An apology probably wouldn't make him any less of a got, but I'd accept it if he did.
Nobody gives a if you're being sarcastic. When you piss on people because of where they live, they tend to hold it against you.
I told you in the other thread... you should really apologize. Or don't people from California apologize?
An apology probably wouldn't make him any less of a got, but I'd accept it if he did.
Whatever. At least I had the courage to stand up for my convictions. I couldn't care less if a bunch of you dopes had your Texas pride and sensibilities offended. Your latest polls show Romney barely edging Santorum, so I don't think I'm too far off.
Call me what you want. It just reflects on your intelligence, not mine.
another hard core message board tough guy.![]()
That's what I thought. People from Cali don't apologize. It's not about your message, it's about you being bigoted about people because of where they live. It's about your hypocrisy.
Your comments are appreciated... you very much.
Pissing on people for where they live? Wrong. Pissing on people for their sexual preference? Totally acceptable.
Got it. Thanks for educmacating me.![]()
I'll apologize for what I wrote when people here say "No, see, my phobic jokes weren't because I'm from Texas, where it's more acceptable, it's because I'm a ing sop ric moron."
When I start getting those replies, I'll apologize.
Show me where I ever did that? I made a point of saying I don't care what RJ's sexual preference was. So, yeah, you're the bigot. Try and defend it any way you want to, but you ARE the thing you complain about. You just think your brand of bigotry is superior to the other people's. Listen to your tone... you actually believe you're superior because of being from Cali. Like people who believe they're superior because of their skin. Or their sexual orientation. Or anything else.
So we have to tell you what you want to hear first before you apologize?
lol...you should get off here and get back to that 14 incher.
your apology. You're trying to defend being a bigot, and you can't. Now you just sound like a child.
I know, right..
Roy is such a soft ass
so gay people have bigger s than straight people? What an odd insult. That's a whole combination of fears you should probably talk to a therapist about.![]()
First a thread bashing posters' gay jokes, now a thread calling out posters negativity.
Have you ever made quality thread about the actual spurs game or team?
I see you, GSH. GSH has been riding roy pretty hard lately. If roy weren't so used to taking hard throbbing shlong in the ass he'd probably notice.
Didn't say anything about gay, straight people or s tbh. Said you should get back to your 14 incher. Could be 14 inches of anything. From what little I have learned about you I'm assuming you have no real preference.
Tony wasn't limping when he walked off the court. Gave up one of the league's best back up point guards to draft Leonard. The club's penchant for trying to hang with 12 or 13 on the roster instead of one or two more may bite us in the butt. Let us hope not.
Did you just insult both of us in one post?
I'm done with Roy. He's shown what he really is. If you're from LA, you don't insult gays - just hicks, re s, and stinking Jews. 'Cuz they're all, like, prejudiced and stuff.
BTW - LA's city council is in the process of saying " the First Amendment". It's getting way to Orwellian for me. http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/...in-talk-radio/
Hey I'm from Cali... lol
I find these kinds of threads to be pretty annoying too. Not because of the use of language but because of the effort you put in to be an irritant.
I have total respect for you, Angelbelow. All people from California aren't like that, obviously. (My wife grew up in Woodland Hills.) I don't know if I'm the one you're talking to, but if so, sorry.
I was never a big fan of the gay comments about RJ, and I made that clear. Has nothing to do with basketball. But I'm also not a fan of other kinds of bigots. I wasn't trying to irritate him, I was trying to rub his nose in it.
Oh God the trade Tony threads have started ._.
Everyone's coming all over from all sides. Hey, it goes both ways. Don't get butt hurt when you open your mouth. Everybody should love everybody.
You wouldn't want to be a Derek Fisher.
All good GSH, my first comment was in response to anyone who generalized, which you did not.
I also had to brush up on his previous thread because I was missing the inside jokes/jabs that were directed at him
My 2nd comment was directed at Roy. Whether he was being sarcastic or not, its annoying (and sadly predictable) that someone starts a thread like this in response to a player injury.
I don't like to start a bunch of new threads, so I'll give this thread more respect than it deserves and throw it in here. It's actually sort of on the topic of the OP, sarcastic or not.
It sounded like Tony just had some tightness in his calf, and Pop isn't taking any chances. He's doing everything possible in this short season to make sure everyone is healthy for the playoffs.
And I had been thinking before the game, when they were talking about Rubio being out for the season - "You know, Pop is just about 2 or 3 injuries away from being recognized around the league as a genius." Not on our team, but on a few teams like OKC, Chicago, and Miami. There are so many season-ending injuries around the league, and it could really determine a lot of the outcomes in the postseason. I'm not wishing injuries on anybody. But if any of those teams are unlucky in these last few weeks, and the Spurs do wind up 100% healthy for the playoffs, you're going to hear and read a lot of commentaries about how Pop saw it coming and did the smart thing from the beginning of the season.
All this talk about needing another big or more specifically a 4 is valid and all, but I was beginning to fear for our PG/play making position. When TJ decided to call it quits, I felt like our need for another PG was equally important to our search for front court depth. I should be more concerned about Parker's injury but recent weeks have been a wonderful time for us Spurs fans.
First, trading RJ for Stephen Jackson means that in addition to the obvious benefits, (addition by subtraction, nostalgia of having Jack back, the reputation that he brings etc), we get a player who has above average play making. 2nd, the signing of Patty Mills is necessary and has the potential to be a nice pay out. 3rd, if we can secure a guy like Boris Diaw, then we further improve the passing ability of our team. Compare that to just a few weeks ago when TJ and Manu were injured and our only reliable play maker with Parker with a dash of Duncan and a sprinkle of Splitter.
Hopefully I'm not getting ahead of myself about Diaw though, sucks to be Golden State and Hickson right now (who was actually with the Warrior team when Portland claimed him lol.)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)