Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 99
  1. #51
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Beanz...REALLY? Tell me you're kidding. After Davis, there's a HUGE dropoff in this draft. You do NOT give up the best player on a team 2 games from the Finals for a draft pick in a ty draft.
    This is not a ty draft by any stretch of the imagination; it's probably the best one we'll see for years. Not that I would trade Parker for the #2 though, because

    (1) The Spurs have proved they're able to contend if they can stay healthy, so might as well keep the core together and see if they can add an extra piece somewhere else or if Kawhi can follow his impressive rookie season with a breakout sop re campaign.

    (2) Kidd-Gilchrist is the best prospect after Davis, but getting him would mean trading Kawhi. Barnes is the next guy I'd want, and he's also a SF.
    Last edited by baseline bum; 06-09-2012 at 01:25 AM.

  2. #52
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377

  3. #53
    Veteran Richie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    2,989
    Maybe if we do trade Jack, he could get bought out and come back.
    If he leaves in a trade, I bet he comes back as a free agent for another run if Duncan and Manu are still here in the 13/14 season

  4. #54
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Not likely. A few rumors are saying Spurs are looking at NO 10th pick in a deal that would send Blair, Mills and Jackson to No for the 10th pick and Oak. I like the trade if we are gonna make a run again. Had giving up Jack and I like Mills.

    We then would use the 10th pick on Drummond or Henson.

    Also Spurs are know to have intrest in the back up PF from Chi who would be a great addition. Guy is athletic, has a jumper, good shot blocker. I would much rather grab him and spend the 10th pick on Dion Waiters, Henson or a slasher who can get to the rim and finish.
    Doubtful that Drummond would be there at 10, and Henson is way too skinny to contribute right away. Henson is a project with a really high upside though, and wouldn't be a bad pick there for a team that's rebuilding. At #10 I'd go for either Perry Jones for his size, athleticism, and ceiling, Kendall Marshall to have a solid distributor off the bench, or Austin Rivers to have instant offense off the bench (even as a rookie I think he'd be a big upgrade over Neal).

  5. #55
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    The Spurs won't deal TP until TD retires, if ever anyways.

    I expect that TD, Pop, and Manu will go out together and the rebuild will be on.
    I really hope Pop sticks around for at least another 5 years or so with his track record of player development. That'll be a sad day to jump on that coaching carousel again that we saw in the 90s.

  6. #56
    Veteran Richie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    2,989
    Doubtful that Drummond would be there at 10, and Henson is way too skinny to contribute right away. Henson is a project with a really high upside though, and wouldn't be a bad pick there for a team that's rebuilding. At #10 I'd go for either Perry Jones for his size, athleticism, and ceiling, Kendall Marshall to have a solid distributor off the bench, or Austin Rivers to have instant offense off the bench (even as a rookie I think he'd be a big upgrade over Neal).
    Thing is, none of those really fills the need we have for a big time defensive player next to Duncan.

    If we got the #10, I think we would actually trade back down and pick up a big 7 footer like Meyers Leonard or Tyler Zeller and get an extra piece in the trade as a backup, like Mbah a Moute if we lost SJax

  7. #57
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    5,000
    If he leaves in a trade, I bet he comes back as a free agent for another run if Duncan and Manu are still here in the 13/14 season
    That's just what I was thinking.

  8. #58
    Believe. Roger Freemason Jr.'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    1,635
    Don't forget about DeColo coming over next season.
    Bruno said so.

  9. #59
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Honestly though, I don't want to lose Jack even for #10 + Okafor. You just don't trade away a guy who has been a bigtime playoff performer for his entire career. Especially when he can swing between guarding the 3 and the 4.

  10. #60
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    spurs get 10th pick, the trade that and get DMC

  11. #61
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    12,058
    I'm still not sure they do it, but if we trade Neal, Mills, Blair and Jax for Oka + 10 we end up with

    Parker / ?
    Green / Ginobili
    Kawhi / ?
    Duncan / Diaw? / Bonner
    Okafor / Splitter

    Not sure if I like it tbh, giving up Jax leaves us with no backup small forward and a lot of pressure on Kawhi, and if we are getting Okafor back then we probably wouldn't draft a young big with the 10, and it seems silly to take a SF when we already have Kawhi or a PG when Tony is our franchise player.

