Reply With Quote
Looked more to me that O Reilly took a massive dump on Paul.
I was starting to feel embarrassed for RP when he was stammering through that question about nukes in Iran.
Fox news
Looked more to me that O Reilly took a massive dump on Paul.
I was starting to feel embarrassed for RP when he was stammering through that question about nukes in Iran.
disagree. When you have to use the argument "we have no time for history" you are pretty much showing that you are not using logic at all.
Einstein: E = Mc^2
O'reilly: We have no time for math!
I think it pretty much meant they were just out of time.
disagree again. He has plenty of time to talk about his books, fan letters, etc. He has plenty of time to listen to Paul's full answer. A professional journalist would.
You obviously don't understand how commercial breaks and TV time schedules work.
No wonder you think Paul was pwning.
have to disagree once again. Bill Oreilly throwing a dozen questions in a 5 minute segment is fault of his own doing. Again, a professional would have time managed better and only resorted to a few important questions.
The barrage of questions and interruptions shows poor logic and understanding of world events, and it's actually symptomatic of the poor guy getting owned.
lol a dozen questions
Why are you lying?
had you payed attention you would have counted at least 12 interruptions/questions.
An interruption isn't a question, ftr.had you payed attention you would have counted at least 12 interruptions/questions.
Please list the 12 questions. Thanks.
it helps to read the full posts
lol Ron Paul shuts anyone up that he debates with. Nothing new.
Agreed. If you read your full post, you'll notice you say he asked a dozen questions.
Please list the 12, thanks.
Except he doesn't.
You riding paul's is nothing new.
and I said questions and interruptions in the subsequent sentence. I'm sorry you need to be spoonfed.
questions, interruptions all add up to the alloted time. Instead of interrupting the person, a professional would have given plenty of time to answer the questions.
Has that loser dropped out of the race yet?
No Romney is still in..
I'm talking about loser Ron Paul... being a Ron Paul thread and all
You clearly said a dozen questions in a separate paragraph that did not include the word 'interruptions'.
Your stupid back pedal aside, how many questions did OReilly ask and what were they?
Last edited by Blake; 04-13-2012 at 09:00 PM.
This will be one of the few times that the left-leaning posters on here side with Bill O'Reilly.
Paul will lose to Romney, idiot.
If you think O'Reilly "won" I guess he won at being the bigger and trying to talk over his opponent and cutting him off before he can have a fair chance to defend his position
Just curious, are all the Ron Paul supporters on board with his son? Because Rand Paul 2016 is gonna happen for sure.
on this board? , everyone i talk to on campus or on the streets is a ron paul supporter. funny however during the "elections" that never seems to be the case.
no i mean what is your opinion of his son? Because we all know Ron Paul is a pipe dream but ppl are thinking Rand Paul might be a viable candidate in 2016.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
