Reply With Quote
So stop comparing...seriously.
No. I rounded up for BOTH guys dumbass. Go ahead and check for yourself.I like how 5.5 = 6 for Kobe, but 4.5 = 4 for Jordan...
I gave his 3.5 apg a 4. go ahead check the numbers
So stop comparing...seriously.
I take that back, I was looking at 94-95No. I rounded up for BOTH guys dumbass. Go ahead and check for yourself.
I gave his 3.5 apg a 4. go ahead check the numbers
To the tune of "Frère Jacques"you got those mixed up a little, but what were Kobe's?
30-6-6
Jordan type #s tbh
Here comes stat
Here comes stat
There he is
There he is
Statting like a got
Like a ing got
Suck a
Suck a
Not to mention Kobe was 3 years younger... and yet still couldn't match Mike's PER then...
Also not to mention MJ played in an era where they didn't baby the guards. It used to be a big man's game, and hand checking/roughhousing was allowed by the guards. Now you can't even look at guards the wrong way and refs blow the whistle...especially Westbrook and Kobe.
Kobe had more mileage.
And PER is a formula made up by Hollinger
Sad Lakerfan has to compare 29 y/o Kobe to 32 y/o Jordan to make it respectable...
What's even worse is that those 3 Finals were Kobe's peak, while Jordan had his better years already behind him during the 2nd 3peat.
Kobe got more double and triple teams than Jordan. the '90s and '80s were mostly man to man, meaning one on one. Now the great defenses have great schemes designed to limit great scorers. The defenses are not better back then, nor are they better today.
Kobe had more mileage
More seasons and more minutes = more mileage
Understand now?
What does that has to do with anything? Those were absolute peaks for Kobe as the man. You take Jordan's peak and you're looking at:Kobe had more mileage
More seasons and more minutes = more mileage
Understand now?
31/6/8/53efg%
35/6/6/51efg%
35/7/6/50efg%
Which destroys Kobe's peak.
Jesus H. Christ. Call Ripley's, ASAP.
Actually their regular season + playoff minutes come to almost the same, Kobe had a couple hundred more. But that's nothing. So even though their ages were different, their mileage was the same.
And who cares anyways? Jordan's first 3peat is untouched by anybody. Combined with his 2nd 3peat, that is why he is the greatest.
Kobe coattailed Shaq for 6 years... while Jordan was ducking it out as the #1 guy... more mileague my ass...
'85-'86 (2nd year) he only played 16-17 games
Played 0 games in '93-'94
Played under 18 games in '94-'95
That is basically 3 seasons off
vs 6 years hiding behind Daddy...
Give me his numbers in the '01 & '02 Playoffs please
Inflated numbers when Daddy was getting all the attention. And still nowhere near as good as Mike's 1st 3peat.
Why was his numbers better when he was getting all the attention in '08-'10 then?
I'm a trend setter.
I set trends.
They're barely better, and he peaked then. It's logical a player improves over the years, and at 30 y/o is normally the time where you have a good mix of experience and athleticism.
Uh they're much better shooting wise.
eFG%
Playoffs
'01 - .485
'02 - .459
'08 - .514
'09 - .492
'10 - .506
They're marginally better.... .485 vs .492?
.514, .492, .506 is much better % than .485, .459
also:
'01 WCF: 33/7/7/51%
'10 WCF: 34/7/8/52%
?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions