Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 66 of 66
  1. #51
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    Ok, Matt Barnes/Fish makes sense (although I'd argue Crawford is worth the 2M extra you are saving in this trade).

  2. #52
    Believe.
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    3,699
    Via Chris Haynes on Twitter: Yes, it's official Jamal Crawford has played his last game as a Portland Trail Blazer


    Blake benched on the 4th quarter despite a decent game against NOH tonight. I guess its a done deal?

  3. #53
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    Why would POR give up Crawford for Blake? Makes no sense....He has an extra guaranteed year on his contract.

  4. #54
    Veteran namlook's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    2,369
    This is stupid for the Lakers. Odom is by far a better player than Beasley.
    Lakers may have moved Odom at the right time. Odom was better last year but he is an emotional train wreck now and has been absolute garbage this year. Advantage Beasley.

  5. #55
    Believe.
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Post Count
    3,699
    Why would POR give up Crawford for Blake? Makes no sense....He has an extra guaranteed year on his contract.
    No idea. Just rumors I read from a couple of sites.

  6. #56

  7. #57

  8. #58
    All magic pass1st's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    8,437
    I saw that too, surprised the Wikimods didn't change it since it isn't official

  9. #59
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    I don't get POR's motivation unless they got picks for Jamal. If it's for Fisher/Barnes, they save about 1.5M I think, but they get useless players for their team. If it's for Blake, he sucks and has a longer contract (1 extra year at 4M).

  10. #60
    5-5 Deuce Bigalow's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    2,147
    I don't get POR's motivation unless they got picks for Jamal. If it's for Fisher/Barnes, they save about 1.5M I think, but they get useless players for their team. If it's for Blake, he sucks and has a longer contract (1 extra year at 4M).
    no not bARNES. dO not GIVE bARNES UP!

  11. #61
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,765
    u think Fish will poke another one of his kid's eyes out so he can get bought out?

  12. #62
    5-5 Deuce Bigalow's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    2,147
    u think Fish will poke another one of his kid's eyes out so he can get bought out?
    Why would you say that?

  13. #63
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,765
    Why would you say that?
    very real possibility, IMO.

  14. #64
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,765
    So you'll be happy? I thought you're the guy who doesn't put out to pasture the players who've delivered for you?

    Kobe sans Fish:

    0
    Fish sans Kobe: Western Conference Finals

    Kobe sans Fish: home by the 2nd round

  15. #65
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Fish sans Kobe: Western Conference Finals

    Kobe sans Fish: home by the 2nd round
    Fine. You take that one. I got:::

    Kobe: 5

    the tired old bag Duncan: 4

  16. #66
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,765
    Fine. You take that one. I got:::

    Kobe: 5

    the tired old bag Duncan: 4
    deal.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •