Reply With Quote
Is Ron Paul going to be booed again tonight for talking about the golden rule in the CNN debate?
So you're old?
Is Ron Paul going to be booed again tonight for talking about the golden rule in the CNN debate?
I'm on your mind too much.
It's ok for you to every once in a while take a break from your computer and have a life, or at least to not sabatoge threads with personal attacks. That ongoing behavior lowers the bar worse than it already is in this forum.
Look, all I said is you are quite full of yourself. That's apparent from your continued pimping of your thread. You want everyone to think like you and you despise them when they don't.
Sorry, but it's true from where I'm sitting. If you can't take it, you don't have to respond to me.
No, you despise everyone who doesn't think like YOU. That's very apparent. You can't convince me that a President blowing up innocent babies is a good man, when he knows he's done it and shows no remorse for it. I bump that thread because that's part of the root of the problem, period, we all pretend that this stuff isn't happening, including You. You are right about something though. I don't have to respond to you. I don't like talking to liars anyway. Bye.
I thank God every day people don't think like me.I'm not trying to convince you of anything.You can't convince me that a President blowing up innocent babies is a good man, when he knows he's done it and shows no remorse for it.Well, that's simply bull . You're making up now.I bump that thread because that's part of the root of the problem, period, we all pretend that this stuff isn't happening, including You.You just like being a liar.You are right about something though. I don't have to respond to you. I don't like talking to liars anyway. Bye.
Go bump your thread again.
can't wait to see the debate
oh wait, no Perry
That's a response.
Thanks for re-bumping lol
just ignore him SA.
he will eventually go find someone else to play his question or strawman games with.
Also a response lolThanks for re-bumping lol
"Rule breaking straight shooter" and "the right guy" aren't synonymous. I appreciate Paul's unconventional approach, I genuinely do, but not enough to ignore the fact that there are a number of his policies with which I fundamentally (and in some cases quite vehemently) disagree.
He isn't some white night. He is a politician. He will put pork in a bill he is against and votes against. I think he would be a way better president than Obama. But he is what they all are: politician. I would rather have him as the Speaker of the house, or what Palin is doing by being in the sidelines and weilding power.
I appreciate that they yelled for him to get time
I can understand disagreeing with his positions, but damn, doesn't his integrity vs everyone else NOT having any damn integrity stand for something? I guess not. So we only have ourselves to blame.
Ron Paul's EPA-less libertarian USA, foreseen in China (Repugs aim to kill EPA,too)
Chinese 'Cancer Village' Takes Alleged Polluters to Court
Nothing in Wu Wenyong's rural childhood hinted he would end up on a hospital bed aged 15, battling two kinds of cancer.
HIGH EXPOSURE
The chromium-6 levels in the water were 200 times above the permissible limits, Ma Tianjie of Greenpeace in China said after
an independent investigation was conducted.
Enforcement of laws regulating the disposal of chromium is poor. Greenpeace's Ma estimates there are 1 million tonnes of chromium-6 dumped across China that still has not been disposed of, based on environment ministry data.
Virtually every resident of the villages knew of someone who contracted cancer after the industrial park was set up about seven years ago. No epidemiological studies have been conducted.
Studies have shown that exposure to chromium-6 causes leukemia and cancer of the stomach, liver and breast.
"It is one of the worst chemicals to get in drinking water,"
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/0...80F0RH20120116
I means a great deal to me. Wish integrity meant something to others.
Nothing here relevant against Paul. Libertarians do believe in accountability.
It is some of Paul's policies that are too radical for me. Yes, integrity stands for something for if I disagree with too many of your policies then integrity alone is not enough.
"integrity stand for something"
his so-called integrity doesn't excuse his socioopathic, destructive policies.
What "integrity" is used in wanting to kill govt regs that protect Human-Americans health, their lands, water, air, from monopolistic corporate consolidation and its inevitable abuse?
Being wrong over and over, consistently, is "integrity"?
US Cons ution 101: Criminal and civil laws were deliberately left to the states.
This video is enough for me to know not to vote for the s bag Dems or the crazy right.
Anyone who is familiar with my posts should know that I'm probably the most vocal in this forum when it comes to defending the poorest of the poor, that's just in my blood. I really disagree with Ron Pauls stances on what to do with the poor, I hate them (Although ending the Fed is frickin AWESOME!!).
But watching these blown up children...come on man, what's worse, trying to get our poor people help with food and things like that (considering Pauls want to end their programs) and stop other kids from being blown up overseas; or keep the programs that will still deteriorate anyway (considering Obama gives the Repugs whatever they want anyway cause he's a corporate bought spineless pussy), and just continue the murder of children and civilians?
Last edited by SA210; 01-23-2012 at 11:57 AM.
Oliver Stone would vote for Ron Paul over Obama
Filmmaker Oliver Stone, known for his liberal political views, said he would vote for GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul over President Obama should Paul win the Republican nomination.
In an interview with Rock Cellar magazine, Stone was asked if an economic collapse would lead to the fall of the American “empire.”
“I think it’s a given,” Stone said. “There’s no way that we can continue this spending spree. In fact, I think in many ways the most interesting candidate — I’d even vote for him if he was running against Obama — is Ron Paul. Because he’s the only one of anybody who’s saying anything intelligent about the future of the world.”
Stone was a vocal supporter of the president in 2008, and wrote an editorial in the Guardian saying that Obama could be the “heir to John F. Kennedy.”I guess that's out the window
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...resident-obama
You really want to pimp the support of Oliver Stone?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions