http://www.time.com/time/specials/pa...107959,00.html
Ron Paul #12
Barack #21
"irrelevant candidate"
In the coming days, the media will be expecting me to also bow down to their new prince. Well, I want to give them a little surprise.
Instead of a defeated candidate bowing out of the race, as we saw yesterday, let's show them a surging candidate determined to ride on to Tampa!
5
In the coming days, the media will be expecting me to also bow down to their new prince. Well, I want to give them a little surprise.
Instead of a defeated candidate bowing out of the race, as we saw yesterday, let's show them a surging candidate determined to ride on to Tampa!
5
mainstream media always ignores RP!
it was a vote by TIME readers
It's fitting since most of Ron Paul's support and the actions of those supporters pretty much exist only in cyberspace.
This and the other Ron Paul threads are fine examples. Not too much different from truthers when you think about it.
lol surging
"only on cyberspace"
When voting happens in cyberspace, you will have a point.
If all the internets bluster from Paul supporters like you translated to more than 9-12% showings in most of the primaries, I would believe that."only on cyberspace"
[Cue conspiracies and cyberspace delegate counts.]
not about the votes. It's "influence" on the world
Arab Spring
Occupy
Barack Election
Wikileaks
none of these major world events happens without cyberspace.
it was a vote by TIME readers
When you lose that badly that consistently, it's best to look at it that way.
True. Benedict berbatch is going to have a monumental influence on world events this year. This poll proves it!
Jeremy Lin apparently has more influence than Paul
Wonderful list.
"you can influence people without getting elected to office"
if the influence doesn't result in like-minded legislators and legislation, the influence changes nothing, which is precisely the case with Randian Paul.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-12-2012 at 11:01 AM.
correct.
billions of chinese now will practice basketball. huge influence
And Benedict berbatch?
movie/tv stars do have huge influence. lots of ppl watch movies/tv.
Off topic, but is there any real reason not to be able to vote online?
Would you allow for the mere possibility that the poll results could be skewed by factors like multiple votes of fanatics and the participation of people who believe that internet polls are something a flailing candidate could hang his hat on in the face of single-digit results in actual primary elections?
take that up with TIME Magazine.
Don't shoot the messenger. But TIME's most influential list is a pretty respected establishment and worth noting.
"cyber massive voter fraud!"
No, I'm taking it up with you. This is a direct question to you.
Would you allow for the mere possibility that the poll results could be skewed by factors like multiple votes of fanatics and the participation of people who believe that internet polls are something a flailing candidate could hang his hat on in the face of single-digit results in actual primary elections?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
