Depends, who else is on my team?
Harden
Westbrook
Harden regardless who else is on the team.
Harden, easily. I said it when OKC re-signed Westbrick...he will be the reason they will never win it all.
What would you rather eat, cat poop or steak?
Harden, Westbrook just chucks shots up and isn't mentally tough
This plus Harden was underwhelming against the Lakers and Russ was a boss.
Tonight Harden looked Like Manu and Russ like a AND1 player ...
To me I feel that the choice is a lot tougher. Needless to say both players are really good but this isn't in a vac so what team do they get added to? If I just add either to the bobs I would choose Westbrook, harden is way more efficent but on the cats team he would not be the same player since he would have to create everything for everyone and would
get doubled way more often, he just wouldn't be the same. Westbrook would also be worse but would be way better because Westbrook already creates everything he would just have to do it more?
On a team like the knicks? Harden like I said he is crazy efficent and he would totally obliderate dishing to melo and mare actually keeping
the game under control or exploding on his own, but westbrook would create even a worse black hole on that team.
Westbrook is the better first but worst support Harden is the better support but worst first.
harden
Russ doesn't seem very coachable though... since he's a child and all. Similar to Bynum. Harden has more class so it makes more sense
I just voted Harden but after thinking about it... Westbrook has a higher ceiling for a couple of reasons..
Harden CAN'T DO if he's forced to his right, Westbrook can attack either way, I can't say who has an advantage shooting but I think Westbrook is a better player.
I think Westbrook is just going through his "young Tony Parker" phase. Once he figures it out, I think his ceiling is even higher than Harden's.
Westbrook, mainly b/c i don't know how Harden would do if he was THE man on a team, and defenses had to account for him while now teams are more focused on Westbrook/Durant right now.
And Westbrook's ceiling is extremely high, he's a bit too erratic, but needs better coaching. A bit higher then Harden's ceiling is imo.
Frustrating at times, but he's only 23.
I'd take Harden. I don't buy Westbrook as a point guard, but as a two guard I would rank him in the top 5 in the league. That being said, athletic two guards are not hard to come buy. I like Harden's game more overall, and I think he has that special "it" factor. As many others have said, his game is reminiscent of a less flashy Manu Ginobili.
Harden, because he knows how to score points without taking a lot of shots away from Durant.
Harden unless my team offense totally blows. Then maybe Westbrook to try and carry the load.
Harden would fit in well with just about any team imo. Westbrook definitely doesn't fit in with a lot of squads out there.
OKC are pretty stacked @ backcourt & wing but they're still more of a jump-shooting team rather then anything else, and teams playing such a style never win championships. they only use 3 bigs rotation and none of them poses any offensive threat at the low post
Parker was never dumb. He never took away shots from TD and DRob.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)