Reply With Quote
"Oh not this again"
Key witness to RFK assassination says Sirhan Sirhan didn’t act alone
A key witness to the 1968 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy has retracted her official statements in the case and now claims that convicted assassin Sirhan Sirhan did not act alone.
Nina Rhodes-Hughes, 78, tells CNN that the FBI "twisted" her original statements to authorities. In recent court filings led by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, state prosecutors argue that even if there were a second gunman on the scene, Sirhan is still guilty of murder.
"What has to come out is that there was another shooter to my right," Rhodes told CNN. "The truth has got to be told. No more cover-ups."
Rhodes' original FBI statement says she only heard 8 gunshots at the time and makes no mention of a second shooter. However, Rhodes, who was just feet away from Kennedy says she never claimed to have only heard 8 shots.
"I never said eight shots. I never, never said it. There were more than eight shots," she told CNN. "There were at least 12, maybe 14. And I know there were because I heard the rhythm in my head."
Last November, Sirhan's attorneys announced they were filing a challenge to the verdict, alleging a conspiracy by authorities in the case. They are asking that Sirhan be released from prison. His attorneys argue that Sirhan was the victim of a malicious form of "hypo programming" that falsely caused him to believe he was RFK's assassin.
"For me it's hopeful and sad that it's only coming out now instead of before -- but at least now instead of never," Rhodes told CNN.
Rhodes was never called as a witness in Sirhan's trial but claims she gave an interview shortly after the shooting during which she claimed to have heard at least a dozen shots.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow...223905927.html
"Oh not this again"
Not sure I can wait 40 years for the truth about WTC7
hmmm...
Then don't.
Make it up like you and your buddies have been.
Who?
cares
Those who respond in this thread
Look SA.
I never followed the RFK shooting. I never even knew there was any controversy over it. Never liked the criminal. JFK, however, I think was one of the best presidents ever.
Really now...
Now that we have issues with the Arab world, they are using a conspiracy defense?
Surely they have ballistics that matched the bullets and gun.
Mind control...
Possible, but unlikely i say, to that effectiveness.
Who cares?
Seriously Dude what is your major malfunction?
You just disagree with any point I make. If I say the sky is blue you say its really a dark aqua.
Why wouldn't you want to know why WTC7 came down in under 10 seconds?
Why are you so Anal about finding the truth?
Do you get laid at least twice a year?
And before you get all sensitive that is a serious question.
whats it going to take for you to ever agree with me or support any of my points on any subject?
It's bad enough you Bailed on the Evolution age of the Earth debate now you want me to wax your ass about 9/11? "again"
you
do.
you
did
read
the
topic
and
re
plied
Mouse... Some of the evidence you guys say is proof is absolutely ridiculous. most is easily explained, some not so, yet because you guys don't understand reality, you say something is wrong.
It was more like 13 seconds. I do believe it was heat and damaged structure, like they say.
Absolutely. Sometimes more than twice a day, but then I eat bananas, and keep my potassium levels up.
I'm sure I've agreed with you on something in the past. Just not these conspiracy theories.
Huh...
I don't even remember what I said on that, but I do remember you has some silly examples.
Did you really go to MIT?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
