Economic Freedom & Quality of Life

[clambake]

See.

There you go lying again. When will you ever stop? I get very tired of your relentless lies.

He did not say what you just repeated.

good god, have you set a date?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

He's just your prototypical sophist, much like Cobra. They're not here to "debate" anything. They also think it's personal.

I think that RG is right in terming his a sociopath. I don't think he is emotionally capable of admitting that someone else is wrong.

Narcissistic personality disorder

Last reviewed: November 14, 2010.

Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition in which people have an inflated sense of self-importance and an extreme preoccupation with themselves.
Causes, incidence, and risk factors

The causes of this disorder are unknown. An overly sensitive personality and parenting problems may affect the development of this disorder.
Symptoms

A person with narcissistic personality disorder may:

React to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation check

Take advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals check

Have excessive feelings of self-importance check

Exaggerate achievements and talents check

Be preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty, intelligence, or ideal love check

Have unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment check

Need constant attention and admiration check

Disregard the feelings of others, and have little ability to feel empathy check

Have obsessive self-interest check

Pursue mainly selfish goals check

Signs and tests

Like other personality disorders, narcissistic personality disorder is diagnosed based on a psychological evaluation and the history and severity of the symptoms.
Treatment

Psychotherapy (for example, talk therapy) may help the affected person relate to other people in a more positive and compassionate way.
Expectations (prognosis)

The outcome depends on the severity of the disorder.
Complications

Alcohol or other drug dependence

Relationship, work, and family problems

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001930/

[ElNono]

I think that RG is right in terming his a sociopath. I don't think he is emotionally capable of admitting that someone else is wrong.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001930/

Meh, I don't think he's that important.

[RandomGuy]

Meh, I don't think he's that important.

If you thumb through his website, and follow the links to the places he has been debating this for years, and read both, it gets creeeepy real fast.

Don't take my word for it.

Visit his website.

Then go here:

http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2011/...ain-900-times/

... and see how he reacts when this link is posted.

[RandomGuy]

Meh, I don't think he's that important.

He isn't. You are right.

He was new and shiny.

Now... he's just creepy.

[clambake]

wc, you gotta go to that website.

just drink him in, baby.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

wc, you gotta go to that website.

just drink him in, baby.

[Wild Cobra]

Wow...

Let's try this again:

I actually pointed out that his entire post was simply representing a one sided opinion, something he didn't deny. I asked him if he had any differing views, and he said he's not supposed to present such views.

See.

There you go lying again. When will you ever stop? I get very tired of your relentless lies.

He did not say what you just repeated.

Do you have anything not written by libertarians, Cato, Koch, Heritage, Austrian believers, etc?

I asked him if he had any differing views,

and he said he's not supposed to present such views.

I don't see where he said "he is not suppose to present." Why are you a chronic liar?

Am I supposed to have something written by a Marxist promoting a free-market reason for the economic crisis?

I'm not objecting, but why not? Do you actually read opposing views at all or you just do your reading merely to feed your confirmation bias?

Why would I recommend a view I didn't agree with? Of course I read opposing views.

Yes, I highlighted something I thing you dismissed. Please however, tell me how is said he is not suppose to. Why is it his duty to present your argument?

How do you twist the question: "Am I suppose to" into claiming "I am not suppose to?"

[clambake]

jesus christ! you naked?

[RandomGuy]

I think that RG is right in terming his a sociopath. I don't think he is emotionally capable of admitting that someone else is wrong.



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001930/

You know, the more I read, the more I think you got it spot on.

Psychiatrist Glen Gabbard suggested NPD could be broken down into two subtypes.[22] He saw the "oblivious" subtype as being grandiose, arrogant, and thick-skinned and the "hypervigilant" subtype as being easily hurt, oversensitive, and ashamed. In his view, the oblivious subtype presents for admiration, envy, and appreciation a powerful, grandiose self that is the an hesis of a weak internalized self, which hides in shame, while the hypervigilant subtype neutralizes devaluation by seeing others as unjust abusers

It also makes me feel a bit sorry for being so mean.

But behind this mask of ultra-confidence lies a fragile self-esteem, vulnerable to the slightest criticism.

[Poptech]

If you thumb through his website, and follow the links to the places he has been debating this for years, and read both, it gets creeeepy real fast.

This is a nice lie.

http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2011/...ain-900-times/

Rebuttal to Greenfyre - "Poptart gets burned again, 900 times"

[Poptech]

I think that RG is right in terming his a sociopath. I don't think he is emotionally capable of admitting that someone else is wrong.

