Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Veteran InRareForm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    8,644

  2. #2
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Speculation that a dinosaur's digestive system is like the mammals of today?

  3. #3
    Veteran InRareForm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    8,644

  4. #4
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117

  5. #5
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Thought this might be from The Onion. Even more hilarious that it is serious.

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    WSJ, a Murdoch/UCA/financial-sector cheerleader/propagandist, is always to be doubted.

  7. #7
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    WSJ, a Murdoch/UCA/financial-sector cheerleader/propagandist, is always to be doubted.
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-...istoric-earth/

  8. #8
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/17953792

    Damn...that Murdoch controls everybody!

  9. #9
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Its an interesting theory. Cretaceous warming is a strong subject of debate right now because even at very high CO2 concentrations you see warmth in that time that is very difficult to explain. The sun was dimmer and had a reduced output at that time which only adds to the questions.

    I know very little about the paleontology of that (or any) period so I can't comment on how good these estimates are (although I gather that even the scientists making them admit to making some large assumptions) but given that cattle and land animals today make up huge contributions to the methane budget I don't find any reason to dismiss the idea out of hand.

  10. #10
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Its an interesting theory. Cretaceous warming is a strong subject of debate right now because even at very high CO2 concentrations you see warmth in that time that is very difficult to explain. The sun was dimmer and had a reduced output at that time which only adds to the questions.

    I know very little about the paleontology of that (or any) period so I can't comment on how good these estimates are (although I gather that even the scientists making them admit to making some large assumptions) but given that cattle and land animals today make up huge contributions to the methane budget I don't find any reason to dismiss the idea out of hand.
    Well, if you read the PDF I linked, at least the wording is acceptable. They make no hard claims. Just possibilities.

    Was the sun dimmer, or is that an assumption? I won't claim to know either, but there are too many variables anyway, that far back, that would be impossible to know. We really don't know the orbit of the earth then. Maybe we were closer. Maybe somehow the atmosphere was denser, and some solar incident and/or loss of magnetic field allowed the solar winds to carry some of it away. We can only speculate.

  11. #11
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    We don't know the orbit of the earth back then? Really? You won't claim to know either way then you'll claim to know things that you are completely wrong about?

    SMH

  12. #12
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    We don't know the orbit of the earth back then? Really? You won't claim to know either way then you'll claim to know things that you are completely wrong about?

    SMH

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •