Reply With Quote
You lied six times now.
Want to make it seven?
You forgot the wife beater ref.
tee, hee.
You lied six times now.
Want to make it seven?
You forgot the wife beater ref again, tights.
Eight?
I'm glad your so obbsesed with yourself cully because obviously nobody else cares about you.
Though:::
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
will give ya pause.
Ok you typed up numbers, congrats.
You're the one the who has a bee in the bonnet over it.
I have a problem with people seriously doing it, that's not you.
Ask ownership that same question. Would you rather have four banner or five? You know the correct answer.
I think the ring comparison is towards the superstar players and that's the way it should be. There's plenty of old Celtic dudes with 10,9 and 8 rings. Horry with seven but wouldn't be considered a HOF player or superstar at any level. Great role player. Same with Kerr and alike.
The one problem I will have with the ring comparison with Laker fans is how it's used when Kobe and LeBron is compared but often shunned when Kobe and Jordan are compared.
And Bryant 5. Turd Bag Tim 4 never gets old. If either one of them rings this year, this room will be crazy as .
Last edited by Ashy Larry; 03-27-2012 at 11:12 AM.
I don't think anybody seriously believes that 4-0 is better than 5-2.
I dont get how anyone can argue Kobe over Mj. Look I enjoy Kobe. But he has his faults ... so did MJ. MJ's faults are less glaring than Kobe's so imho, MJ>Kobe.
1. 6>5
2. 6 for6 > 5-2
But it's closer than most admit. Not as close as Kobe fanbois make it out to be. But it's a conversation ... even if it's a short one.
Last edited by Killakobe81; 03-27-2012 at 12:00 PM.
get a women u sucker
trust me. there are some spurs fans that do ......
You can trust Ashy, Red.
It's okay.
definitely agree. More rings and practically destroys Bryant in every statistical category.
and 6-0 > 5-2.
Nothing wrong with being the 2nd greatest 2 guard to ever play the game.
"I love Naruto."
- Lakaluva
"4-0 is better than 5-2"
LMAO probably one of the dumbest things I've heard
No it's not. If you calculate winning percentages, 4-0 is 1.000 and 5-2 is 0.714. You might say 7 appearances are better than 4, but from the other team's perspective, those are 3 potential future wins.
5 championships, 7 Finals vs. 4 championships, 4 Finals? hmmm....
That makes no sense. If you could go back and redraft, 10/10 coaches would take Jordan over Hakeem. He's the best player of all time (arguably), and no one would ever not take Jordan first if they could get him as a rook.
Duncan in a draft of course would get chosen over a HS kid, even one as good as Kobe. Duncan went to four years of college and was ready to be a star immediately.What? You're saying if you knew Kobe's career path would be what it is, that it would LESSEN his value because you get 3-4 more years of him playing before he turns 30? What kind of logic is that?
I completely disagree with you, but feel free to think what you want. Neither of us are objective in this situation, but Tim Duncan has never, ever had chemistry issues with this team, and IMO that counts for a lot in the long run.And But Kobe is the better player with the greater career.
And yet, given the fact that if both players were rookies, I'm betting almost every NBA coach would take Duncan and not look back.But the last 5 seasons Kobe has been better and increasingly so. Either way it's still close. but Kobe is better.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
