Reply With Quote
Foul on Blue....Wade 2 more shots please...
and Barkley, and Malone,and Drexler
but neither had teams like the Lakers and C's of the 80s
but still 6 rings in 8 years, 2 3peats as the man is great
Foul on Blue....Wade 2 more shots please...
2006 NBA Finals ref:
All you know is points total and YouTubeKobe over Dwhistler all day ere day
some additional facts ..
Kobe - 16 seasons - 28,689 points at age 33
Wade - 8 seasons - 14,329 points at age 30
how in the at 30 will Wade catch Kobe....
let's carry on:
Rings without Shaq
Kobe 2
Wade 0
Wade injury prone doesn't play through injuries like Kobe does.
watch how Kobe shuts these niggras down:
even though the refs cheated in 2006, the whistler is still the better player all time on my list.
You guys blew that championship away,and resort to blaming the refs like the '02 kings fans and '10 celtics fans to feel better about it
no
up 2-0, in game 3 up 13 in the 4th quarter
If that isn't blowing a championship away then I dont know what is
Wade = better series
Kobe = better player
Kobe = better career
You're either trolling or lying or both, tbh.
2001 Kobe would on Wade. He knows it and so do you.
Not me. That same Dallas team that choked away a 2-0 lead? IIRC, Kobe ted on them one game that same year - outscoring the Mavs by himself 62-61. He then sat out of the 4th quarter.
In other words, Kobe would have destroyed them in the Finals too if he were on the Heat in 2006, tbh.
Kool is so butthurt in this thread. Better have luva come over and lap up your anal leakage. It's Valentine's Day after all.
HH didn't say one series. He said for one season(which I think he meant playoffs also) and 2006 Wade was incredible and Kobe was dominant in 2001, played incredible in the Western conference finals. I would take Wade though for beating a Piston's team not many thought they would beat and having one of the best finals for any player ever.
This really is a hard choice.
Kobe.
Unless you're taking Wade AND Bennett Salvatore.
I hear what you trying to say, but Kobe ted on a superior defensive team. We know what he did in only 3 quarters of work that same year against the Mavs.
In the two games the Heat played the Spurs, here is what D-Whistle did:
Game 1: 31 points. Impressive. Or was it? He shot 15-17 FTs
Game 2: 36 points. Impressive. Or was it? He shot 15-29. It took him 29 shots to get his 36 (you know, the same many on ST clown Kobe about) Shaq played this one.
The difference? Spurs swept the Heat that year. You know, the same year that the Heat won the NBA le. Also the same year Kobe dropped 62 on the Mavs (Finals runner up, or last loser - however you want to call it).
So please don't overrate Wade more than he already is. Don't let me pull Kool's YouTube vids of what Kobe did to the same Spur team that swept the Heat. No need to flip a coin. Kobe's career s on Wade's. Kobe is a more skilled player than Wade is too. Kobe's jumper is better than Wade's too.
Problem with Kobe is that his numbers are always skewed by him being inconsistant as . I would take 2001 Kobe, though, because he could just go off and tear teams a new one
Spur Fans would agree with that
http://www.basketball-reference.com/..._2001_WCF.html
props for duncan averaging over 4 blocks per game though
Kobe is one y bas with ice in his veins. It's a blessing and a curse. There are many variables that contribute to his sometimes ty shooting percentages. Some his fault (shooting 1 on 3 with varying success), some not his fault (giving him the ball with < 4 seconds on the clock near the 3 point line with 2 defenders draped over him). The defense is designed to make Luke Walton, or Kwame Brown, or Chris Mihm beat them. In Kobe's defense, would you pass in that situation? Exactly. I wouldn't either.
Kobe.. at age 22 too. He was ridiculous all season long but really peaked in the playoffs.
Kobe at 22 was a better shooter than Wade is now.
Great point. Wade was amazing but some shaky calls were a big part of it.
You guys have convinced me ...Kobe. and I rarely reverse field, but can admit when I am wrong.
I'd take Kobe in a heartbeat. Their numbers are close and I like Kobe's all around game better than Wade's. Don't have the numbers off hand, but it sure seemed like Wade got a lot more free throws than Kobe did in 2001. The '01 Conference Finals were a massacre. Even after winning three les the scars from that wound haven't completely healed. I have been a fan of Wade since he booted Kentucky out of the NCAA tournament in college, but Kobe is the second best shooting guard of all time and the 2001 playoffs is one of his finer performances.
thanks for coming in here and talking sense to some of these recent Laker fans who obviously started watching basketball in 2005.I hear what you trying to say, but Kobe ted on a superior defensive team. We know what he did in only 3 quarters of work that same year against the Mavs.
In the two games the Heat played the Spurs, here is what D-Whistle did:
Game 1: 31 points. Impressive. Or was it? He shot 15-17 FTs
Game 2: 36 points. Impressive. Or was it? He shot 15-29. It took him 29 shots to get his 36 (you know, the same many on ST clown Kobe about) Shaq played this one.
The difference? Spurs swept the Heat that year. You know, the same year that the Heat won the NBA le. Also the same year Kobe dropped 62 on the Mavs (Finals runner up, or last loser - however you want to call it).
So please don't overrate Wade more than he already is. Don't let me pull Kool's YouTube vids of what Kobe did to the same Spur team that swept the Heat. No need to flip a coin. Kobe's career s on Wade's. Kobe is a more skilled player than Wade is too. Kobe's jumper is better than Wade's too.
I'm not butthurt at all...I'm just doing my thug thizzle...this ignorant ass thread / conversation I find amusing...it's a clear case of the blind leading the blind...I don't want no parts of it...only to spite...I'm having fun
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
