Reply With Quote
I was at a Rockets game where Beno brought the Spurs back from a big defecit nearly by himself. Talent was never his problem.
Never thought I'd hear Beno described this way. From Zach Lowe of Sports Illustrated:
http://nba-point-forward.si.com/2012...in-the-nba-24/
"(Iman) Shumpert passes what I call the Beno Udrih test: If a non-NBA fan were to randomly tune in to the right five-minute segment of the right Knicks game, he or she might flip the channel believing Shumpert is the best player in the league. That’s how good the guy can look for short stretches of games in which his shot is falling."
I was at a Rockets game where Beno brought the Spurs back from a big defecit nearly by himself. Talent was never his problem.
His rookie season with the Spurs was pretty good, also played good for Sacramento. He just isn't a guy that wants to come of the bench.
Confidence, mental toughness are lacking at times for Beno. He seems content just being in the league.
Tbh, I thought the test would have something to do with handling fullcourt pressure.
I should clarify that I think it's actually a pretty accurate description, of both Iman and Beno. A humorous mental image, though.
You'll never forgive him for that 2005 campaign
Luke Ridnour and Lyndsey Hunter
Tpark quitting 2 games into the Sonics series comes to mind as well.
...and applying full court pressure. Pop struggled to get Beno to pressure the ball baseline to baseline. 40 defense equated to a 30 defense in Slovenian. Language barrier.
For me passing the Udrih test is a good player (or one regarded as such) leaving and the team not being negatively affected at all by it.
how about when tpark always choked against nash only for beno to come in save the day
It's just so perfect that he used Beno for that.
I think it was all about desire and preparation, he had almost none of the latter because of the former. People who think he couldn't dribble the ball against pressure simply decided they didn't like him and never watched him again.
I'd put Goran Dragic in that category as well, tbh.
Dragic is the same way, tbh.
Dragic is like 10X better than Beno. He's not just a 5 minute show, the kid can play, you just probably didn't see any of his games lately.
You mean the 3rd game when he had 18 points, 8 assists and 4 boards?
I like the Beno Udrih test and was actually thinking of Shumpert the same way. For a short time one could easily believe he was one of the top players in the league. Then there are the other 95% of the time!
Dragic passing the "Beno" test as it's defined in the OP and Dragic being 10X better than Beno overall are entirely mutually exclusive claims.
Read the definition of the "Beno" test and mull over it.
Actually the part about "the right five-minute segment of the right Knicks game" implies that the player is otherwise a scrub. Which Dragic isn't.
The Beno test is just meant to be a look at players who can seem like the best player in the league, that if you look at the right stretch, they can appear all world. When Beno is playing with confidence, When Shumpert is hitting jumpers, they can look that good.
Dragic reaches that level as well(See the Dragic decimation of us). He's not that good on a consistent basis, but that doesn't mean he's not a good player. Dragic is clearly a better player than Beno or Shump, but if you look at a short stretch, they can all look like elite players.
Nick Collison, a player who's consistently excellent doesn't fit this category. He's good, but his play never makes you go Holy , Nick Collison is awesome. Players who pass the Beno test do.
Dragič >> Udrih for whoever is following their careers closely.
One could argue: Udrih's talent > Dragič's Talent
But as Beno is a whiny, fat & lazy all the talent in the world can't make him a good player. He is a big big waste of talent in my eyes.
I was trying to think which Spurs players pass this test, other than the obvious Tim, Tony, and Manu.
As good as this Spurs team is, there aren't really a lot of candidates. I don't think Kawhi has hit that level quite yet, but he's getting closer. During their really active/hot streaks, Blair and Neal might come close (I can think of a few games where Blair made things look so easy; then again, not sure if people associate "best player in the league" with "skillful rebounds, layups, and tip-ins.")
Stephen Jackson vs. the Spurs earlier this year or Danny Green against the Cavaliers might be once-in-a-blue-moon candidates (though I honestly didn't get a chance to watch the Cavaliers game).
I don't read this test in the way you guys do. At all.
Tim, Tony, Manu shouldn't even be in this discussion. This test is for scrubs who, every once in a while, have flashes of brilliance so bright that you might think they are the best player in the world. That has nothing to do with legit stars who do that regularly. The "That’s how good the guy can look for short stretches of games in which his shot is falling." part actually validates that.
On the Spurs I'd say guys like Blair or Neal would pass the test (or in the case of Blair, could). Think Blair's 20-20 in the sop re game. Or Neal being on a streak.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
