Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 103
  1. #76
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    1,044
    i'll say Gary Neal has very good Basketball IQ, he just short, not overly skilled, slow and unathletic, but he still know how to be useful and effective, and he gets the most out of his abilities in a honorable manner and anytime that happened it's testify for hige IQ.
    besides, playing in unnatural situation for him, having to play out of position, running the point and doing it relative well and successful is also an evidence for hige IQ.
    The only thing Neal sees on the basketball court is the rim and he plays accordingly. Saying he maximizes on that skill set doesnt really mean he has BBIQ, just means he is realistic ( if we are kind) in differentiating what he can and can not do.

  2. #77
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    ability to run a team!
    Manu does that from the 2.

    Manu is a point guard in a 2 guard body, tbh.

  3. #78
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    Manu does that from the 2.

    Manu is a point guard in a 2 guard body, tbh.
    but Manu can't defend the point and if he would have to run a team in a constantly way it will wear him out, generally Manu is a two guard!

  4. #79
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    but Manu can't defend the point
    He can't?

    News to me.

    and if he would have to run a team in a constantly way it will wear him out, generally Manu is a two guard!
    So you're saying the reason he's not a 1 is because he's not durable and can't defend other point guards?

    Neat.

  5. #80
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    He can't?

    News to me.



    So you're saying the reason he's not a 1 is because he's not durable and can't defend other point guards?

    Neat.
    Kind of like saying TP isn't a PG because his assist stats aren't in double figures, right?

  6. #81
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    You guys are getting trolled. Arguing this point without a common set of criteria as to what defines a PG is committing yourselves to a battle with no chance of winning.

  7. #82
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    Mel_13 with the obligatory "you guys are getting trolled" goods.

  8. #83
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    Kind of like saying TP isn't a PG because his assist stats aren't in double figures, right?
    No.

    You said TP has a "classic set of point guard skills"

    Define "classic set of point guard skills."

    While you're at it, please do me a favor and define "classic set of shooting guard skills" so that we can be on the same page. Thanks.

  9. #84
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    Arguing this point without a common set of criteria as to what defines a PG is committing yourselves to a battle with no chance of winning.
    Pretty much.

  10. #85
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    No.

    You said TP has a "classic set of point guard skills"

    Define "classic set of point guard skills."

    While you're at it, please do me a favor and define "classic set of shooting guard skills" so that we can be on the same page. Thanks.
    Nope. Defining SG skills has nothing to do with my argument. You brought Manu into this. You're deflecting. I'm not playing.

    I will defend my statment by defining what I believe to be classic PG skills:

    1. Running the offense (calling plays and sets, execution)
    2. Ball handling and passing (low turnovers, court vision)
    3. Lane penetration (collapsing defenses, opening perimeter)
    4. Shooting and scoring (decent outside shot to keep defender honest and abilityto finish in the paint)
    5. Defense (keep opposing PGs from accomplishing 1-4)

  11. #86
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    Nope. Defining SG skills has nothing to do with my argument. You brought Manu into this. You're deflecting. I'm not playing.
    I'm not deflecting. A list of shooting guard skills would be great to check off to see which Tony fits into more.

    I will defend my statment by defining what I believe to be classic PG skills:

    1. Running the offense (calling plays and sets, execution)
    2. Ball handling and passing (low turnovers, court vision)
    3. Lane penetration (collapsing defenses, opening perimeter)
    4. Shooting and scoring (decent outside shot to keep defender honest and abilityto finish in the paint)
    5. Defense (keep opposing PGs from accomplishing 1-4)
    1. A. If Gary Neal can do it, is it really a skill?
    1. B. Manu runs the offense at times. Is he a point guard?

    2-3. Doesn't Manu do that from the 2?

    4-5. Pretty standard skills at any position.

    You've helped further convince me that Manu is really a 1.
    Not much there to convince me that Parker isn't more of a true 2 than a 1.

  12. #87
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    I'm not deflecting. A list of shooting guard skills would be great to check off to see which Tony fits into more.



    1. A. If Gary Neal can do it, is it really a skill?
    1. B. Manu runs the offense at times. Is he a point guard?
    Dgf
    2-3. Doesn't Manu do that from the 2?

    4-5. Pretty standard skills at any position.

    You've helped further convince me that Manu is really a 1.
    Not much there to convince me that Parker isn't more of a true 2 than a 1.
    Again, I am not debating whether or not Manu possesses PG skills. I defined and defended my statement that was in response to your assertion that Parker is not a PG because he does not average double figure assists. The point which you continue to evade and deflect.

  13. #88
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    Again, I am not debating whether or not Manu possesses PG skills. I defined and defended my statement that was in response to your assertion that Parker is not a PG because he does not average double figure assists. The point which you continue to evade and deflect.
    lol evade and deflect. My opinion must mean a lot to you.

    His low assist totals are just one of several reasons I don't see Tony as a classic point guard.

  14. #89
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    lol evade and deflect. My opinion must mean a lot to you.

    His low assist totals are just one of several reasons I don't see Tony as a classic point guard.
    Not really, no. You're engaging me as much as I'm engaging you tbh.

    Why don't you define the specific skills Parker lacks that keeps him from being a PG despite the fact that it is the position that he actually plays?

  15. #90
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    Not really, no. You're engaging me as much as I'm engaging you tbh.
    you engaged first. I'm just being polite.

    Why don't you define the specific skills Parker lacks that keeps him from being a PG despite the fact that it is the position that he actually plays?
    Plain and simple, he's a scorer more than a passer. Is that something that anyone really disagrees with me on?

  16. #91
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    you engaged first. I'm just being polite.
    OK


    Plain and simple, he's a scorer more than a passer. Is that something that anyone really disagrees with me on?
    So, he's a scoring PG? Was Isiah Thomas a PG or a SG? Are you suggesting that Parker has no passing skills?

  17. #92
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Plain and simple, he's a scorer more than a passer. Is that something that anyone really disagrees with me on?
    4th in the NBA in assist % (trailing only Nash, Paul, and D. Williams):

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/...der_by=ast_pct


    12th in the NBA in point per minute:

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/..._by=pts_per_mp

    The objective evidence says that he's a PG who scores very well.

  18. #93
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    A scoring PG it is! Are we done now?

  19. #94
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    So, he's a scoring PG?
    Imo, yes.

    A 2 guard in a 1 guard's body, imo.

    Was Isiah Thomas a PG or a SG? Are you suggesting that Parker has no passing skills?
    Isiah averaged 9 assists for his career. Easily a point guard.

    And no to the 2nd question.

    Lol clearly my opinion doesn't matter to you.

  20. #95
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135

  21. #96
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    Imo, yes.

    A 2 guard in a 1 guard's body, imo.



    Isiah averaged 9 assists for his career. Easily a point guard.

    And no to the 2nd question.

    Lol clearly my opinion doesn't matter to you.
    So, according to you a player is a PG if they average over how many assists for their careers?

  22. #97
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    So, according to you a player is a PG if they average over how many assists for their careers?
    I've never really thought much about it.

    I just know that Tony's career assist average is rather low to call him a classic point guard.

  23. #98
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,713
    Next up: my opinion on whether Duncan is a true power forward or not.

  24. #99
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    Next up: my opinion on whether Duncan is a true power forward or not.
    Will that one end terribly with you resorting to "you care about my opinion" schtick?

  25. #100
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Ranking all players who played at least 100 games over the past 20 NBA seasons in terms of assist percentage. Tony Parker ranks 38th out of 1040 players at 32.5%. For comparison, Isiah Thomas ranks 21st at 36%.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/...der_by=ast_pct

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •