One last chance at redemption for Cubby

[ginobili's bald spot]

My ass. I'm the first one who predicted the Spurs would be NBA Champs. That was two months ago. Sure, now everybody is following suit, but, I was the first.

I'm the first who rallied around Odom on humanitarian grounds. A half dozen guys came in here and cited me for it.

Sure, I've went beyond all reason on the Jackson/Diaw issue, but, I'm inherently right. And we all know it.

I was right about Howard & Paul. Only one to discourage their coming to the Lakers from the start. But, I was right in the end.

The Fortification

[Giuseppe]

with the exception of Jackson/Diaw, (and spamming the board with crap about Jackson and Diaw quitting which isn't a basketball opinion at all), everything you just listed was "months" ago

Odom ain't.

Howard & Paul issue has come home to roost in the last two weeks.

No, you're wrong. But, you'll never admit it. You're never wrong.

[JamStone]

I think we have to come to grips that there are more than just a handful of posters here that are just really made. Both sides. All sides. Everywhere.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Odom ain't.

Howard & Paul issue has come home to roost in the last two weeks.

No, you're wrong. But, you'll never admit it. You're never wrong.

it doesnt matter when Howard & Paul "came home to roost", it was an opinion you shared months ago. How relevant the opinion currently is doesn't matter. You haven't had a legitimate discussion about it in months.

if Odom's personal problems and being a pussy is the closest you've come to discussing basketball in months, thanks for proving my point

[ginobili's bald spot]

Mid the sycophant is getting picked apart here. Culburn adds nothing an you know it, you only want him here because ing with him is some sort of OCD compulsion of yours.

That's a good point. Without Culburn, kool and Lakaluva mid doesn't really have a purpose. His entire schtick is based on ing with them. Is that what this is about Mid? I really can't think of any other explanation.

[Woo Bum-kon]

No, you're wrong. But, you'll never admit it. You're never wrong.

Oh, the irony.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

That's a good point. Without Culburn, kool and Lakaluva mid doesn't really have a purpose. His entire schtick is based on ing with them. Is that what this is about Mid? I really can't think of any other explanation.

He better hope 21_blessings starts posting again if Kori starts restricting Cully

[Woo Bum-kon]

Looks like Stale Dale doesn't like it when people won't admit that they are wrong, even though he does the exact same thing.

Hypocrisy #547

[ginobili's bald spot]

I think we have to come to grips that there are more than just a handful of posters here that are just really made. Both sides. All sides. Everywhere.

True. Beginning the cleanup with the ones who post the most makes sense to me.

[ohmwrecker]

tbh Cully admits it when he's wrong sometimes.

[Woo Bum-kon]

tbh Cully admits it when he's wrong sometimes.

Exactly. Other times he spams over and over again.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

tbh Cully admits it when he's wrong sometimes.

Only time I've ever seen him admit when he's wrong is when Ghazi and I took him to the woodshed on The Prediction and he had no way of denying that he predicted the Suns would win the 2011 Western Confrence

[Stalin]

lol at the idea that luva's threads are being unfairly spammed with Naruto . This guy has been posting with the same wigger act as Kool for how long now? All of his posts are the same bull . The only reason Stale Dale doesn't like the Naruto insults is because those insults are true.

lol at the idea that Stale Dale would actually tell anybody why he welshed. He hasn't told anybody because he doesn't have a good reason. Anybody who is familiar with his posting style should know that he parrots when he doesn't have anything to say.

lol at the idea that Stale Dale takes losses like a man. Spamming is not taking losses like a man.

lol at Stale Dale telling people that they can dish it but can't take it. He's been telling people on here to their mothers for how long? He has no problem with getting personal, but he has a problem with others getting personal with him, which is why he disowns anybody who makes fun of him for being a wife-beater. By the way, he gets mad at the wife-beater jokes because he actually is a wife-beater.

Again, Stale Dale is the biggest hypocrite on this forum. His basketball takes are so ty that he is afraid to defend them. His spamming isn't cute or funny. He's a poster.

Co sign

[ohmwrecker]

Admitting you were wrong once (red ass withstanding) is one more than zero.

[Woo Bum-kon]

Admitting you were wrong once (red ass withstanding) is one more than zero.

Okay. What's your point?

[ginobili's bald spot]

ohmwrecker quit GNSF'ing up the thread.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Okay. What's your point?

Prolly like Mel in the sense that he doesn't have one

[Stalin]

mid grasping at straws trying to defend culburn's shtick, tbh

[ohmwrecker]

Okay. What's your point?

I just don't understand why anyone really gives a what anyone else on this board does. To this extent, anyway.

[midnightpulp]

Spurstalk's greatest asset is the mix of trolling and basketball talk. Cully hasn't legitimately talked about basketball in months.

But the freedom we have here lends itself to the great trolling and basketball talk the site has become known for. Your racist shtick offends practically the entire forum and many people would indeed accuse you of "bringing nothing to table," (of course I don't agree with that since you balance your trolling with solid sports discussion, but I could see how a person's perception of you would be skewed toward only seeing your negative qualities) but I wouldn't want to see you restrained in any way. Not only do I find the racist shtick funny, I think limiting posters we don't like or whose shtick we don't find funny sets a precedent that's against the spirit of the forum. If Creepn, Trill Clinton, Angeluv, and like minded people were on the EC, we'd be in the position Culburn is now. Yes, I find his shtick uncreative and repe ive, but I think he has the right to it, just like I would want the right to post offensive cartoons.

Mind you, I'm not taking any kind of moral high ground here. I'm not above pinking/emasculating posters, but I do it because I find it funny rather than do it out of any kind of idealism or "for the good of the forum."

You claimed his spamming was only counter trolling. Are you now admitting that it isn't?

Most his responses are usually to people insulting the Lakers. But I do agree he often spams indiscriminately.

So you admit they're unfunny and offer nothing?

Yes.

So there's a poster who you're admitting most of the NBA forum wants gone and also has a shtick you don't find funny at all. Again, why are you defending this guy? You're behavior doesn't line up with your words.

Not necessarily defending him, I'm defending his right to be a repe ive, uncreative dumbass.

[Woo Bum-kon]

I just don't understand why anyone really gives a what anyone else on this board does. To this extent, anyway.

When the spouse abuser criticizes people for doing exactly the same thing he does, you better believe that I will call him out on it.

[ohmwrecker]

When the spouse abuser criticizes people for doing exactly the same thing he does, you better believe that I will call him out on it.

So. Call him out. I don't see anyone stopping you.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

But the freedom we have here lends itself to the great trolling and basketball talk the site has become known for. Your racist shtick offends practically the entire forum and many people would indeed accuse you of "bringing nothing to table," (of course I don't agree with that since you balance your trolling with solid sports discussion, but I could see how a person's perception of you would be skewed toward only seeing your negative qualities) but I wouldn't want to see you restrained in any way. Not only do I find the racist shtick funny, I think limiting posters we don't like or whose shtick we don't find funny sets a precedent that's against the spirit of the forum. If Creepn, Trill Clinton, Angeluv, and like minded people were on the EC, we'd be in the position Culburn is now. Yes, I find his shtick uncreative and repe ive, but I think he has the right to it, just like I would want the right to post offensive cartoons.

There are tons of other posters who I find incredibly annoying, there's a reason I single out Cully. As you said, it's his frequency coupled with his annoyance. if Angel_luv had a 24 hour stretch where she spammed the NBA forum with 260 something posts about how Obama was the anti-Christ, I'd be campaigning to have her banned as well.

Mind you, I'm not taking any kind of moral high ground here. I'm not above pinking/emasculating posters

Most his responses are usually to people insulting the Lakers. But I do agree he often spams indiscriminately.

I rarely if ever insult the lakers/Kobe anymore, or talk about them for that matter, yet I can't count how many times I respond to someone talking about basketball with something about basketball and cully comes out of nowhere with a catch phrase. Tons of other posters would say the same thing.

Not necessarily defending him, I'm defending his right to be a repe ive, uncreative dumbass.

Kool and hemann had that same right, so quit pretending you give two s about some random poster's freedom of speech

[mavs>spurs]

Mind you, I'm not taking any kind of moral high ground here. I'm not above pinking/emasculating posters, but I do it because I find it funny rather than do it out of any kind of idealism or "for the good of the forum"

Right, your back and forth game with culburn is some sort of entertainment to you, but to the 99% of the forum it's obnoxious. We looked out for our own interests just like you are doing now, so stop crying.

[midnightpulp]

There are tons of other posters who I find incredibly annoying, there's a reason I single out Cully. As you said, it's his frequency coupled with his annoyance. if Angel_luv had a 24 hour stretch where she spammed the NBA forum with 260 something posts about how Obama was the anti-Christ, I'd be campaigning to have her banned as well.







I rarely if ever insult the lakers/Kobe anymore, or talk about them for that matter, yet I can't count how many times I respond to someone talking about basketball with something about basketball and cully comes out of nowhere with a catch phrase. Tons of other posters would say the same thing.





Kool and hemann had that same right, so quit pretending you give two s about some random poster's freedom of speech

Lol. Didn't I just clearly state I'm not taking any kind of "moral high ground" here and am not above pinking/limiting posters simply out of spite or because I find it funny?

Simply put, Culburn annoys you more than he does me, just like Kool annoys me more than he does you. But if your vote was against Kool's pinking, I wouldn't call you out for it.