Reply With Quote
I also missed out on losing at least 2 bills on Memphis and the Lakers by that logic. The $25 was well worth making you look foolish and gutless though.
Wanna rehash those threads again? Just say the word.
When did I say it was a bad matchup? Bad matchup and stupid bets are not mutually exclusive. Taking a straight up bet (w/o the 6.5 points) when the odds are against you is very dumb. If you would've played it straight you still would've won fair and square, but you were too mentally weak to give up your advantage. It happens.
I also missed out on losing at least 2 bills on Memphis and the Lakers by that logic. The $25 was well worth making you look foolish and gutless though.
Wanna rehash those threads again? Just say the word.
Also, keep dodging the Lakers-Spurs playoff bet. It's really helping your case here.
nice memory. You punked out and looked gutless. You clearly said the original offer was terrible. I said you can have the opposite. Then you acted like Koolaidman trying to gain the upper hand by acting like 100 was baller and I refused to do business with a Kool clone.
The logic is . Are you dumb for turning down a free $25, yes or no? No long response, no back peddling, just answer that one question.
I'll brb with the post that shut your ass up the last 2 times we had this conversation
Strawman. Explained why. You still can't explain your cowardice and atrocious logic.
You: "that bet is bad business. I don't do that"
Me: "I'll reverse it then. You get what you are adamant is a no brainer good bet, $25..."
You: "That's it playa loll, make it worth big spenda's time and do a hundo"
Me: "no, do $25 and defend your logic. Back up what you say, if you believe it, it's a free $25..."
You: "nahhhhhh, ain't worth my time"
Me: "egggggzachlee"
The logic is . Are you dumb for turning down a free $25, yes or no? No long response, no back peddling, just answer that one question.
Holy what a crock of this entire post is. Nevermind that you offered the original Memphis bet (with you taking the Spurs) out of anger and failed reading comprehension--we'll just leave that point alone.
The very fact that you're insinuating you would've bet anything less than a Ben (if not more) on the original bet is completely asinine, and makes you look like a liar. , you just offered a $250 straight up bet right now for the Lakers game
I deny your baiting and call it a stupid bet (and a bad business decision). You countered with the most neutered, weakest bet to make it look like you had balls. Here's where it gets good and I exposed your ass:
I countered with $100 (me taking the Spurs)--the VERY same (AT LEAST) money bet you were trying to offer me before, but then cried b/c I didn't take it. What'd you do? Go on a pissypants routine with "Why not make it a million!"
Not only that, you're killing your OWN point. If $25 is the same as $100 (like you said) and you "have the balls," then why didn't you take it instead of pitching a fit?
Do you understand how stupid you looked there? You not only failed to bait me, you then backed out of the very same bet (money-wise) you originally offered me
Prove ANYTHING I just said is wrong. I dare you. I double-dare you, motha a.
DD, wrong about LA today
Wrong about SA v LA even w points.
DPG: Wanna bet on the Memphis game (no terms, but at least a Ben is what you had in mind).
Me: Not w/o the points.
DPG: OK, I have balls. I'll bet a whole $25 on them.
Me: Why not make it a $100 and just take the original bet you offered me?
DPG:why not make it a million!
I caught you with your pants down and now you're hiding behind Kool-isms to mask the fact that I called you on your bluff
You're welcome to dispute anything in Post 35 with anything but more bull and backpedaling.
Seriously, have at it.
I already explained why, that doesn't explain your cowardice and poor logic. Are you stupid for turning down $25 by trying to haggle for $100?
You look like the coward because I asked if you believe in what you spout by asking you to bet. You said its a bad bet (even though you say LA bullies SA) so I reverse it and give you the odds. You didn't do anything by upping it to $100. Nothing. All you did was try to look cool when $100 is nothing compared to $25. It was a neutered counter to act like you have balls and I refused because I already exposed your poor logic (if it's a good bet, it's a good bet regardless of amount and you passing up on $25 if it's truly a good bet makes you look silly)
Leaders show up after a loss and don't slink off into the corner like a little .
Youve clearly been afraid to bet me and you hiding behind a Koolaidman counter doesn't mean much when it was free $$$$ yet you found a way to back out.
Awnser this simple truth bomb:
If it was a no brainer bet, why would you not accept the $25 version when you saw me decline the $100? Let's hear the "because I won by reverse punking you with my bad logic"
Holy you're in damage-control mode now
Why would you not accept the $100 bet when that's AT LEAST what you would've originally proposed to me?
Don't try and weasel out of this question like all the others you have by saying "I wasn't going to bet $100," b/c everybody and their mother knows you'd be full of .
If you had any real balls you would've taken your original offer and not countered with peanuts.
Why did you not take the bet when I dropped it down to $50 for you?
Answer: b/c you knew I was right in not taking the original bet, and you didn't even feel comfortable throwing 50 on it.
Why did you not take the original bet or the bet when I flipped it?
I explained why I didn't accept, can you?
Post 35. Notice how he's ignoring it like the plague because he can't deny anything in it.
Scoreboard.
No, you didn't. Please, let's hear a good reason for this.
Memphis owned the Spurs in the RS last year.
Also, Ginobili.
LA ain't doin , sorry.
DD - Dodging Deep
Why did you not take the original bet or the bet when I flipped it?
I explained why I didn't accept, can you
That'll help your case and make you look un-neutered.
Who confronted whom about betting? DPG - so clearly not scared
Who dodged the initial bet? DD - didn't think it was a good bet so understandable. Can't determine his character based on that.
Who offered to reverse the bet in an effort to force the other to engage? DPG - getting more difficult to say this person was cowardly and scared.
Who turned down a 2nd bet when it's in favor of him based on his protest? DD - this one is difficult to defend even with a false bravado bet to seem like he is game knowing he was exposed.
Tell me any of that is untrue. Also please answer the question you have been dodging Neo. K, thx.
DD still trying to bait posters?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
