The point.
happens.
No one in their right mind had Dallas as contenders last year going in. They were playing some bad basketball.
The point.
happens.
No one in their right mind had Dallas as contenders last year going in. They were playing some bad basketball.
The Lakers are better without Kobe.
And Miami is better without Bosh tbh.
LOL apart from the Heat and Celtics the east is full of scrubs. Of course you're gonna have a winning percentage when you play scrubs like Milwaukee, Atlanta, Toronto and the likes.
I'm not taking away their ability to win games without Rose either but comparing the two conference is laughable. The West has always been the tougher conference of the two.
Give the Spurs bench a chance to play Milwaukee and Toronto every night and I assure you they will have a winning record without Parker. Guarantee.
Oh, ha, ha, ha... why would I be mad at something that is so obvious. Are
you
in
denial
![]()
Thank you for stating the obvious.
He said better without their best #1 player.
Bynum or Gasol still playing
Bulls are just a better overall team than the Spurs. SA is a 2-man team with Parker & Manu and neither are superstars at this point of their careers.
Duncan is another Boozer at this point of his career
No one else on the Spurs roster is worth noting
I don't like the Spurs at all but I would like to![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
at this post. Totally ignorant, like your anti-American views.
![]()
Wow, how do you respond to that? Wow lol
The only thing I agree with NewcastleKEG on is his views of minorities, particularly those of the black persuasion.
![]()
Ok, what?
![]()
![]()
no one in the NBA takes that clown over Duncan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)