Reply With Quote
George Hill
Not just this year but for the past ~decade.
George Hill
They've all been good and bad at different times. Such is the nature of compe ive sports. I think on balance over the past decade all 3 have been excellent. You can't win every game, no matter how good you are.
PS I know you're probably looking to bag TP, but he has carried the team for long stretches over the years and was superb in the 2007 Finals (good enough for Finals MVP).
yeh exploiting a scrub rookie boobie gibson was a hard job
Manu...2006 Dirk foul
Parker without a doubt.
People forget we wouldn't have been in that position without Manu.
its not like Tony doesn't have the balls or anything...it's just that he thinks:
big-game-player=forgetting your teammates and forcing it!
Manu still plays smart ball and Timmy is an inside player which can force it more often than your freaking pointguard (it just sucks the enery out of you, when only one player is toughing the ball).
Yep, he hit a three just before that. He also should have had shot blockers behind him for that game and the five games before it. Actually with shot blockers behind him, that would have been game one or two of the west finals.
New nickname for Tony Parker if the Spurs lose in six: Malaise.
Every single word here is truth
over the course of the season? manu.
in this series, which is the one that counts, its tony. discussion over
lets start the "trade Parker for scrub XY" threads!
Stern vetoes and gives us Luke Ridnour instead.
Ime Udoka
Tony.
Huge disappointment in mathcup vs. Thunder since they put Thabo on him. Egoistic plays, like he has no team behind him.
Which makes his error even worse, because the team was relying on him to make the smart play at that moment.
But he wanted to be the hero by attempting to block a shot by a driving 7-fter when the game was in the bag, and it cost the Spurs a le.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
