Reply With Quote
Only pussies & assholes do rankings.
Kobe is going to be the most overrated, like be put in the top ten list of all time overrated 20 years from now. Thanks to Asians, kobe Fanboys, I want to keep my job Analyst like Kamla etc etc...
Just My prediction. Prolly be in Top 5 all time greats...
Only pussies & assholes do rankings.
The Lakerfans don't think Kobe is overrated.
Kobe is a bball legend and he's got awesome talent.
He does everything.
Dude you will watch the playoff games then say if he's overrated or not.
You rank players through Championships, so you can't talk.
You kind of have your hand in the cookie jar now, Curly. You rank Kobe over Duncan by rings.
It's a numerical fact, not an opine.
Which is still a ranking
It's a fact.
So Horry 7 Kobe 5 is kosher?
Again, you're pretending to just be posting facts. When people bring up Kobe needing Shaq to win his first three rings, it's qualifying. But when you bring up Jordan needing Pippen or Duncan not repeating, you're "just stating facts."
5-4 is a fact. It's not an opinion. Just like 4-3 Duncan was a fact. Not an opnion.
6-5 Jordan is a fact. He needed Pippen to get it there, but, it's there.
You still use that fact to rank Kobe over Duncan. Everybody here already knows how many rings Kobe and Duncan have, so you aren't repeating their ring count just to inform posters. You're trying to brag, because you think one of your favorite players having more rings than another player makes them better in some way (i.e., you're ranking players off their ring counts).
You qualified and you know it. You cited Pippen numerous times when talking about Jordan's success. You are no better than the people who cited Shaq when talking about Kobe's rings.6-5 Jordan is a fact. He needed Pippen to get it there, but, it's there.
according to Giuseppe's brilliant logic
Horry > Jordan
5-4 does that at default.
I just cited Pippen. 6-5 Jordan at default is a fact.
Never said such.
Then do not complain when people cite Shaq or Gasol when talking about Kobe's success, because it's the exact same thing.
So is Jordan better than Kobe?
Is horry better than Jordan?
Answer the questions
Nonsense. It's like you telling me now to let Stephen Jackson slide because Kobe quit and killed coaches. I look at it different. I suffered Kobe raping, quitting and killing coaches, took the shotgun blasts in the belly and never asked for paddy water, secure in the belief that "Neal" would come along and free me. That Stephen Jackson would come along and free me. That Barry would climb into the Paker bed and free me.
Uh, uh. I suffered the slings and arrows. And now I'm turning in the corner, and comin' out left hand gripped upon my freedom, right hand upon my Microsoft Mouse.
Yes.
No.
That response has nothin to do with what I posted.
Fact: You complain when people cite Shaq and Gasol.
Fact: You cited Pippen.
If you want to follow your own rules, don't cite Pippen anymore. If you do cite Pippen, then don't cry when people cite Gasol and Shaq.
You're not listening.
i.e., I don't defend my fandom.
Others defend theirs. Just because I don't defend mine doesn't mean I won't take off after them for defending theirs.
Proclaiming to not defending your "fandom" when it isn't even relevant to the discussion.
First of all, you defend your fandom every single time you post Kobe and Duncan's ring counts, and you know it. Every time somebody insults your precious Lakers, you turn to rings to both defend your Laker fandom and to get a rise out of Spurs fans.
Second, if you call people citing Shaq and Gasol pussies and assholes for qualifying, it follows that you are a pussy and an asshole for citing Pippen, correct?
I never defend my fandom.
It's my religion.
See? Now if you want to defend yours. Defend it. But, if I catch you I'm gonna crawl up and play dead in your .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
