Will the Spurs' exceed the Rockets' 22 game winning streak?

[Ari Gold]

[phyzik]

Spurs will probably lose tomorrow.

[cheguevara]

no

they losing game 3 for sure

[thOOdee]

no and don't care

[sananspursfan21]

Going with shaq and saying THUNDER probably wont win game 3

[ducks]

spurs streak is more impressive even if it ends before 22
spurs killed good teams in regular season they beat the lakers 2 times and destroyed them both times

sweeping in the playoffs is very hard
beating the thunder 2 times also is not easy

[coyotes_geek]

Doubtful. Spurs probably drop one in OKC.

[Arcadian]

I'm gonna have to say no...and that's not a criticism. Winning both games in OKC is just an extremely unlikely task. This team is capable of it, but the odds are against it.

[SA210]

Yes

[Juanobili]

i'm gonna have to say no...and that's not a criticism. Winning both games in okc is just an extremely unlikely task. This team is capable of it, but the odds are against it.

+1

[Beaverfuzz]

I just don't think the Spurs will sweep the SuperSonics. So no.

[capek]

I have a feeling they will. The commentating on the results of game 1 and 2 was so weird. In game 1, the Thunder go small in the 4th, they lose, and everybody is like, "Why'd the Thunder go small? They were successful with Ibaka out there, Thunder shoulda gone back to their big lineup." In game 2, Thunder stay big and keep Perkins out there a lot, and everyone is like, "Thunder should have gone small earlier. Perkins sucks. Thunder should go small all game. Why didn't Thabo play more??" Well dip , Thabo played 31 minutes in game 1. The Thunder played the small line which included Thabo plenty in game 1. And the still lost! So, now, by playing this a bit in game 2, the Thunder have all the sudden discovered a formula to beat the Spurs? Talk about having zero ing short term memory. Chuck was especially bad about this last night in the wrap up. Just stupid commentators searching for something to say tbh

That's why I think the Spurs have a good chance to sweep. Thunder could certainly get a game in OKC, I just don't think they will.

[Basketball Power]

Spurs will win tomorrow and then gm4 is just a formality

[Legacy]

EDITED:


Sure. Why not.


This team has been continuously impressing me (to say the least) left and right, right and left.


Anything is possible.

[Obstructed_View]

What's the ing obsession with making predictions? I can understand re s like ESPN doing it, but why do the rest of us insist on following along?

[Legacy]

What's the ing obsession with making predictions? I can understand re s like ESPN doing it, but why do the rest of us insist on following along?

Because, OV... we get paid the big bucks on here to do so. LOL

[DMC]

Other than just for the sake of the implications (being in the Finals) I coiuldn't care less.

[DMC]

What's the ing obsession with making predictions? I can understand re s like ESPN doing it, but why do the rest of us insist on following along?

That Carmelo/RJ thing go south on you? And how's the Blair thing going?

[Spur|n|Austin]

Nice try, Ari.

[Budkin]

OKC is going to win at least one game and it will be tomorrow. Like Clips game 3 but we don't come back. Then Pop adjusts and we win game 4.

[SpursRock20]

You want to know what's really impressive about this streak? Over 70% of their wins have come against winning teams.

[Spurtacus]

Nope. Don't care about win streak.

1 game at a time. 6 to go.

[Jimcs50]

I think it will reach 26 straight

[Obstructed_View]

That Carmelo/RJ thing go south on you? And how's the Blair thing going?

Not a clue.

[PÒÓCH]

What's the ing obsession with making predictions? I can understand re s like ESPN doing it, but why do the rest of us insist on following along?

Because it's fun and it gives people something to talk about, next question?