Please see the previous corrections and admissions.
accepted.
I guess that would apply to knuckles as well?
Can we agree that Anderson Cooper is full of ?...![]()
Please see the previous corrections and admissions.
CC, I gotta say, you're being a complete . On one hand you're claiming that people somehow shouldn't rush to judgement and then you're saying like thanks for playing as if you somehow proved something. Thats ing re ed.
And the next person that says "innocent till proven guilty" needs to be punched in the damn face. That applies to a damn trial, not believing someone is guilty. If we weren't allowed to believe someone was guilty not a single person would be prosecuted.
The guy had a ing stupid history and should not have been carrying. He started the ing altercation and that directly led to the kid getting killed. He's guilty of something and if he's not guilty of anything in Florida law then Florida law is ing re ed.
Uh. Pretty sure no one's argued otherwise.
I said on like page two before all the evidence came out that I suspected it was a horrible misunderstanding from both of them.
Zimmerman for profiling Martin and Following him.
Martin for responding pre-emptiveley with violence.
Two idiots met at the wrong time in the wrong place.
"Florida law is ing re ed."
was proven when FL elected criminal fraudster Rick Scott governor.
That witness blew that "Martin jumped at me on my way to the car" bull out of the water. Witness didn't indicate any slamming heads on the concrete either.
Sheep are hilarious...
How did that Straus-Kahn thing work out for you when you sided with police?
How did the Duke Lacrosse thing work out?
Lets just all blindly rage against "the man" committing crimes against minorities when the opportunity arises regardless of who is actually in the wrong.
![]()
It worked out exactly the way they intended. Persecute and defame, and when the party is over, move on to someone else.
You're still living under the delusion that things like "facts" and "right and wrong" have any meaning. Boutons himself said the other day that it doens't matter if something is true, as long as it serves the desired purpose.
The guy was just arrested for resisting arrest and battery on a police officer. You want to tell me why he should have been allowed a concealed weapon?
@ you standing up for Straus-Kahn. No doubt in my mind he was guilty.
Duke Lacross? Really? What was my viewpoint on that? Who's the sheep here?
Now do me a favor. Read my posts in this thread. There are only a few of them, so it shouldn't be very hard for you. Tell me how many times I've even mentioned race. I'll await your response unless you decide to simply be a and not respond.
You sure about that?
You know, Manny, I really don't know what you have specifically said on the subject. I guess I can't retract, but I apologize.
His having a CCP, with those charges, worries me too. I don't know the specifics, and charges aren't the same thing as "guilty". But I really don't like the looks of that part.
I'm a huge proponent of CHL laws but this is the exact kind of that will become the poster child against them. When I argue for them, I point out to people how those who receive CHLs are much less likely to commit a crime. George Zimmerman does not fit that profile. He actively sought out situations where he could act as Steven Segal and that is exactly the kind of person you do NOT want to be walking around packing.
Oh, . And then I read that comment. Punched in the face? You wingnuts are a violent bunch, aren't you?
People are en led to think whatever they want. They aren't en led to put out calls for bringing the man in "dead or alive". They aren't en led to defame people. They aren't en led to put up posters offering a reward for his kidnapping. They aren't en led to tweet the address of innocent people, and suggest that people "pay them a visit". They aren't en led to loot stores "in protest".
You're too smart to not note the difference.
Last edited by GSH; 03-29-2012 at 09:46 PM.
By no means do I assume Z is innocent. If he wasn't some hyper vigilant, paranoid doofus, that kid would still be alive. I just take issue with how the media and professional race-baiters (Sharpton is both) handled this. Hopefully, Z stands trial.
yes he should stand trial. I want to believe that they would have gotten there, and I shudder to think that they might not have.
But this other stuff going on? That's just as big of a problem as the original incident.
Because he wasn't convicted?
Thats why I didn't mention YOU in that line idiot... I looked to see if I could find your opinion... but luckily... for you... I couldn't... so I didn't.
This justice colored by race mentality is a huge problem in this country...
Don't tell me race has nothing to do with your opinion. I can jump to any conclusion I want regardless of evidence to the contrary... didn't you just make that argument a couple of posts ago about the guilt of a shooter? Deciding someone I have actually talked to is a reverse racist seems like a of a lot less of a stretch.
Oh, and one more thing, Manny. Obama should have absolutely said, "I really can't comment on an ongoing investigation, without having the facts." What he did was beyond inappropriate. He's supposed to be President. What he did was irresponsible, just like his comment about the Boston police, back when.
That's basically what Obama said moron.
I can't comment on an on-going investigation? That's what Obama was supposed to say, lolz? ...And what exactly did he say that was wrong/inappropriate?
No he didn't.
I can only imagine the reaction if Bush had said that.
This is total BS. He was very Presidential and to say his statement was hateful is ridiculous. Zimmerman's father's comments were irresponsible.
The reaction he got, from both sides, proves that. And they know that. It's the wingnut creed that the ends justify the means. And in their world, race-baiting is necessary.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)