Reply With Quote
dumperster is a "cuck in training", he's got a lot to learn yet to reach Blake's levels.
Never knew there were "levels" of Cucking....that's pretty sad.
Actually I'd give him a higher grade for knowing his team. This was a setup for a loss if the players didn't come out and match intensity. They didn't, Pop knew it and called the game as he's done many times before with good results the following game. A lesser coach would have wasted the starters energy on a lost cause. I don't see how anyone familiar with the Spurs can not see what he was doing. You really think Pop thought Anderson was going to spark some kind of comeback?
dumperster is a "cuck in training", he's got a lot to learn yet to reach Blake's levels.
Never knew there were "levels" of Cucking....that's pretty sad.
Well, I'd have to defend mmdumpster here. He would actually join in after the second round of his girl getting rammed.
He wouldn't just watch.
You guys are really, really interested in the sex lives of men here.
Notice how he didn't actually deny anything?
I knew you weren't on Blake's level yet. You are welcome mdumpster.
So glad we are friends.
Notice how you didn't deny you are totally into the sex lives of men here.
lol still not denying
Right, you aren't denying it at all.
lol TWO popsucking cucks!
Who knew?
Why would any man choose to satisfy your sexual needs on this message board?
Excellent question-tell us why mdumpster?
It's kind of cute the way Blake has taken his new cuck in training under his wing like a proud parent bird regurgitating it's last meal back into it's chick's mouth.. except in this case it's something a little saltier.
Well, they aren't called POPPERS for nothing, are they?
You're strange
do you believe you are truly enlightened?
"Nobody gives a take this somewhere else god damn."
-Non-InternetWarriorz
The next Popper meeting will feature special cupcakes from dumpsterr, of course with the "secret ingredient" that's sure to be a hit!Well, they aren't called POPPERS for nothing, are they?
Where's the Bonner that destroyed the Thunder last season?
Pretty sure we had a 2 game losing streak the last time he did that because we lost the following game.
A great coach would have also tanked vs the Clips then? You don't tank playoff games.A lesser coach would have wasted the starters energy on a lost cause. I don't see how anyone familiar with the Spurs can not see what he was doing. You really think Pop thought Anderson was going to spark some kind of comeback?
Let's be honest the big boys line is the cheesiest I've heard in a while, they would even put it in straight to dvd movies, that's how bad it was. The nasty thing wasn't that much better, felt like he rehearsed it in his head for a while, sounded like a pretty lame way to say put your head outta your ass and play harder.
I feel like Pop is easily the most overated piece of this team. He has an awesome awesome staff working for him behind the scenes, the most coach-ables stars in the league, some of the best role players and he still manages to mess it up from time to time. Like someone said, he didn't really give the team any chance with his wacky rotation. Also feels like he has no vision, the three points lineup with TP, Manu and Diaw doesn't need to be coached tbh, they gave us some passing porn in game 2 because they were just made to play together, they're just awesome like that. Meanwhile Pop can't get enough of four down... He's no Guardiola that's for sure, he's more of an underachieving Mourinho.
Also Tim is as bad in this series as he was brilliant in the Clips series. He's hurting consistenly instead of helping and he's one of the main reason anyone picked us over the Thunder, so much for the inside scoring threat...
yummmmy!!!!!The next Popper meeting will feature special cupcakes from dumpsterr, of course with the "secret ingredient" that's sure to be a hit!
Who gives a ?
What does it matter?
That was the question for you.
I certainly chose not to. I don't know why you keep asking me about my sex life.
A couple of numbers jumped out that made me believe the loss had way more to do with the Spurs effort than it did with anything OKC did.
Team FG%: 39.5%
Turnovers: 21
Tim Duncan Rebounding Total: 2
OKC Assists vs SAS Assists: 23-18
The Spurs missed a lot of early wide open shots. They also had a lot of turnovers that were the result of lazy passing. Both of these led to fast break points for the Thunder and got them rolling. Tony Parker is known to have lapses like this, and his play last night reminded me of the first Laker game this year where he disappeared under the tiniest pressure and everyone was questioning his heart. Hopefully he responds similarly to how he did against the Lakers.
Duncan's numbers are a little more concerning. He has played rather poorly this series. Perkins is one of the best post defenders in the league, and that is clearly showing now. The Spurs can survive if Duncan doesn't score a lot of points, but they need him to get rebounds. Fortunately, his defense has remained top notch.
The assist total was a big letdown after the Greatest Show on Hardwood that was games 1 and 2. The Spurs did not respond well to the change in strategy OKC employed on their pick and roll defense. This is a veteran team that should have had at least some form of an answer. OKC did not reinvent the wheel with their defense in game 3, the Spurs just did not adjust to it.
The team was due for a loss after 20 straight wins. Winning that much is bound to leave one lackadaisical at some point. They survived a similar event against the Clippers in round 2, but OKC was just to good to overcome. Effort is what the team needs to improve upon more than anything for game 4.
just curious as to how someone so enlightened could be so easily butthurt.
I didn't really think you were enlightened. Thanks for confirming you're just a silly idiot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
