teamer ready? Manu4tres?
Thanks for being an ignorant ass, and for being wrong.
Again.
It is good that you showed up here dumpster, it gives me a little more respect for you and it is good that you are fully admitting to being a first team Popologist...
I haven't forgotten how much you defended Bonners minutes over Splitter and Dice all last season...
you pretty much gloated and ridiculed people because the Spurs and Pop posted an impressive regular season record...
then the Memphis massacre happened....and Pop scrambled to throw Splitter into the fire...and all the Popologists...began throwing excuses (Manu, RJ, etc...) like crazy...
Good to see you owning up.![]()
In your misreading of Bruno's point, you guys just proved once again how little you understand.
explanation < > endorsement
Never has.
You'll never stem your vaginal flow enough to realize that.
Seriously, you guys got owned in English usage by a Frenchman.
Nobody got owned, 2nd team.
The disagreement we have is in using the word "logic" in regards to Pop's subs ution patterns. At best, there is little rhyme or reason to them, other than Bruno's sophistic explanation that Bonner being a 3pt shooting big himself is therefore best able to cover another 3pt shooting big.
Sorry, it's logic. The term was appropriate and properly used.
You were just ignorant of that definition.
Bruno owned you. Decisively.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)