Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Scalia Rewrites History, Claims 5-4 Bush v. Gore Decision ‘Wasn’t Even Close’


    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...nt-even-close/

    Repug SCOTUS appointees, extreme, biased activists everyone of them, will America for decades.

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,842
    hindsight is 20/200

  3. #3
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    Nevermind, I read the damn link.

  4. #4
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Ginobili didn't really foul Nowitzki at the end of that WCF Semifinal game, and the Spurs got screwed out of a three-peat.

    Al Franken didn't really win Minnesota, and that gave the Dems a majority in the Senate.

    Waahh.

    Shut the up, Boutons. It's over. I don't know what the Scalia was thinking, but it doesn't change anything.

  5. #5
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Bush v. Gore

    In a 7-2 opinion, the court ordered that a ballot recount then being conducted in certain counties in Florida was to be stopped due to lacking a consistent standard. The court further declared, in a 5-4 vote, that there was insufficient time to establish standards for a new recount that would meet Florida's deadline for certifying electors. The ruling in effect awarded Bush the presidency.
    The 7-2 vote stopped the uncons utional recount. The 5-4 vote stopped the nattering and saved everyone a whole lot of time and inconvenience of going through a recount that has, since, been proven would not change the outcome.

  6. #6
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    the entirely underlying context of the abomination Bush v Gore is that there's this thing called the Cons ution that contains a mechanism to decide too-close-to-call elections that has been invoked before, and also would have resulted in Bush winning anyway
    And, what is that mechanism?

    State's decide how they're going to choose the electors that participate in the presidential vote. The problem in Florida is their "mechanism" for deciding a close vote was a) not followed and b) usurped by the Florida Supreme Court decision the U. S. Supreme Court smacked down.

    Had the Supreme Court not stepped in, Florida would have been allowed to selectively and non-uniformly recount votes until they achieved the result they desired -- a Gore victory.

    7 of the Justices saw it that way. Only 5 (still a majority) believed it was a waste of time to let Florida come up with something better and more fair. And, in that 20/200 hindsight, they were right...because a fair recount would not have changed the outcome.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •