To all Executive Committee members.

[Giuseppe]

Of course.

[midnightpulp]

Of course.

This is the favor I want.

You'll post on lakaluva's profile page (this profile page: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=11493) requesting him to pay DeadlyDynasty and Midnightpulp the 200 US Dollars a piece he owes them (us). You will use the following text (you may use your own words as long as you don't corrupt the original meaning of the message): "lakaluva, pay DeadlyDynasty (forum profile: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=15365) and midnightpulp (forum profile: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=5430) the 200.00 US Dollars each you owe them. Do this for me, your friend Culburn."

Starting tonight, you'll post the above message twice a day, every day and only stop until lakaluva pays both DeadlyDynasty and midnightpulp 200.00 US Dollars each. The message has to be written and posted in English and you are not allowed to edit or otherwise obscure the clarity of the message with such things as white text on a white background, black text on a black background or any two similar color combinations. Only black, legible fonts (Times New Roman, Arial, etc) on a white background are permitted. It has to be clearly legible and publicly available so that any visitor to lakauva's profile page can read it.

If lakaluva should restrict the ability to receive profile comments, then you must address him publicly in the NBA forum, replying to his posts by the parameters set forth in the first and second paragraphs using the aforementioned message in the above text, first paragraph.

Agreed?

[Giuseppe]

This is the favor I want.

You'll post on lakaluva's profile page (this profile page: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=11493) requesting him to pay DeadlyDynasty and Midnightpulp the 200 US Dollars a piece he owes them (us). You will use the following text (you may use your own words as long as you don't corrupt the original meaning of the message): "lakaluva, pay DeadlyDynasty (forum profile: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=15365) and midnightpulp (forum profile: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=5430) the 200.00 US Dollars each you owe them. Do this for me, your friend Culburn."

Starting tonight, you'll post the above message twice a day, every day and only stop until lakaluva pays both DeadlyDynasty and midnightpulp 200.00 US Dollars each. The message has to be written and posted in English and you are not allowed to edit or otherwise obscure the clarity of the message with such things as white text on a white background, black text on a black background or any two similar color combinations. Only black, legible fonts (Times New Roman, Arial, etc) on a white background are permitted. It has to be clearly legible and publicly available so that any visitor to lakauva's profile page can read it.

If lakaluva should restrict the ability to receive profile comments, then you must address him publicly in the NBA forum, replying to his posts by the parameters set forth in the first and second paragraphs using the aforementioned message in the above text, first paragraph.

Agreed?

That's not within my power.

Pick somethin' else.

[midnightpulp]

That's not within my power.

Pick somethin' else.

That is well within your power. Prove it isn't?

[Giuseppe]

That is well within your power. Prove it isn't?

No. It's not.

Pick something else.

[midnightpulp]

No. It's not.

Pick something else.

You already said it is within your power to post messages on profile pages, did you not?

[Giuseppe]

You already said it is within your power to post messages on profile pages, did you not?

Yes.

[Fpoonsie]

If lakaluva should restrict the ability to receive profile comments, then you must address him publicly in the NBA forum, replying to his posts by the parameters set forth in the first and second paragraphs using the aforementioned message in the above text, first paragraph.

Just to play devil's advocate here for a sec, wouldn't the repe ive responses to Luva go against your PREVIOUS (and now approved) Clutter Reduction Bill?

[midnightpulp]

Yes.

lakaluva's page is a profile page. I'm requesting you post a message on his page. Thus, it's within your power as stated.

Are you reneging on our deal then?

[Giuseppe]

Just to play devil's advocate here for a sec, wouldn't the repe ive responses to Luva go against your PREVIOUS (and now approved) Clutter Reduction Bill?

tee, hee.

[Giuseppe]

lakaluva's page is a profile page. I'm requesting you post a message on his page. Thus, it's within your power as stated.

Are you reneging on our deal then?

No. I'm not.

[midnightpulp]

Just to play devil's advocate here for a sec, wouldn't the repe ive responses to Luva go against your PREVIOUS (and now approved) Clutter Reduction Bill?

No. Because he's required to only post two replies per day. The CRA protects against excessive repe ion in the space of minutes.

[midnightpulp]

tee, hee.

Explain to me how it's not within your power to post on his page when you clearly stated it is within your power to post on profile pages?

[Giuseppe]

Explain to me how it's not within your power to post on his page when you clearly stated it is within your power to post on profile pages?

I don't have to explain anything to you.

I gave you the ground rules last night. It is not within my power.

Pick something else.

[Fpoonsie]

No. Because he's required to only post two replies per day. The CRA protects against excessive repe ion in the space of minutes.

Still seems to spit in tha respective face of the CRA to INSIST upon repe ion, despite the volume, or lack thereof.

[midnightpulp]

Still seems to spit in tha respective face of the CRA to INSIST upon repe ion, despite the volume, or lack thereof.

Repe ion is allowed. But not excessive repe ion within a specific time frame. There's a difference. If the CRA shoehorned everyone into being 100% original in every post they make, it'd be a draconian, impractical law that would no doubt trigger a revolt.

[Giuseppe]

Repe ion is allowed. But not excessive repe ion within a specific time frame. There's a difference. If the CRA shoehorned everyone into being 100% original in every post they make, it'd be a draconian, impractical law that would no doubt trigger a revolt.

tee, hee.

[midnightpulp]

Culburn. Who said this?:

"My ass. You wanted to bury the hatchet with Cubby. Treat me quality. But, then Kori-girl caught me tiptoeing naked thru the tulips and nicked my tuck just after you sent me those dozen roses. You didn't think I saw, but, I did. I was hopin' you would take the high road and not renege, but, your sorry ass showed it's true colors.

Nothin' new. Orlando winning in OH., makes playing Bryant this afternoon meaningless and reckless. Just rest him 'till Sacramento and the Clips then play him 20 minutes a game. Same with Odom, Artest, Fish and Gasol.

Ya pinheaded twerp, you."

[redzero]

Culburn asking people to not take Koolaid_Man and lakaluva's welshing personally

Biggest hypocrite in SpursTalk history. This dude gets into the middle of a bet that has nothing to do with him in the first place, and then he rubs in the fact that his pal didn't pay up. Now that he wants something, he's begging people to forget that the bet ever happened, even though he loved bringing it up before.

this dude rarely practices what he preaches

[Giuseppe]

Now that he wants something, he's begging people to forget that the bet ever happened, even though he loved bringing it up before.

Never said such.

[m>s]

there's one vacant seat in the committee now that mono is out FOREVER, who's gonna supplant the picklebreath in the committee?

[Koolaid_Man]

bump....Kool showing why he's the first black man to own white slaves......this thread is a classic