Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 302
  1. #76
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    It may indeed.

    When anybody brings up any effective criticisms against him, or his precious list, that is what he does.

    Dude is like some Denier smeagol... preciousssss lissssst....





    Speaking of precioussss lissssst


    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...20&postcount=2


    Yay! I win!

  2. #77
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561

    Now, ask yourself the following critial thinking questions:

    Did I directly state anything was true? If so, what was that?

    There are two statements there.

    1. "900/200000= 0.45%"

    and

    2. "If memory serves the body of work is on the order of 200,000 papers"

    Then what was your point?



    Consensus fallacy is argumentum ad populum.

  3. #78
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Then what was your point?



    Consensus fallacy is argumentum ad populum.
    My point was to ask about the entire body of evidence, of which his list is a subset.

    I pointed out that his claim about that is a strawman.

    He hasn't hesitated to call me out on anything he thinks is wrong or logicall flawed or unfair.

    Why do you think he is ignoring my post/claim, Darrin?

    Put the words down before you cut yourself, because you don't know how to use them.

  4. #79
    Moss is Da Sauce! mouse's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    26,358
    Originally Posted by RandomGuy

    punk ass and not backing it up.

    I will say again:

    you.


    you are a selfish, short-sighted ,

    This is the same guy that gave me a hard time and threaten not to post in a topic anymore cuz i called him RandomLie?

  5. #80
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    lol ing about personal insults then starting a butthurt thread about it...

  6. #81
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    My point was to ask about the entire body of evidence, of which his list is a subset.

    I pointed out that his claim about that is a strawman.

    He hasn't hesitated to call me out on anything he thinks is wrong or logicall flawed or unfair.

    Why do you think he is ignoring my post/claim, Darrin?

    Put the words down before you cut yourself, because you don't know how to use them.

    lol



    punk ass and not backing it up.

    I will say again:

    you.


    you are a selfish, short-sighted ,

  7. #82
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Then what was your point?



    Consensus fallacy is argumentum ad populum.
    Its great how how guys found a new Latin term to toss around and use but its such a shallow use that its ridiculous. When someone points out the vast majority of papers point to a certain position they are not basing the authority of that statement on the numbers alone. They are basing them on the numbers of experts with the best ability to judge the field. There is definitely a logic behind believing what is pretty much a statistical certainty in this situation.

    But sure, keep going with your ad populum stuff instead of asking exactly WHY the sheer number of papers is what it is.

  8. #83
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Randomguy guy got mad at us for accusing him of lying or ing up and not bothering to back it up.

    Why can't we just accuse people of without backing it up?

    Evidence and proving stuff is so *hard*

    waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!

    Maybe if I complain about it, everyone will ignore how we can't back up what we say. (sniff)





    Butthurt thread delivers

  9. #84
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    This is the same guy that gave me a hard time and threaten not to post in a topic anymore cuz i called him RandomLie?
    On a slightly more serious note;

    I was cranky. It didn't really bother me that much, and I overreacted.

    Please accept my apologies for that one.

    I'm sure it was my beard getting the better of me. I have shaved it off now, so I feel a lot better. :p

  10. #85
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Summer beards suck.

  11. #86
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Eh, I refuse to shave it off!

  12. #87
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Eh, I refuse to shave it off!
    You really should though


  13. #88
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Can't play the role of a dirty liberal academic without the beard. Sorry, it stays.

  14. #89
    Irrefutable Poptech's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    694
    But sure, keep going with your ad populum stuff instead of asking exactly WHY the sheer number of papers is what it is.
    1. There is no "sheer" number of papers supporting ACC/AGW Alarm.

    2. The "number" is an argumentum ad populum.

  15. #90
    Moss is Da Sauce! mouse's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    26,358
    You really should though

    That's not a bearded woman its a man in a dress.

  16. #91
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    1. There is no "sheer" number of papers supporting ACC/AGW Alarm.

    2. The "number" is an argumentum ad populum.
    The number is only ad populum if you stop at the number. Shallow analysis is your forte.

  17. #92
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    Poptech,

    don't know you and I'm not sure if you're aware of this yet but RandomGuy is the board authority on logically arguing most issues IMHO.

  18. #93
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Poptech,

    don't know you and I'm not sure if you're aware of this yet but RandomGuy is the board authority on logically arguing most issues IMHO.
    No...

    He just thinks he is because he uses big words. He takes an educational elitism approach, rather than talking a common language. I love the fact that PopTech beats him at his own game.

  19. #94
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    1. There is no "sheer" number of papers supporting ACC/AGW Alarm.

    2. The "number" is an argumentum ad populum.
    You don't get to do that.

    It is not an argumentum ad populum, simply because you say it is.

    Prove it. We all know you can't.

  20. #95
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    My opinion is wrong? Ok bro

  21. #96
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    cobra can't get him enough of that pop!

  22. #97
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    My opinion is wrong? Ok bro
    LOL...

    We all have our opinions. Fine with me if that's your opinion. I just disagree.

    -and-

    Sorry... You did write it as your opinion, and I didn't do the same. My last post is my opinion as well.

  23. #98
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Randomguy isn't an expert in logic because he uses big words and kicks my ass. I will claim he doesn't ever do that, and pretend that my new hero PopTech has responded to his ass whooping.

    Maybe you will pick up the gauntlet that darrin so rightly left on the ground.

    PopTech has not hesitated to claim I have made all manner of logical fallacies, and lies.

    I directly accuse him of a logical fallacy and in, essence, lying here:

    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...3&postcount=32

    He has not added it to his list, nor responded to it.

    (whips out the big boy fonts)

    What does that tell you about the point I made?

  24. #99
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Well, it doesn't count as cherry picking because this is a comprehensive list of YOUR logical fallacies and not his.

  25. #100
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    My opinion is wrong? Ok bro
    As Afro noted:

    I see all of the Randomguy butthurt club is out in full force..
    In my experience, those who scream about other people lying about them the most, tend to be the quickest to turn around and do the same thing. Pyschological projection of ones at udes on others.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •