Reply With Quote
Leonard >>>>>> Hill.
Just thought we should give our man props for winning that game for Indiana yesterday. Could have used that play against the Kings last night
Fast forward to 1:37 mark.
Leonard >>>>>> Hill.
Hmm, maybe a play where he didn't get the benefit of a no call would have been better.
Leonard's the real deal.
I didn't say anything about Leonard...
Last edited by WeNeedLength; 01-21-2012 at 02:11 PM.
Road play was always Goerge's achilees heel, looks like he's crossed that bridge.
good for Hill but did he kick the ball?Just thought we should give our man props for winning that game for Indiana yesterday. Could have used that play against the Kings last night
Fast forward to 1:37 mark.
More like Ellis tried to crossover and dribbled it off Hill's foot. Hill made no attempt to put his foot on the ball, but I'm not sure if that's actually considereed a kick ball in that type of scenario or notl. Heck, I've seen offensive players dribble the ball off their own foot and run to retrieve it, no violation called.
Per the technical rules, I wouldn't call that a kick ball. However, it's like a 50-50 call for the refs, as that's the kind of play that they would call even though it isn't really.
If it took this long to start a thread about missing Hill after a loss....
I don't see anyone saying that. The thread is just giving props to the man for winning the game for his team.
This thread sure seems to be stirring up alot of butthurt.
You've already proved you don't understand the English language.I don't see anyone saying that. The thread is just giving props to the man for winning the game for his team.
This thread sure seems to be stirring up alot of butthurt.
Just thought we should give our man props for winning that game for Indiana yesterday. Could have used that play against the Kings last night
Fast forward to 1:37 mark.
Good show for Hill. It's good to see him finding his footing in a Pacers uniform.
I'm sure Pop is smiling somewhere - maybe even still praising Hill as being a "lockdown defender".
Doesn't say anything about missing Hill.You've already proved you don't understand the English language.
We understand you don't understand.
Hey I'm just pointing out the facts to you, nowhere in his post does he specifcally mention missing George Hill.We understand you don't understand.
Saying we could have used a certain play from a certain game does not equate.
I think Pop's legacy will be much like Larry Brown's (without the team jumping). They will be thought of as teachers, and their students will saturate the NBA.
Hey, I'm just pointing out to you the fact that you don't understand the English language.
It's nothing new.
Neat, glad he's doing well in Indiana.
Don't care what you believe aobut me, I'm just telling you he never mentioned Hill specifically, just that we needed a play like Hill's. So keep biitching and moaning about it. It's funny.Hey, I'm just pointing out to you the fact that you don't understand the English language.
It's nothing new.
Of course you care what I believe about you. You and moan about it all the time. It's funny.
Good for Hill. It's about time someone started a thread about missing his play.
I wonder how close TJastal's mother came to aborting him. I assume it's a decision she regrets.
Classy.
You've established you don't understand.
No need to repeat yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
