So everyone basically feels the same on this issue. It was only an excuse for CC to flaunt his bigotry.
![]()
So everyone basically feels the same on this issue. It was only an excuse for CC to flaunt his bigotry.
![]()
So how does blue team feel about hate crimes being treated differently than "regular" crimes?
Team Spurminator has never liked hate crime legislation. Crime is crime. If "hate" was a motivation, then let that apply in sentencing as well.
Purple team thinks a crime is a crime is a crime
Agreed. Aggravating cir stances already have a way to be taken into consideration.
Splendid analysis.![]()
Charge her with assault. Case closed.
agree strongly. criminalizing intentions/beliefs when the underlying actions are already punishable under law, is overkill. speech, even vile speech, should be protected.
It's bull thought crime.
Not the battle CC thought it was going to be.
Oh well, he got to spew some hate anyway.
So you agree that "hate crime" should be off the table for George Zimmerman, too. Since it's unnecessary to begin with?
You can read, can't you?
@ Chumps obsession with me...
got
![]()
That's two things you've gotten right in one day. A new record.![]()
@ CC's phobia
bigot
So have you figured out the answer to your question yet?
she should be given an award tbh leave the old woman alone
there's the question of what to do when justice miscarries locally or victims are otherwise left without a remedy for obvious wrongs. that's pretty much why federal civil rights actions arise.
I don't have a problem with civil rights actions generally, but with hate crimes specifically, because what they criminalize is not actions but intent/speech.
Last edited by Winehole23; 03-30-2012 at 03:05 PM. Reason: "or" instead of "and"
I have to agree with you, Winehole (even though you usually have a way of turning it around when I do). When victims are left without a remedy for obvious wrongs. Like when the entire jury was white, and the defendant black. Something was needed to break the stranglehold of small town justice.
The problem is, when you leave anything in the hands of politicians long enough, they will find new and creative ways to twist it, until it's completely perverted. The law of unintended consequences, and all that. But by the time it gets to that point, it's usually near impossilbe to get rid of.
This case didn't have any business being classified a hate crime. And yet, at this point in history, it was automatic. And the guy who got hit with a cane believed he was en led to it.
THAT was the point. Justice really is blind.
Well it seems the attack wouldn't have happened had the victim not been gay. I'm not saying the law is a great one or should even exist, but since it does exist I can't think why its application here could be dismissed out of hand.
Is it because it's an old lady?
call it "disturbing the peace" and call it a day. small fine and an 8-hr anger mgmt/sensitivy class. no way this should go forward as a felony
SMH. Usually expect better out of you, CG.
LOL actually being hit and hurt by the strike of a 71 year old
lol running and locking the door because Granny attacked you
lol not just disarming Granny on his first miss and then taking her meager physical abuse instead of calling the cops
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)