Reply With Quote
Very appropriate to screw him, as Ron Paul wants to screw America.
He's a loser, always has been, and always will be, no matter how the votes are (mis)counted.
Iowa vote fraud official
It’s official, or is it? Once again the establishment is showing it’s cards in an obvious attempt to defraud Ron Paul from the nomination, as Iowa GOP ‘officials’ purposely disrupt and permanently invalidate the 2012 Iowa Caucus.
The official Caucus website, in conjunction with the Des Moines Register, had to come forward Thursday to claim the official results can “never be certified” after 8 different precincts turn up invalid results due to “missing votes” and changing stories.
For the first time in history, the Iowa GOP decided to change the final vote count to a “Secret location” for what was claimed to be “security concerns.” The unprecedented change in venue came as a shock to most Iowans who are used to seeing the final results tallied at State Party Headquarters in Des Moines, in full view of the public.
What played out as a result was a mockery of democracy as Iowa election officials permanently skewed the results of the caucus, illegally miscounting and completely dismissing votes for Ron Paul, many of which were ironically from precincts that Romney lost in ’08.
Other missing or “uncounted” votes were expected to be heavy Ron Paul supporting, major populated areas and college town precincts, now leaving the true winner forever in question.
Additionally, Iowa’s establishment politicians now say 121,503 people voted overall, strangely down from the 122,255 it had originally reported. This could be due to new official results not including the 8 precincts that showed skewed results in the new final totals, but the truth may never be fully understood.
As if that’s not odd enough, hidden within all the commotion, even though many votes were missing, uncounted, and changed, including the official result totals for both Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, no mention at all has been given to the new total Ron Paul should now have and if his votes were also miscounted or left out like the two ‘front-runners” votes were reported to have been. Especially considering how close Ron Paul came to winning, one would think his totals would be just as important to review as well.
The Ron Paul camp, as usual, has downplayed the situation for fear of being an easy target and giving the establishment an excuse to label him and his supporters conspiracy "theorists," a very common tactic used by the establishment and it's media throughout Paul’s career. Instead, he’s tried to remain humble and look at the bright side in saying, "a strong third is still pretty good and still sends a message to the establishment and the American people."
lot more here: http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-i...fraud-official
Very appropriate to screw him, as Ron Paul wants to screw America.
He's a loser, always has been, and always will be, no matter how the votes are (mis)counted.
So you are for fraud in democratic elections.
Good to know where you stand and where you are coming from.
everyone was in on it
It's official: nobody cares
another one for fraud. No wonder they thought they can get away with it.
We can not seem to have an election for anything these days without fraud occurring. I find it mildly amusing that the GOP keeps focusing on things like voter ID to fix the fraud problem when the real transgressions occur with the election officials. There is a great line from Gangs of New York where a corrupt politician points out that the voters don't matter, the vote counters do.
party primaries aren't elections, and should be extrapolated state and federal elections.
The GOP definitely doesn't care about nominating or hyping a fiscally sound, morally stable individual who thinks throwing trillions of dollars away on war is a bad idea.
I hate many of the decisions Obama has been making in office lately, and I would vote for him over Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich without a second thought. Put Ron Paul on the 2012 ticket and I'm voting GOP.
So it's not official.
so it's ok to rig them?
"For the first time in history, the Iowa GOP decided to change the final vote count to a “Secret location” for what was claimed to be “security concerns.” The unprecedented change in venue came as a shock to most Iowans who are used to seeing the final results tallied at State Party Headquarters in Des Moines, in full view of the public."
I'm sure loyal democrats like you believe that. I'll bet the democrat election employees who screwed with the ballots believed they were doing the right thing too.
What is your evidence they were Democrats?
Educated guess.
Ever see the statistics of government employees who are paper pushers? Mostly liberal democrats.
Also followed the antics going on during the 2004 Washington State Elections in King County.
Funny the way they kept finding more votes to make a governor.
So you just lied.
Nothing I have seen suggests this was anything other than a purely Republican party exercise.
You'll have to prove otherwise, WC.
so did you regarding Rand Paul and profiling dark foreigns.
Nope. It's all there.
You lie in pretty much every thread you start, including this one.
where? provide a link or quote thanks.
Already done.
By you, of all people.
Sorry you missed it.
You're welcome.
Nothing there about profiling dark foreigners.
so you lied. thanks.
Nope, there was. You showed us.
So you're not intelligent. Thanks.
you're lying. post the link otherwise.
pretty easy to clear your name if you were not lying imo. too bad you are
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
