Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 34 of 34
  1. #26
    Irrefutable Poptech's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    694
    no, why should they? They have easy, low-hanging-fruit $Ts before them from carbon energy depletion. Many decades before transport is running on something other than carbon fuel. short-term-itis rules.
    Multinational corporations never plan for the future this has been their secret to success all along! Who knew?

  2. #27
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Multinational corporations never plan for the future this has been their secret to success all along! Who knew?
    It's difficult to reason with ShazBot.

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Multinational corporations never plan for the future this has been their secret to success all along! Who knew?
    The oilcos know the forseeable is all oil. Industrial civilization is based on oil, and nothing's going to change that for decades. Why waste the profits on non-oil research when they get much better return spending a few $10Ms on buying legislators and scientists to deny global warming and undercut alternatives.

  4. #29
    Irrefutable Poptech's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    694
    The oilcos know the forseeable is all oil. Industrial civilization is based on oil, and nothing's going to change that for decades. Why waste the profits on non-oil research when they get much better return spending a few $10Ms on buying legislators and scientists to deny global warming and undercut alternatives.
    So your argument is an energy company should be investing in alternative energy when that investment would be illogical?

    Cite and quote where an energy company "denies" "global warming".

    Please provide evidence of energy company corruption from a single skeptical scientist on global warming. Make sure to demonstrate how this scientist changed their position on the subject.

    Please provide the process by which an economically viable alternative source of energy is prevented from entering the market by an energy company.

    I fail to see your grand energy company "conspiracy" controlling the entire world's choice in energy sources.

  5. #30
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "So your argument is an energy company should be investing in alternative energy when that investment would be illogical"

    no, strawman. oil/carbon companies won't invest in alternative energy, and are/will continue to spew propaganda to protect their dominance. solar/wind/water energy companies expand alternative energy.

    scientists with financial support from oil have taken positions against AGW. do you own research.

    "I fail to see your grand energy company "conspiracy" controlling the entire world's choice in energy sources."

    API, PNAC Kock Bros, all the big oil cos pay millions to drive the AGW-denial propaganda, pay millions to legislators to keep their tax expenditures and subsidies, and they DO control the oil/gas supplies. US's presence ins the M/E and the invasion of Iraq were MIC/oilco oil grabs.

  6. #31
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Leave it to the usual parties to knock what is going to make some people a lot of money while being green at the same time.
    lol

  7. #32
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Chinese farmer invents 'wind-powered' car

    http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/...d-powered-car/





  8. #33
    Irrefutable Poptech's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    694
    no, strawman. oil/carbon companies won't invest in alternative energy, and are/will continue to spew propaganda to protect their dominance. solar/wind/water energy companies expand alternative energy.
    Please provide the process by which an economically viable alternative source of energy is prevented from entering the market by an energy company.

    scientists with financial support from oil have taken positions against AGW. do you own research.
    There is no evidence of any such corruption of scientists only your conspiracy theories. I've done the research.

    Please provide evidence of energy company corruption from a single skeptical scientist on global warming. Make sure to demonstrate how this scientist changed their position on the subject.

    API, PNAC Kock Bros, all the big oil cos pay millions to drive the AGW-denial propaganda, pay millions to legislators to keep their tax expenditures and subsidies, and they DO control the oil/gas supplies. US's presence ins the M/E and the invasion of Iraq were MIC/oilco oil grabs.
    Wrong again they do not control the world's oil/gas supplies, 95% of the world's known oil and gas reserves are controlled by national oil companies (Forbes)

    You need to do better research as all your energy conspiracy theories are laughably ignorant.

  9. #34
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    You need to do better research as all your energy conspiracy theories are laughably ignorant.
    I think Mork's phrase "Shazbot" fits him well. His way of saying , and Bouton's is a Bot.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •