Obama caught on tape admitting to election fraud in Maine.

[SA210]

All I see is an insult or two, and you ducking the direct question, again, although you did add the cliched "oh yeah, well prove a negative". It isn't my job to prove anything. You claimed it was the president, it is your burden of proof.
(this is a logical fallacy by the way, http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...-of-proof.html )

I will ask a third time.

Yes or no, can you provide some corroborating proof that the video in the OP actually *is* the current president?

You're not teaching anyone anything. You can get off of your high horse, because it's just foolish. The evidence is the tape, the audio recording. There is no more burden of proof, (wtf, am I going to be able to ask the man himself or what lol) other than the other videos which clearly shows what he is talking about. It's my belief that it's him (common sense btw), and it's your make belief that it isn't.

And my insults aren't necessarily insults just to be insults, they are fact. You act like morons, and blind ones. Everyone knows it's Obama on that tape. Now if he really doesn't reveal anything on the tape at all as you all seem to think, then why feel the need to say it isn't him in the tape? You see, I'm not trying to insult, that is plainly you just being an idiot.

Some of yall really need to open your minds and stop being so damn programmed to the mainstream crap that your brains are accustomed to. It's really naive and stupid to think conspiracy's or illegal elections and fraudulent government are things that happened only way before we were born.

Instead of you using cliche arguments and trying to feel taller..stop being such a sheep and do some research. Watch all the videos I posted, then after you have watched all the videos with an open mind in their entirety, then listen to Obamas audio, and you can clearly see what he is referring to. If you still come back acting a fool, then it just shows how you don;t care about facts, you just have blind love for party rather than truth, or mainstream thinking, (because that's easier). And of course this isn't in the media, how many other atrocities also are NOT in the media? That's weak. Obama is the darling of the media. He killed babies in Lybia, is a war criminal..no congressional consent to do so....Is the media reporting that? Is anyone going to jail for war crimes? Of course not. All of you think you have provided a good argument, but you haven't.

tbh..That's just re ed *Tim Duncan*

[RandomGuy]

You're not teaching anyone anything. You can get off of your high horse, because it's just foolish. The evidence is the tape, the audio recording. There is no more burden of proof, (wtf, am I going to be able to ask the man himself or what lol) other than the other videos which clearly shows what he is talking about. It's my belief that it's him (common sense btw), and it's your make belief that it isn't.

And my insults aren't necessarily insults just to be insults, they are fact. You act like morons, and blind ones. Everyone knows it's Obama on that tape. Now if he really doesn't reveal anything on the tape at all as you all seem to think, then why feel the need to say it isn't him in the tape? You see, I'm not trying to insult, that is plainly you just being an idiot.

Some of yall really need to open your minds and stop being so damn programmed to the mainstream crap that your brains are accustomed to. It's really naive and stupid to think conspiracy's or illegal elections and fraudulent government are things that happened only way before we were born.

Instead of you using cliche arguments and trying to feel taller..stop being such a sheep and do some research. Watch all the videos I posted, then after you have watched all the videos with an open mind in their entirety, then listen to Obamas audio, and you can clearly see what he is referring to. If you still come back acting a fool, then it just shows how you don;t care about facts, you just have blind love for party rather than truth, or mainstream thinking, (because that's easier). And of course this isn't in the media, how many other atrocities also are NOT in the media? That's weak. Obama is the darling of the media. He killed babies in Lybia, is a war criminal..no congressional consent to do so....Is the media reporting that? Is anyone going to jail for war crimes? Of course not. All of you think you have provided a good argument, but you haven't.

tbh..That's just re ed *Tim Duncan*

You have no proof then.

Audio in the OP is Obama-- rejected. Thread fail.

[SA210]

You have no proof then.

Audio in the OP is Obama-- rejected. Thread fail.

Thanks for giving up and having no argument.

[Blake]

You're not teaching anyone anything. You can get off of your high horse, because it's just foolish. The evidence is the tape, the audio recording. There is no more burden of proof, (wtf, am I going to be able to ask the man himself or what lol) other than the other videos which clearly shows what he is talking about. It's my belief that it's him (common sense btw), and it's your make belief that it isn't.

