That will be for Zimmerman to tell, if he decides to take the stand. On what evidence do you base your claim of profiling?
The fact that he followed Martin in the first place.
Why else would he follow him?
yes, he told the court he had no money.
duh. he finally got a taste of money.Zimmerman claiming to be broke and he and his wife claiming to be unemployed could very well be accurate.
so what?The legal expenses in this case will probably run around $500,000.
i haven't once mentioned the prosecution. i'm trying to discuss george's credibility. that thing you ignore.Tell me Bake, Why is the prosecutor not bringing a perjury charge against Zimmerman? She can you know. But all she wants to do is increase bail. Why do you think that is?
But can you show that he knew he had it. He might not of known the fund status. In fact, this is where someone might intentionally not want to know, or where someone else might intentionally keep them in the dark. Plausible deniability is a good legal strategy.
Two very different things. If you want to call it perjury, I want to see your evidence he factually knew the numbers.
you are so ing stupid.
he finally told his own lawyer that he had it........and that he'd already spent 54K........in 2 months.
I could take 1,000 guesses and they would only be guesses.
1000 guesses huh?
#492: he thought martin was a space invader?
Why guess? He called the police.
He wanted a Skittle.
If I were Zimmerman's defense attorny. I would hope and pray that their case against my client's credibility is based on whether or not he lied about the $150,000.00.
You see, usually past instances of misbahavior are not admissible, except when it comes to crimes that question a person's integrety (i.e. fraud,). So it would be in the prosecutions best interest to bring a charge of perjury against Zimmerman as it would directly attack his credibility. The prosecutor seems to be intentionally not bringing this charge because there is nothing to it and she knows it.
Lets jump back and consider your allegation of lying compared to the witnesses, which started this thread. In Zimmerman's case, he disclosed the money within 24 hours of the hearing right? Well before he used $5,000 of the money to post bail.
Now compare this to witnesses changing their story after admitting that their opinions have changed after watching TV. Or admitting that their stories have changed 30 days later.
My experience would tell me to bet on Zimmerman's credibility here.
george wouldn't have done this in the old days.
he would have used his rhodesian ridgeback.
So everytime someone calls the police they profile?
ummmmmm, he spent 54K in 2 months.
rofl the Zimmerman crowd trying to claim that there's a HUGE difference between "follow" and "stalk" in this situation.
Why did he call the police?
Stealthy is the difference.
As if that meant categorically impossible to detect.
rofl so basically they're saying if George Zimmerman wasn't a porker and didn't pant when he had to get out of his car and walk he would have been stalking and that would change everything but instead it was just following.
He's lucky he's fat and probably drags his feet when he walks tbh.
Zimmerman also had a broken nose. And the doctor that treated him for it is going to testify. Self defense, stand your ground acquittal. Book it Danno.
by the way, the judge wants to hear more about the money before listening to the argument.
care to take a 1000 guesses on what he spent the 54K on?
oh, and it was 204K before he pissed away 54K.
you know, of the money he said he didn't have?
links to the money spent?
you didn't have a big sword purchase?
Ah, I'd have to find that again. It was characterized as living expenses.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
