Truly doubt that will happen. He's already been tried and convicted in the media and interwebs.
No matter which way this goes it isn't going to end well. I just hope in the end people will act civil and not cause havoc.
Truly doubt that will happen. He's already been tried and convicted in the media and interwebs.
Again, if he got back into his truck then yes. Remember, an earlier account had him getting out of his truck to verify his location. That would imply that he re-entered it to continue looking for Martin after he lost him (and his call with dispatch ended). I stated earlier that I don't believe Z got out of his truck the second time to verify his location. He got out because he found Martin again......he got out to confront him. At that point Z is most likely physically close to Martin; close enough to cause Martin to panic, or at least judge that he can deal with what he perceives as a threat. So instead of attempting to run from this guy who has a truck Martin judges that he could probably deal with this guy, now that he has a better look at him.
Dunno after all, just my two cents. Z new account states that Martin punched him in the nose first, as opposed to the prior account which had Martin attacking him from behind.
I'm not sure how two stories that are so different could be circulated without anyone stepping up sooner to refute one of the accounts.
Damn, at this rate this thread is gonna beat that "free razor" thread in the club a few years ago.
I can't speak to e Lee's motives any more than Darrin.....or you for that matter. I will say with a high degree of confidence, that the likelihood of him advocating violence against Z or any of his family members is fairly remote.
How about you? Do you believe Lee has incentive to take a risk of that nature?
..
it turns out the police and the DA don't exactly back you up like you said upstream. reconsider?
Could be any reason. I don't remember his having a history of advocating violence like that, so I don't know why he would start now.
thanks for the laugh
Was it put on twitter for the world to see so they could mail their grievances to him? Wtf-ever.
As I just stated, I have no specific thought on the matter other than a disinclination to believe that Lees intent was to incite violence.
How about you? What do you believe Lees tweet was intended for?
Hmmm. Lets see
Nah, really don't have any other idea why he put his home address on Twitter.
How clueless you are about that is pretty obvious.
Honestly, I wouldn't be at all surprised. At the very least, he wanted to make a man, most likely already fearing for his life, that much more uneasy.
At best, e Lee was simply being extremely foolish. At worst, e had a very real agenda.
discounting that as a possibility.
You'd need to contact Lee to verify that though.
So inciting violence is the only possible motive for the message then?
So you guys don't know either.
Nice.
probably just so everyone could get a grasp of what the crime scene looked like /blue font
Man, black people really scare you guys less.
I'll agree it was a dumb thing to do. You all proved that.
All over the interwebs and news outlets, frustrated blacks are damn-near bloodthirsty.
But, yeah, sending out his addy over twitter was simply to allow those same people an outlet to send their "strongly-worded grievances."
lol. That summarizes nearly 40 pages of this thread.
U scared.
lol bloodthirsty blacks
I'm not scared. I didn't kill anyone.
lol reaching
Did he do it to incite violence? No.
Did he do it to incite harrasment? Yes.
JMHO...
Regardless of his intent, it's the wrong address and for that owes the homeowners an apology.
Or course I know its in response to the shooting.
You haven't killed anyone yet, but calling blacks bloodthirsty pretty much says it all.
I'll buy that for a dollar......So there is another possibility besides wanting to incite violence. Thanks for confirming.
What agenda would that be? Be specific.
And how narrow minded you are is painfully obvious.
Do you honestly believe that violence was his ONLY motive here? Really?
No possibility that he wants people to gather for a demonstration at the residence?
I don't deny that it's a ty thing to do, but to imply that e Lees intent was criminal in nature is a leap off the GW bridge IMO.
it's ok to try e Lee in the press, and for posters to jump to conclusions based on limited information about him. Indeed failing to jump to conclusions has just been denounced as naivete or worse.
However, giving George Zimmerman the same treatment would be biased and a sign of intellectual dishonesty.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
