Congrats to the Black Sea!!! The Arctic ocean, on the other hand.........
Indeed.
You obviously don't understand the process, Agloco.
Congrats to the Black Sea!!! The Arctic ocean, on the other hand.........
You obviously don't understand the process, Agloco.
You do this every winter and every year after the aggregate data is ac ulated you are made to look like an asshat once again. Whats another year, I guess.
Pretty funny how known of you climategate twits felt the need to post about the Heartland ins utes files this week. Par for the course.
Pretty funny how Yonivore never decided to drag himself back into the mess he made in this thread.
I'm shocked. No really, I'm shocked.
No guys, really the agenda doesn't lie with the multibillion dollar mulitnationals trying to protect their industry. It lies with the grad students who are getting rich off working on climate studies while working on a MS or PhD. Follow the money!
Now this I can agree with. The money is going into convincing people that AGW is rampant.
Pretty funny how known of you climategate twits felt the need to post about the Heartland ins utes files this week. Par for the course.
Pretty funny how Yonivore never decided to drag himself back into the mess he made in this thread.
I'm shocked. No really, I'm shocked.
You mean fakegate?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/1...land-do ent/
Way to cite something that cites the Koch Foundation and the Heartland Ins ute. Good thing that its actually in the link otherwise you probably would lie about what the sources actually were.
I'm sure the media will be all over this "smoking gun".
The money trail is completely legit, dumbass. Own up to the bull you spew and dont run from it, darrin.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...m_business_pop
That you lie as a matter of course or that the sources cited were from the oil lobby?I'm sure the media will be all over this "smoking gun".
The little 'he said, she said' drama that you shill does not interest me. If their is an objective source then thats great but you did not link one.
The money trail is completely legit, dumbass. Own up to the bull you spew and dont run from it, darrin.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...m_business_pop
75 pages and it reads just like a religious debate. Pretty much what I said 60 odd pages ago. People that don't understand science pretending that they do, and people thinking that only one side has any money to make from it.
Money to be made on both sides. Hansen is rich. Yet one side is funded way more than the other. Let me know the next time jesus has peer review backing him up, though.
I am willing to bet that the demographics of those that deny climate change also go to a protestant church every Sunday. The combination of the religious right and oligarchs made into the GOP is one of the worst things to happen to this country.
Heartland Ins ute Threatens To Sue Anyone Who Comments On Leaked Do ents
"Bloggers around the world have been commenting on recently leaked Heartland Ins ute do ents that reveal their internal strategies to discredit climate science. These posters are now under threat of legal action. According to the Heartland Ins ute 'the individuals who have commented so far on these do ents did not wait for Heartland to confirm or deny the authenticity of the do ents. We believe their actions cons ute civil and possibly criminal offenses for which we plan to pursue charges and collect payment for damages'"
LOL...
According to Heartland, one do ent is a complete fake, and others are altered.
Where is the PDF...
I will assume the actions happens as heartland say they did. I hope the people responsible go to jail. Iden y theft is a crime.
Where is the MSM on this Heartland scandal?
Why would the media want to show that the funding going to the HLI paints a clear picture of an agenda? They're too busy taking scientists out of context. Pretty much like you.
Oh Manny, don't you get it?
The liberal media has been slapped hard with fake do ents in the past. Remember Rathergate?
http://scitation.aip.org/getpdf/serv...al&bypassSSO=1
Climate scientists not cowed by relentless climate change deniers
Receiving an email with a statement like “You should resign, and if you don’t, I’ll work to see that you are fired” or “I know where your kids go to school” would be unsettling enough. But they “pale compared to what other climate scientists are getting,” says Raymond Orbach, director of the Energy Ins ute at the University of Texas at Austin, at whom the first threat above was aimed.
Now climate scientists—in atmospheric physics and chemistry, geophysics, meteorology, hydrology, and oceanography, among other disciplines— have begun to fight back. “I think the community is finding a voice,” says Ben Santer of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, whose work has largely focused on identifying the human influence on global climate, and who once answered a late-night knock to find a dead rat on his doorstep.
Interesting. If real, the shoe is of the other foot as the skeptics of AGW warming have already been fired in many places. Now they know what it's like.
Ridiculous. Never thought becoming a scientist meant this kind of .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions