No one ever said it had to be good or sound.
You guys still don't get it?
I'd post another emoticon but this is just getting sad.
Really.
Maybe it is you that does not understand what logic is.
Owned yourself here didn't you genius.
You remind me of the guy who walks around with a t-shirt that says: JENIUS...![]()
No one ever said it had to be good or sound.
You guys still don't get it?
I'd post another emoticon but this is just getting sad.
Jenius!
And I'd wager a guy who purposely wears a shirt with the word "JENIUS" knows the correct spelling.
It this your way of admitting I'm right?
I can live with taht.
Not quite sure I follow you. Where does it say it doesn't need to be good or sound?
I'm sure you don't follow me.In the definitions without the words "good" or "sound" in them.Where does it say it doesn't need to be good or sound?
I think some of you are equating "logic" and "logical". Anyone using any kind of process to come up with some solution or course of action can be said to be using logic. No matter how insane the decision or outcome may seem. The logic may not be logical.
This what you're referring to?There wasn't much logic in her move.
That's an example, not a definition.
Sheesh.
"I'm really proud of you dumpster...besides Matty & Mike Finley..no one really believes in me anymore. Keep fighting for me son. Love you."
I don't know if I buy that. The very defenition of the word states otherwise. Logic must have some sound roots, if I'm reading it right.
We may just have to take Dex's advice and just admit that nobody can fathom Pop's logic.
With a few notable exceptions that is.
Then the phrases "flawed logic" and "bad logic" would have no meaning whatsoever if the logic is sound and good by definition.
There was bad sound judgment in her actions.
I'm good with this.
Bruno was clearly using something like definition 2, which had been pointed out to you pages ago.
You are now free to act like you discovered it yourself.
If Bruno would have used either of those terms instead to describe Pop's thinking I don't think we'd be having this discussion.
By omitting those adjectives he invokes the base meaning of the word IMO, which is by defenition something of sound nature.
Pop is trying to get Bonner some face time before the trade deadline.
Except when it's not necessarily sound by definition, a definition you posted yourself.
You overreacted to someone you actually agreed with because you were ignorant of that definition, and look like a fool for doing so.
Bonner would be cut by 29/30 coaches. He's not even better than Brian Cardinal who's the 13th man on the Mavs.
Coincidentally, I was just looking at Cardinal's salary
Cardinal: 1.35m
Mahinmi: 900k
----------------------
Total: 2.25m
Bonner: 3.3m
Makes me wonder just what in the Pop was smoking when he signed Bonner.
ummm..
he was using logic
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)