Reply With Quote
::crickets::
The Real Delegate Score: Mitt Romney 93, Ron Paul 82
Romney: 93
Paul: 82
Gingrich: 29
Santorum: 25
Unpledged: 14
http://www.dailypaul.com/214504/the-...ney-93-paul-82
UPDATE:
Possible Delegate Counts So Far
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content...rs-the-youtube
WATCH VIDEO:
UDATE 2:
Reality Check: The real Republican delegate numbers (VIDEO)
WATCH VIDEO:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content...rs-the-youtube
UPDATE 3:
Ron Paul on Delegate Math
"In fact, while I didn't win any state's straw polls, my team expects me to win a plurality of delegates in at least three states, as well as outright majorities in two more of the states that have already started their process."
http://blogs.ajc.com/jamie-dupree-wa...delegate-math/
Last edited by Galileo; 03-09-2012 at 10:04 PM.
::crickets::
Here is another estimate of delegates, this person estimates Paul has 143 delegates: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...-Counts-So-Far
B-) cool
a sunny forecast is quickly dispelled by the actual weather
So i suppose that every media outlet in the country is lying with their delegate counts as well as being a part of some nationwide conspiracy involving thousands of people directly reporting knowingly false information.
The post is bad he starts going state by state and then proceeds to to guess on each states assessment.
We really don't know the delegate count until they all actually place their vote. It's too soon.
Well seeing that the delegates are either winner take all or district based; its not all that hard to figure out. This is like hoping that the electors in the electoral college are going to go rogue. Its wishful thinking unfounded nonsense: something, WC, you should be more than familiar with. If you believe it enough maybe it will be true, huh?
Fuzzy, I don't recall the terminology, but some delegates are suppose to vote by the voters will. there are still many in most states that are uncommitted, and can vote differently than the elections show.
No wtf do you think caucuses are for? And the members of the electoral college can vote whatever they want as well. only problem is that in the entire history of presidential elections the number that have done it can be counted on a single hand.
In some states delegates are determined at the county level but the delegates are chosen from supporters of a particular candidate within that district or county. hoping that all those districts that voted for the Romney support network had people only masquerading as Romney supporters is stupid ass wishful thinking.
So the Des Moines Register when they have people at the caucuses was lying as was the New Hampshire press and then Arizona and Detroit Free Press. They are all in on it as are all of the various national media outlets ranging from the National Review to MSNBC. All the radio folks too?
All of the individual people reporting from the districts and newsrooms? None of them have come forward?
Better read this:
Wiki: Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012
Insiders from Paul's campaign have claimed securing most of the delegates who are under a "nonbinding" status.
There is no law prohibiting the delegates themselves from speaking. Quite the contrary as they are the GOP leaders of their area. You go ahead and believe the 'insiders' referenced on a wiki page that everyone else is lying.
Did I say I believe them? I think not. I said, that said he had more delatates, and provided a reference to why they could be right.
Why do you always twist what people say?
Are you really that twisted? maybe you just have serious bias and lack of comprehension.
You cited a wiki page and agreed with what they were saying. Now you are saying you do not believe them followed by "I said, that said he had more delatates" which is exactly what they would have you believe.
You suck at dissembling.
Look.
I did misstate in this last post. My point is that the Paul camp claims they have more delegates. I simply do not know if that is a factual assessment. The wiki page shows there is room for the Paul camp to be correct.
The wiki page says they indeed do claim that and nothing more. And for s sake I have some friends that changed the numbers on Teddy Roosevelt's wiki page saying that he killed 10s of thousands of lions, elephants etc on his hunting trips and they didn't catch it for years.
At the bottom of the page they have citations. If a comment on a current event like that is not cited you are a fool to just take it at face value. So anonymous 'insiders' from Paul's camp are right but every other outlet in the country is in om some hoax and you give the notion credence because you read it on a wiki page?
gmfb
So the state count so far, per NBC: Romney 3 wins (VA, VT, MA); Gingrich 1 (GA); and Santorum 1 (TN)
Reality Check: The real Republican delegate numbers (VIDEO)
WATCH VIDEO:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content...rs-the-youtube
B-) cool
Ron Paul on Delegate Math
"In fact, while I didn't win any state's straw polls, my team expects me to win a plurality of delegates in at least three states, as well as outright majorities in two more of the states that have already started their process."
http://blogs.ajc.com/jamie-dupree-wa...delegate-math/
So Paul's still going to lose the nomination.
Will Ron Paul Invite Mitt Romney To Be His Vice President?
"But why," you might ask, "would Ron Paul want Mitt Romney, a soon-to-be washed up politician, as his running mate?" Well, because Ron Paul, a fan of the wisdom of the founding fathers, might appreciate the pre-1804 thinking of having a man who is his biggest opponent as his vice president. The idea was encouraged in the U.S. Cons ution Article 1, section 2 before it was altered by the 12th Amendment. Jefferson, for example, was the vice president to Adams. Boy did those two not get along. They had some fundamental differences of opinion.
http://lewrockwell.com/stevo/stevo12.1.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
