I keep hearing all these guys on ESPN and whatnot talking about the Lakers trading to improve their team, but they keep saying Kobe is off limits. I'm not sure why that is, when he's aging, getting worse, and expensive as . They keep talking about trading Bynum when he's potentially their future. They should be building around him, not sticking with Kobe who has been shooting them out of games instead of running actual plays the coach draws up. I've never seen a player take dumber shots than Kobe who don't just get benched besides Allen Iverson.
When their offense struggles, the experts always say, "oh, well Kobe had to shoot and go 4-14 in the 4th because the rest of the team went 2-7". And it's like wait a minute, could the fact that Kobe shot twice as much as the rest of the team possibly have anything to do with it? Oh, I guess not. It's Kobe, it's not any other player in the NBA.
Anyway, I think the Lakers should trade Kobe. . .not Bynum. Gasol? Sure maybe, depending on what you can get back. But why not just trade Kobe too? I don't see why he should be off limits besides that he's just a big name. Would any Lakers fan seriously not trade Kobe for LeBron right now? Or for Derrick Rose? Or for Durant? Don't lie. Not that any of those teams would make that trade, but hypothetically speaking.
If anything, they won't discuss Kobe trade talks because they know nobody will trade for him and his bloated contract. LA needs to keep Bynum badly and build around that dude. Riding it out with Kobe will spell their team's doom.
In fact, I guarantee the Lakers don't win another le as long as Kobe's on the team. Book it. I said the same thing last year too well before the Mavs broke it off in their behinds in the 2nd round.
Kobe has no trade value, he has one of the worst contracts in NBA history..he's still a top 10 player, but there isn't a team that would take on a 30 million$ a year contract..
They won't amnesty Kobe, as the backlash would be too damaging..he's one of the 3 best Lakers of all-time, they wouldn't move him IMO..
This, plus he provides a ridiculous amount of revenue to the Laker franchise strictly because he's, well, Kobe. People will always pay major bucks to watch him play, and the NBA is a business first and foremost.
the revenue alone makes him valuable. he has a no trade so if the lakers do find value he can just say no. an amnesty is basically taking a season.
Also, some people don't seem to realize the God-like status that Kobe has in LA..he causes the most delusional reactions that I've ever seen from a fanbase, tbh..everything he does is overhyped by the Lakers fanbase, he always receives the least amount of blame, and he always receives most of the credit..
There would be riots if Kobe left LA..
I disagree that he's a top 10 player
I'm pretty sure he has a 'no trade' clause in his contract too
While he's skilled and still very athletic, he's 33, doesn't make his team mates better, is owed $60M for the next two seasons and has a no-trade clause in his contract.
Last edited by dunkman; 05-24-2012 at 03:00 AM.
He does.
Kobe is not top 10 player anymore
He is a great player.
And he is a Top 5 player (Lebron, Durant, Wade... Rose? CP3? So he is around there).
But his contract is horrible. Aside of the no-trade clause, his contract is a cap killer by itself.
only reason his even top5 or whatever crap selections to all nba teams...dude is nothing but a volume scorer meaningless stats
Because trading him will hurt the Lakers revenue-wise more than it will help them.
He is not top 5.
He has 3 years for a league leading, by far, 25 million per year contract remaining. That is crazy.
His contract is bull basketball wise, but as stated, considering his god like status in LA, is worth it for them giving them a cult following and excess revenue created.
Pau and Bynum make a great PF/C combo. The Lakers might be better off on the court to trade Kobe and his 25 million contract elsehwere, thus keeping their two talented 7 footers.
A trade that could make the Lakers better off is with New Jersey.
Derron Williams and Gerarld Wallace for Kobe. Salaries are pretty similar. Lakers get an awesome Point guard and athletic all around SF in Wallace.
Bynum
Gasol
Wallace
?
Williams
Luol Deng and Derek Rose for Kobe
Bynum
Gasol
Deng
?
Rose
Chicago would never do that but you see what i'm saying. They could get some great pieces for Kobe while keeping their two headed interior monster.
There's heaps of options the Lakers could pursue to make their team better and utilize there 2 fantastic bigs better. The Lakers strength is on the interior but Kobe is a detriment to that. Multi Talented 7 footers don't grow on trees..
Last edited by Russo21; 05-24-2012 at 07:22 AM.
why not trade kobe? dude has a clause in his contract by which he can veto any trade, the only way to get rid of him is using the amnesty provision imho
So pretty much the main consensus here is that Kobe's good for merchandise and ticket sales, not for actual winning? I guess that makes sense. It sure as isn't because he's making the team much better. For a guy that some argue has borderline Jordan-status, he sure as is a LOT worse than Jordan was at that age.
He is not top 5 and hasn't been for at least 2-3 years now.
LeBron
Howard
Durant
Wade
Rose
Paul
Anthony
Westbrook (yeah I said it)
Ginobili (when healthy. He was better than Kobe last year)
Bynum
Williams (Deron)
Parker
Randolph (when healthy)
Dirk
Love
I would take those 15 before Kobe right now. Some of them have health issues, but when healthy, better than Kobe. Imo, you could only "argue off" maybe 3-4 dudes from that list max, and I'd disagree with each one. I'm not talkin about stats either, I'm talkin about positive game impact. I'd also take Duncan over Kobe, but I'm a little spoiled with Duncan so I didn't include him to make it as unbiased as possible. Still, I think putting Duncan on any good team makes them better, whereas Kobe wouldn't neccessarily make many teams better besides a select few with already terrible offense like the 76ers.
I know that. No trade clause doesn't mean he won't agree to waive the clause for certain trades. Happens in baseball all the time (the sport with the most no trade clauses in it).
So that isn't really a reason not to trade Kobe, it's just a reason why a trade involving Kobe might potentially not fall through.
Lakers need to ditch Bynum. He's their only valuable trading piece, they won't get equal value for Pau, and they could still rebuild a fantastic team around trading Bynum, who doesn't give a who he plays for or where he plays. Dude wants money more than a le. Not the kind of franchise player you want to construct the next dynasty around.
My guess its he's talking current players.
Kobe its nowhere near top 5 overall material.
He's not top 5 currently either.
Kobe is still better than Wade
From a business standpoint, he's irreplaceable
Fans forget that making a profit is more important to most owners than winning a chip.
Kobe can do whatever he wants. He's the most polarizing player to ever play the game. Just saying his name can cause one to give a heart-tugging soliloquy in his honor...and incite uncontrollable rage from his detractors.
The NBA will suffer greatly without his global fan support.
This.
Buss even stated that Kobe is worth 70 million a year for the revenue he brings in alone.
He'll never be traded, even if he declines to an 18 per game scorer on 30% shooting. His brand is too valuable to the Lakers franchise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