And my insults aren't necessarily insults just to be insults, they are fact. You act like morons, and blind ones. Everyone knows it's Obama on that tape. Now if he really doesn't reveal anything on the tape at all as you all seem to think, then why feel the need to say it isn't him in the tape? You see, I'm not trying to insult, that is plainly you just being an idiot.

Some of yall really need to open your minds and stop being so damn programmed to the mainstream crap that your brains are accustomed to. It's really naive and stupid to think conspiracy's or illegal elections and fraudulent government are things that happened only way before we were born.

Instead of you using cliche arguments and trying to feel taller..stop being such a sheep and do some research. Watch all the videos I posted, then after you have watched all the videos with an open mind in their entirety, then listen to Obamas audio, and you can clearly see what he is referring to. If you still come back acting a fool, then it just shows how you don;t care about facts, you just have blind love for party rather than truth, or mainstream thinking, (because that's easier). And of course this isn't in the media, how many other atrocities also are NOT in the media? That's weak. Obama is the darling of the media. He killed babies in Lybia, is a war criminal..no congressional consent to do so....Is the media reporting that? Is anyone going to jail for war crimes? Of course not. All of you think you have provided a good argument, but you haven't.

tbh..That's just re ed *Tim Duncan*

Rrrrrrrrrrrrofl

[RandomGuy]

Instead of you using cliche arguments

Description of Burden of Proof
Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form:


1. Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.
2. Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.

In many situations, one side has the burden of proof resting on it. This side is obligated to provide evidence for its position. The claim of the other side, the one that does not bear the burden of proof, is assumed to be true unless proven otherwise.

Side A = myself
Claim X = the audio in the OP is other than Obama ["bull has been called"]
Side B = SA210

Lack of evidence that the audio in the OP is someone other than Obama does not mean that the audio is Obamas.

1. Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.

1. [the audio in the OP is other than Obama] is presented by [myself] and the burden of proof actually rests on SA210 [to show that his claim it is Obama]

2. Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.

2. [SA210] claims that [the audio in the OP is other than Obama] is false because there is no proof for [the audio in the OP is other than Obama].

Can you prove it isn't him?

Cliched logical failure on the part of conspiracy theorist.

[RandomGuy]

Thanks for giving up and having no argument.

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which the unskilled suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average.

Kruger and Dunning proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:

1.tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
2.fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3.fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;

You have been pwned.

Sadly, you don't realize how badly you have been pwned.

[ChumpDumper]

lol belief

lol programmed

lol research

lol babies

lol cue ignore post

[clambake]

lol belief

lol programmed

lol research

lol babies

lol cue ignore post

[SA210]

You have been pwned.

Sadly, you don't realize how badly you have been pwned.

What's sad is that you don't understand that I know what you are TRYING to say and do, and that you actually think you pwned someone is hilarious. The pwning here really is on you, all you want to talk about is pretending to know about burden of proof arguments and trying to debate that instead of debating the videos I provided. Why are you so scared to actually watch all the videos I provided, with an open mind, then watch the Obama video with his voice and connect the dots? Why is it so hard for you to do that? Maybe because arguing burden of proof, tin foil hats, etc is easier for a simple mind like you? If you divert attention from what I have been actually saying, I guess it's easier to tell yourself you've pwned someone, when you've basically just pwned yourself.

Now, instead of trying to win a cookie or some internet points with those stupid cliched arguments that mean nothing other than trying to stroke your own ego, stop ignoring and avoiding what i said bout watching all the videos, and then the Obama one, and understanding what he's actually referring to. Watch with an open mind.

I also like how you avoided my statement about how yall deny that Obama reveals anything at all in the audio, but yet you want to make sure and say it's not him speaking in it though (when btw, it's clearly his voice) lol

Oh, and avoiding the fact that Obama is a baby murderer and did it without the consent of Congress. You can try to make yourself believe you owned someone on a tape of Obama admitting that Republicans stole an election in a state, but in no way can you say he isn't WORSE than the tape by bombing babies and being a war criminal.

Oh no, he can go to war illegally without consent of Congress and knowingly bomb babies..but nah, Obama couldn't possibly talk about Republicans stealing an election from Ron Paul to someone.

Killing babies and bombing Lybia without Congressional consent, YES.
Talking nonchalantly about voter fraud by Republicans... NO! He'd never do that! lol

Again, before you try to grow your ego more and regurgitate your nonsense by trying to give classes on other subjects, go watch all the videos first...with an open mind. Then after you do that, come back and tell me that you think baby killer wasn't referring to election fraud in any way shape or form.

pwned

[LnGrrrR]

No, I'm saying you're a moron for trying to deny that it is him, and you can't prove that it isn't.

So you can't prove it then.

[SA210]

So you can't prove it then.

It's his voice. Listen to it. Then watch all the other videos to understand it.

Next

[RandomGuy]

It's his voice. Listen to it. Then watch all the other videos to understand it.

Next

It isn't Obama. We have already logically rejected it. I am pretty sure it is you.

Can you prove it isn't you?

You make about as much sense as Darth Vader on a unicyle playing bagpipes.




I would say that *is* you, but I doubt you are that talented.

[LnGrrrR]

It's his voice. Listen to it. Then watch all the other videos to understand it.

Next

So you can't prove it then. Thanks.

[SA210]

It isn't Obama. We have already logically rejected it. I am pretty sure it is you.

Can you prove it isn't you?

You make about as much sense as Darth Vader on a unicyle playing bagpipes.




I would say that *is* you, but I doubt you are that talented.

Yup, you got pwned. You didn't watch the other videos. You ignored everything, literally everything. You lose lol

Thanks for supporting the killing of babies without Congressional support btw.

You've lost all credibility with me. You can't even argue what's being discussed, I get it.

Thanks for playing

[Blake]

SA210 ignoring many of them, pwning the rest of them

[RandomGuy]

Yup, you got pwned. You didn't watch the other videos. You ignored everything, literally everything. You lose lol

Thanks for supporting the killing of babies without Congressional support btw.

You've lost all credibility with me. You can't even argue what's being discussed, I get it.

Thanks for playing

Heh, you top off the illogical shifting of the burden of proof with a strawman, then thump your chest.

Cliche.

I don't care how credible I am to crazy people. The fact you don't find me credible gives me a warm fuzzy.

It was you talking in that first video. You can't prove it isn't.

[SA210]

Heh, you top off the illogical shifting of the burden of proof with a strawman, then thump your chest.

Cliche.

I don't care how credible I am to crazy people. The fact you don't find me credible gives me a warm fuzzy.

It was you talking in that first video. You can't prove it isn't.

lol Still ignoring watching all the videos.

[RandomGuy]

lol Still ignoring watching all the videos.

Can you prove the first video wasn't you?

If you made up the first one, how do I know you didn't make up the others?

Who are you shilling for?

[RandomGuy]

Who would have a motivation to make up lies about the President?

Gawd, I hopw the NWO isn't splitting into factions. , if *they* start backstabbing each other, aren't we all ed?

[RandomGuy]

Darth Vader on a unicycle, playing the Star Wars theme on the bagpipes.

It doesn't get any awesomer.

[SA210]

lol So you have no argument, and never did. Thanks.

[RandomGuy]

lol So you have no argument, and never did. Thanks.

My argument shredded your half-assed logical fallacies. You can say it didn't 99 times, and it won't be any more true the 99th time as it was the first time.

Meh. You bore me.

Unless you can play the bagpipes on a unicyle?

[SA210]

My argument shredded your half-assed logical fallacies. You can say it didn't 99 times, and it won't be any more true the 99th time as it was the first time.

Meh. You bore me.

Unless you can play the bagpipes on a unicyle?

Make it 100 times. You never had an argument, goodbye quitter. You've been pwned. lol

[Blake]

Make it 100 times. You never had an argument, goodbye quitter. You've been pwned. lol

I think you've clearly proven that Obama has been pwned

[MaNuMaNiAc]

I think you've clearly proven that Obama has been pwned

You're not actually falling for SA210's bull , are you Blake?