Reply With Quote
How's compiling IP addresses working out for you?How is compiling the strawman arguments going?
How is compiling the strawman arguments going?IP addresses
How's compiling IP addresses working out for you?How is compiling the strawman arguments going?
Like I said how is compiling your strawman arguments going?How's compiling IP addresses working out for you?
Not of not adding value.It's not an agreement.It's not a disagreement.
I'll wait for you to admit you're wrong.
No, like how's compiling IP addresses working out for you?
I'm not.No, like how's compiling IP addresses working out for you?
I will stop cuckolding El Nono's wife and give my praise to the first person who produces a link to where Chumpdumper has ever made an argument in the political forum.
No, like how's compiling IP addresses working out for you?
But you wish you were
I make mistakes at times. I have acknowledged this. However, when I do clarify, and you refuse to acknowledge my clarification, and continue to respond like I never clarified...
Who's the idiot? It's you. Not me.
Actually, it's nothing like that. You state a claim very clearly (shooting illegals, black surgeons, etc), then when you get called out on it, you never walk away from the claim. You rarely, if ever, say you were wrong or that you changed your mind (all valid and understandable positions). You pull the "that's not what I really meant", or "you don't understand" card, when what you said was clear as a day.
And, again, I'm far from the only one pointing this out. And it's far from being just "lef s" pointing it out too.
Bad example. Why do you bring up something I haven't revised? What's wrong with shooting foreign invaders? It's my opinion and that hasn't changed. I'm not talking about something that I don't clarify. When you clearly have the wrong impression, or purposely reply and including a misstated paraphrase of my view.
Why are you using an example that doesn't apply?
Exhibit A.
Again, you are changing the subject. You are not addressing my complaint.
I addressed your complaint. You don't have to agree with it.Again, you are changing the subject. You are not addressing my complaint.
No you didn't. You grabbed an example that most people disagree with me on. That is not explaining your lies.
I don't lie. The examples are as good as any other.
When you say dumb things you get called out for them. Deal with it.
I do deal with it. I am complaining about when you make a sentence that improperly reflects what I say, and answer to something I didn't say. That is an effective lie of my position when you do that.
Do you really not see the truth during the times I have pointed it out?
I don't believe you are that stupid.
Clambake has dominated this thread.
As for the actual argument going on.......ElNono, just stop. You aren't going to win. You can't beat delusional.
ElNono...
Do you know what paraphrase means?
Now my complaint is that you often incorrectly restate the intent of what someone says, and then answer something that was never said or implied. Instead on "giving meaning in another form," you change the meaning.Definition of PARAPHRASE
1: a restatement of a text, passage, or work giving the meaning in another form
I don't have halfbake on ignore, but I normally ignore what the troll says.
Dominate...
LOL...
You are joking, right?
I don't care what you complain about or how you feel about it. Having a differing opinion over your absurd posts isn't lying.
But if you think it's lying, go ahead. Who cares?
I know what it means. What your point?
Paraphrasing someone's words when it changes the meaning is a lie.I don't care what you complain about or how you feel about it. Having a differing opinion over your absurd posts isn't lying.
But if you think it's lying, go ahead. Who cares?
Deal with it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
