Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Pelicans
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    15,822
    Why is Pop giving both guys equal minutes? I'm looking at all the stats and advanced metrics and Splitter is clearly the better player. In fact, whenever Splitter is on the floor, he's almost as productive as Duncan and Parker. Only Manu has been much better. Makes little sense. Blair's been solid, but could you imagine seeing Splitter/Duncan/Lenoard/Manu/Parker full time? What am I missing?

  2. #2
    Veteran Spur|n|Austin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    8,962

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    2,065
    ...So now fans of other teams are coming here to talk about this?

    Splitter is Duncan's back-up is what it's apparently coming down to.

  4. #4
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Pelicans
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    15,822
    ...So now fans of other teams are coming here to talk about this?

    Splitter is Duncan's back-up is what it's apparently coming down to.
    But they can get away with bringing Blair/Bonner/Diaw off the bench. Seriously, if they keep giving Blair more minutes than Splitter, that's gonna be their Achilles heel in the playoffs. Splitter and Duncan gives them an elite frontcourt.

  5. #5
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    Why is Pop giving both guys equal minutes? I'm looking at all the stats and advanced metrics and Splitter is clearly the better player. In fact, whenever Splitter is on the floor, he's almost as productive as Duncan and Parker. Only Manu has been much better. Makes little sense. Blair's been solid, but could you imagine seeing Splitter/Duncan/Lenoard/Manu/Parker full time? What am I missing?
    As my fellow spurs brethren have been saying "if it ain't broke don't fix it". This regular season championship will be even sweeter than last years.

  6. #6
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Pelicans
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    15,822
    As my fellow spurs brethren have been saying "if it ain't broke don't fix it". This regular season championship will be even sweeter than last years.
    I can see that, but I've seen teams make adjustments in the playoffs. They can get away with starting Blair against OKC, but against the Lakers, they need to have Splitter and Duncan on the floor against the Bynum and Gasol. I was upset at Monty last year when he didn't start Aaron Gray and Okafor together against the Lakers. He instead went with a smaller Landry and the Lakers killed the Hornets on the boards.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    2,065
    Both they can get away with bringing Blair/Bonner/Diaw off the bench. Seriously, if they keep giving Blair more minutes than Splitter, that's gonna be their Achilles heel in the playoffs. Splitter and Duncan gives them an elite frontcourt.
    Which is why it hurts so much!

    Quite a few people have suggested it's because Pop doesn't think they can guard power forwards between the two of them and that they'll get in each other's way on offense. I kind of agree that they're not perfect fits but I think with time they could figure it out.

    The hope is that eventually Blair will get benched in the playoffs and then it'll happen but by then it'll be too late for Splitter and Duncan to develop any meaningful chemistry...

    So yeah, it probably is going to be the Achilles heel

  8. #8
    The Basketball Guy EricD's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Post Count
    347
    It's a load of bull.. Blair needs to sit his dunce ass and Splitter needs to play 25 minutes a night at the very least. When is Pop's stubborn brain going to stop managing minutes like he's coaching for the CYO?

    Tbh (cue timvp,tbh), I wonder if Blair's parents being in charge of the Hi-C's and snacks after the game has something to do with his set playing time,tbh? Are do you think it's in Pop's CYO rule handbook that Blair has to play 20 minutes every game, tbh?

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    Both they can get away with bringing Blair/Bonner/Diaw off the bench. Seriously, if they keep giving Blair more minutes than Splitter, that's gonna be their Achilles heel in the playoffs. Splitter and Duncan gives them an elite frontcourt.
    Not enough shooting/defensive mobility for Pop's liking. Even though Blair can't shoot from mid range either and doesn't move his feet any better than Splitter does, but he more closely resembles a PF.

    I've said it many times before and I'll say it again: If at least one of the bigs can shoot from mid range, pass (particularly from the high post) and move their feet well enough to do a passable job defending PF's, then you can absolutely play two C's together.

    They may not be a perfect fit together, but neither are Bynum and Gasol. When Gasol is posting up, Bynum can't really space the floor (though he's improved his mid range shot). And Gasol, particularly as he ages, struggles to defend mobile PF's. But the positives far outweigh the negatives.

    As far as Gray and Okafor, neither of them can shoot a lick. The Hornets, who labored to score, needed some semblance of offense outside of Paul, on the floor. So that made sense.

  10. #10
    Done with the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18,479
    I can see that, but I've seen teams make adjustments in the playoffs. They can get away with starting Blair against OKC, but against the Lakers, they need to have Splitter and Duncan on the floor against the Bynum and Gasol. I was upset at Monty last year when he didn't start Aaron Gray and Okafor together against the Lakers. He instead went with a smaller Landry and the Lakers killed the Hornets on the boards.
    Landry was too talented in that series to not start him. He was holding his own. Gasol was playing like so the Hornets didn't need two beast to clog up the paint. They needed what Landry was doing. The reason Hornets lost was ty outside shooting.
    Last edited by Nathan89; 04-06-2012 at 06:06 PM.

  11. #11
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    breaking hopes and dreams since 08, get used to it....his still figuring out wtf smallball is after 4yrs of failure trying to implement that , those 4 seasons the teams that won championships all had big frontlines, yet this clown continue to go away from what got him 4 rings

  12. #12
    Veteran Spurs da champs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    3,160
    I don't know if it's ignorance or just pure stupidity but can yal'll please stop listing Duncan as a PF , he hasn't really been one since the 2nd championship, anyways he's too slow to guard these new PFs.

    But as for your question I'd love to see Timmy-5, Splitter-4, Jackson-3-Leonard-2-Parker-1 as the starting lineup but Pop has his head too far up his own ass to realize what a championship starting lineup & who to play & who not to play anymore.

  13. #13
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Splitter and Duncan gives them an elite frontcourt.
    WhOA down there Nelly!

    *stiff reins the wild philly*

  14. #14
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    I don't know if it's ignorance or just pure stupidity but can yal'll please stop listing Duncan as a PF , he hasn't really been one since the 2nd championship, anyways he's too slow to guard these new PFs.
    The Spurs have listed him as such before. And its a very blurred line for a number of players, there is no standard definition. There are PG and SG that are even blurred. Way back players were listed as C,F,F,G,G. The 5,4,3,2,1... the nomenclature and role/positions are different from team to team and change through the years.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •