It would be quite a coup if the Spurs could flip Blair to improve their position in the upcoming June NBA Draft.
Getting a project big is NOT an unrealistic notion. After all it just in 2005 that the Spurs invested in a never-before-heard-from French prospect named Ian Mahinmi. My point is that it's not an impossible task. The reason I bring up Sims is that he's a projected "late" second round pick. He's 22 years old, meaning most teams are going to be scared off by his age AND he's considered a late bloomer. Here's the book on Sims, according to one source:
http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/article/3821
I agree the Spurs are not set and that they now have an opportunity to correct some of their size and skill disadvantages. Resigning Diaw should push Blair off the roster entirely. Lorbek would hopefully and eventually push Bonner off the roster.
It would be quite a coup if the Spurs could flip Blair to improve their position in the upcoming June NBA Draft.
I'd keep Blair as a 5th big in that scenario unless I could sign/draft a developmental player with defense and rebounding skills as a 5th big. Bonner/Blair is a below-average pairing, but if Duncan or Splitter went down, Bonner/Lorbek would have us absolutely pining for Blair. They both suck at the same things.
I get the feeling one if not both bigs for the lakers get traded in this offseason
lakers with only one big is a total different game for them
He's on a rookie contract and will likely be playing for the Toros. Nobody but the Spurs can call him up. He'll still count as being on the Spurs 15 man roster.
I have the feeling that another George Hill-type trade is in the works for the Spurs. I think we'll end up with a player that NOBODY saw us getting.
Can we still trade him?
Yes, if he has any trade value. Given that he's a complete developmental player on a guaranteed contract, I'm skeptical about that.
Oh, I guess he has. My point is that Spurs dont need both
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)