So once again Bonner gets more minutes than Tiago

[TJastal]

Sorry, it's logic. The term was appropriate and properly used.

You were just ignorant of that definition.

Bruno owned you.

Splitter is proving himself quite nimble and able to defend even perimeter players. There really isn't any rhyme or reason to the subs ution. Unless I'm missing something. Give us the goods, 2nd team.

[shraediggz]

Fire Pop.
Waive Bonner.
And all is right in the Spurs world again.

You forgot to throw RJ under the bus...

[ChumpDumper]

Splitter is proving himself quite nimble and able to defend even perimeter players. There really isn't any rhyme or reason to the subs ution. Unless I'm missing smoething. Give us the goods, 2nd team.

They have already been given.

You're missing something.

[Bruno]

[biskvito]

You know they say as you get old you just don't give a anymore.

[jjktkk]

You're missing something.

[Dex]

Just to offer a different perspective on this cluster of an argument....logic can be a relative term. What's "logical" for person A may not be "logical" for person B, but it's still person A's "logic".

Since we apparently have to go as far as busting out definitions...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/logic

log·ic
   [loj-ik]
noun
...
2.
a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic.

Whether you agree or disagree with Pop's logic, it's still Pop's logic. You may think its stupidity...but that's not even your logic, that's another English word called "opinion".

I sincerely hope we don't have to break down "opinion" next.

[TJastal]

They have already been given.

You're missing something.

Oh right, it's called logic. You and Bruno like to use that word to describe Pop's thought process.

Like how he needed Bonner in the game to guard Anderson because Bonner shoots 3's too.

[TJastal]

You don't even know what the your laughing at, do you?

[z0sa]

2.
a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic.

take a real close look at this one, tjastal

[ChumpDumper]

Oh right, it's called logic. You and Bruno like to use that word to describe Pop's thought process.

Like how he needed Bonner in the game to guard Anderson because Bonner shoots 3's too.

You were actually missing an explicit explanation that was spoon fed to you.

Now, Dex just shoved it down your throat.

Are you going to spit it out again?

[jjktkk]

Just to offer a different perspective on this cluster of an argument....logic can be a relative term. What's "logical" for person A may not be "logical" for person B, but it's still person A's "logic".

Since we apparently have to go as far as busting out definitions...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/logic

log·ic
   [loj-ik]
noun
...
2.
a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic.

Whether you agree or disagree with Pop's logic, it's still Pop's logic. You may think its stupidity...but that's not even your logic, that's another English word called "opinion".

I sincerely hope we don't have to break down "opinion" next.

You might have to, stay tuned.

[ChumpDumper]

You don't even know what the your laughing at, do you?

I'm thinking he does.

[silverblk mystix]

What else can Popologists do?
Just play the semantics game since their defense of Bonner over Splitter was exposed last season and this season so far...

Just keep defending the insane coach...and keep worrying about semantics...

[ChumpDumper]

So do you understand what Bruno meant by logic?

Yes or no.

[jjktkk]

You don't even know what the your laughing at, do you?

Now your a mindreader too. . Okay I'll clarify my laughter: I'm laughing at you. Feel better now?

[TJastal]

What else can Popologists do?
Just play the semantics game since their defense of Bonner over Splitter was exposed last season and this season so far...

Just keep defending the insane coach...and keep worrying about semantics...

Pretty sad when the 1st and 2nd team All ST resort to semantics to make themselves believe they have won an argument.

I'm sure they will continue to "see" Pop's "logic". Next time Matt Bonner is subbed into the game for Splitter to guard that perimeter 4 I'm sure they'll be saying "See! I can see why Pop did that. We needed Matt Bonner to guard that perimeter guy!"

[ChumpDumper]

Pretty sad when the 1st and 2nd team All ST resort to semantics to make themselves believe they have won an argument.

I'm sure they will continue to "see" Pop's "logic". Next time Matt Bonner is subbed into the game to guard that perimeter 4 I'm sure they'll be saying "See! I can see why Pop did that. We needed Matt Bonner to guard that perimeter guy!"

You still have no understanding of what Bruno said.

[silverblk mystix]

So do you understand what Bruno meant by logic?

Yes or no.

Yes.
What's not to understand? Is logic now supposed to be something complicated?

Do you understand that I said that this was not logic-that it was stupidity that Pop was guilty of?

Yes or No.

[z0sa]

The only logic that exists is my own.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes.
What's not to understand? Is logic now supposed to be something complicated?

Do you understand that I said that this was not logic-that it was stupidity that Pop was guilty of?

Yes or No.

I understand what you were trying to say. Unfortunately, you were wrong because you didn't know the definition of the word logic.

Made you look stupid tbh.

[silverblk mystix]

I understand what you were trying to say. Unfortunately, you were wrong because you didn't know the definition of the word logic.

Made you look stupid tbh.

So where is this lack of understanding of the word logic that I allegedly failed to understand?

[ChumpDumper]

So where is this lack of understanding of the word logic that I allegedly failed to understand?

You just showed it again.

[ChumpDumper]

I gotta hand it to Bruno, he clowned the out of these guys while actually agreeing with them.

[jjktkk]

Pretty sad when, over the top, drama queens, like myself and silverblk mystix, can't get people on here to see what a idiot of a coach Pop is.