So this is your new libelous claim? I have admitted you are wrong many times.

[RandomGuy]

So this is your new libelous claim? I have admitted your are wrong many times.

I have admitted you are wrong a lot too.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Second verse, same as the first.

I think that RG is right in terming his a sociopath. I don't think he is emotionally capable of admitting that he is wrong or someone else is right.

Narcissistic personality disorder

Last reviewed: November 14, 2010.

Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition in which people have an inflated sense of self-importance and an extreme preoccupation with themselves.
Causes, incidence, and risk factors

The causes of this disorder are unknown. An overly sensitive personality and parenting problems may affect the development of this disorder.
Symptoms

A person with narcissistic personality disorder may:

React to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation check

Take advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals check

Have excessive feelings of self-importance check

Exaggerate achievements and talents check

Be preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty, intelligence, or ideal love check

Have unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment check

Need constant attention and admiration check

Disregard the feelings of others, and have little ability to feel empathy check

Have obsessive self-interest check

Pursue mainly selfish goals check

Signs and tests

Like other personality disorders, narcissistic personality disorder is diagnosed based on a psychological evaluation and the history and severity of the symptoms.
Treatment

Psychotherapy (for example, talk therapy) may help the affected person relate to other people in a more positive and compassionate way.
Expectations (prognosis)

The outcome depends on the severity of the disorder.
Complications

Alcohol or other drug dependence

Relationship, work, and family problems

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001930/

[RandomGuy]

Seriously though.

Poptech, you are going on ignore for a whole bunch of reasons. Start crowing now.

I give up.

You win.

[ElNono]

Wow...

Let's try this again:

He did not say what you just repeated.

I actually pointed out that his entire post was simply representing a one sided opinion, something he didn't deny.

So you don't have anything. Okay. It's a lot of links pointing to the same side of the coin.

I asked him if he had any differing views,

Do you have anything not written by libertarians, Cato, Koch, Heritage, Austrian believers, etc?

and he said he's not supposed to present such views.

Am I supposed to have something written by a Marxist promoting a free-market reason for the economic crisis?

Stop lying, dumbass

[Poptech]

I actually pointed out that his entire post was simply representing a one sided opinion, something he didn't deny. I asked him if he had any differing views, and he said he's not supposed to present such views.

That's why I asked why not?

We're dealing with opinion here. There's no right or wrong. Different opinions are as valid is his, whether he found them "logical" or not.

So you are stating the obvious. Are you really this slow?

I've noticed this trend here of mind reading positions and then attempting psuedo-intellectual rhetoric to validate their false belief they are logical. It is tedious and boring.

[ElNono]

I don't see where he said "he is not suppose to present."

Do you even know what a rhetorical question is? I know your english is weak, but there's no excuse for dumb.

[Wild Cobra]

Stop lying, dumbass

Are you saying that the start of the sentence "Am I suppose to have.... " is not worded as a question?

[ElNono]

So you are stating the obvious. Are you really this slow?

We would've gotten here a long time ago if you weren't absolutely paranoid.

I've noticed this trend here of mind reading positions and then attempting psuedo-intellectual rhetoric to validate their false belief they are logical. It is tedious and boring.

I don't really care what you think about it. You're free not to participate in it.

lol IP address

[ElNono]

Are you saying that the start of the sentence "Am I suppose to have.... " is not worded as a question?

Do you even know what a rhetorical question is? I know your english is weak, but there's no excuse for dumb.

[Wild Cobra]

Do you even know what a rhetorical question is? I know your english is weak, but there's no excuse for dumb.

It's your extrapolation I argue against. You are claiming he said he "is not suppose to." He did not say that. You are effectively lying.

Is it his responsibility to have on hand such material? That's how I see his question to you.

[clambake]

anybody know the hookup history on spurstalk?

[Wild Cobra]

ElNono...

I see you doing the same thing you constantly do with me. You reword a persons argument to suit the answer you want to give. Think about every time I called you out as a liar for this tactic. Why not just ask Poptech if your reworded question was his intent or not?

[clambake]

ElNono...

I see you doing the same thing you constantly do with me. You reword a persons argument to suit the answer you want to give. Think about every time I called you out as a liar for this tactic. Why not just ask Poptech if your reworded question was his intent or not?

why don't you ask him.......you know....later?