outta here.
Then why did he attack Zimmerman and get shot?
outta here.
No, but the definition that you provided requires one to move stealthily. He did not move stealthily, as supported by the fact that Martin's girlfriend is on the record saying that Marin saw someone (Zimmerman) following him. Hence, he failed to stalk under your definition. Followed yes, but stalk no.
He was wrongly profiled and stalked by a person with a record of violence.
and the article brings up a excellent point. white people get the benefit of the doubt in society. it is what it is. white kid in hoodie= non violent, skater/emo kid or kid trying to stay warm. black kid in hoodie= casing homes, looks su ious, killer, crackhead, etc.
zimmerman's inner racist trigger went into overdrive when he say trayvon with a fist full of skittles and tea. because all criminals need candy and tea to committ crimes
hey el, what happened to wc?
As I said, he sucked at stalking. That doesn't mean he didn't stalk him.
I'm sure I can find another definition without the word stealthy in it. Would that change everything for you?
the word you're looking for here is prejudice
He followed an innocent kid he had wrongly profiled around a neighborhood while carrying a gun.
Yeah, that makes it sound so much better. Score one for team Zimmerman.
oh thanks, he's prejudice and racist.
I didn't read the icle. But I suspect that the % of black people wearing hoodies that commit crimes is higher than the % of white people wearing hoodies that commit violent crimes.
Is this really the best you can do with an argument about his credibility.
http://newsone.com/2004745/zimmerman-bail-money/
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/cr...printArticle=y
The Prosecutor is so sure that she can bring a charge of perjury that she did not even bother to ask bail to be revoked but rather, just asked that it be increased.
Lol at Clambake
why would you think that?
Not really, because he did not stalk him. Truth be told, I only care about the legal definition of stalking. That is what would matter in this case.
oh, well, then it's ok, i guess.
sorry mrs. martin. you lost by %.
still dodging that he lied from zimmermans tank. lol
tell us el. what did he lie about?
And now you have proof of his profiling. Man you just keep scoring points. Even the damn detective that supported the 2nd degree murder with his affidavit acknowledged that there was no direct evidence of profiling.
Then how did he decide to follow him?
Can you show he knew he had that much available?
I'm not sure that he lied about anything. Did the prosecutor ask him about the $150,000? Did he deny having it?
Zimmerman claiming to be broke and he and his wife claiming to be unemployed could very well be accurate.
The legal expenses in this case will probably run around $500,000.
Tell me Bake, Why is the prosecutor not bringing a perjury charge against Zimmerman? She can you know. But all she wants to do is increase bail. Why do you think that is?
i can show he lied about having it, period.
he said he didn't know he could use it, right?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)