    Maybe we take Henson with the #10 and don't resign Diaw and end up with an absolutle monster of a front line, and then try and sign someone like Andre Miller with the MLE as backup point. Still don't know where that leaves us at small forward though

    The more I think about it, the less I like us trading away Jackson.

    You give up jackson in a minute if you can make a major overhaul upgrade on the frontline. Amazing people are hesistant to make the deal.

  12. #62
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    12,058
    Honestly though, I don't want to lose Jack even for #10 + Okafor. You just don't trade away a guy who has been a bigtime playoff performer for his entire career. Especially when he can swing between guarding the 3 and the 4.
    Jackson is soon to be over the hill. You make the deal in a second to upgrade the frontline.

  13. #63
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Jackson is soon to be over the hill. You make the deal in a second to upgrade the frontline.
    Okafor looks over the hill already though.

  14. #64
    YOU JUST GOT THE BUISNESS SamoanTD's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    796
    If bobcats are shopping there pick it ain't going to be to the spurs tbh.

  15. #65
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    Point Guards don't win your team championships. Point Guards can be replaced. Talent like Drummond or Kidd-Gilchrist can take your team places.
    a big who scouts openly question whether he even likes basketball & a wing who can't shoot?

    yep, that's what i want to build the team around.

    (both may well turn into nice players, but i feel fairly confident that neither are the #1 or #2 options on future championship teams)

  16. #66
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    Okafor is a candy ass. No thanks, especially for Buckets.

    This front office screwed royally by thinking it could go on the cheap and replacing Jackson with 'anyone' after 2003. We remedied one colossal front office screwup this spring, let's not repeat history.

  17. #67
    Veteran tesseractive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    2,236
    Okafor is a candy ass. No thanks, especially for Buckets.

    This front office screwed royally by thinking it could go on the cheap and replacing Jackson with 'anyone' after 2003. We remedied one colossal front office screwup this spring, let's not repeat history.
    Okafor looks exposed trying to be "the guy" in the paint. But he might look a lot better playing next to Tim. He's certainly not likely to be a franchise savior, but he might be a better option than any of the alternatives we currently have on the roster.

    I don't watch enough college ball to have a strong opinion on any of the guys that might be available with #10. If there's a guy we think we can be an All-Star, then it would be worth trading Jack. I love having him back, but Kawhi's going to keep improving and his minutes will rise next year, which makes it easier to get by without him.

    The reality is, we pretty well showed that we're not winning the le with the current lineup. So if we want to have a shot, we have to try to improve. If the opportunity presents itself, that means taking the risk of trading known quan ies for unknown. So if we think we can get better value by trading Jack, or even Tony, I'm in favor of it -- despite the fact that I like both players.

  18. #68
    Believe. Beanzamillion21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Post Count
    641
    This is not a ty draft by any stretch of the imagination; it's probably the best one we'll see for years. Not that I would trade Parker for the #2 though, because

    (1) The Spurs have proved they're able to contend if they can stay healthy, so might as well keep the core together and see if they can add an extra piece somewhere else or if Kawhi can follow his impressive rookie season with a breakout sop re campaign.

    (2) Kidd-Gilchrist is the best prospect after Davis, but getting him would mean trading Kawhi. Barnes is the next guy I'd want, and he's also a SF.
    Agreed, this is a great draft for the Spurs. As someone stated earlier, the FO could trade for a top 10 turn it into 2 solid players in a sign and trade or one top ten player.

  19. #69
    Believe. Beanzamillion21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Post Count
    641
    I really hope Pop sticks around for at least another 5 years or so with his track record of player development. That'll be a sad day to jump on that coaching carousel again that we saw in the 90s.
    Or go to the FO and bring up Coach Bud.

  20. #70
    Enemy of the FCC and AMA Dr. John R. Brinkley's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    551
    Okafor is a candy ass. No thanks, especially for Buckets.

    This front office screwed royally by thinking it could go on the cheap and replacing Jackson with 'anyone' after 2003. We remedied one colossal front office screwup this spring, let's not repeat history.
    Yes, thank you. I'm thrilled that Jack is finally back. The team is already paper soft/paper thin. I don't see how they could trade a proven big game player for unknown scraps. The team has signed way too many fragile players over the years. The team is way better off with Jack in the locker room. I want him to retire a Spur if possible. He should never have left.

  21. #71
    Three And Counting ...
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    677
    Bonner, Blair, Joseph and a 2nd rd pick for NO #10 and Okafor. Do not trade Neal or Mills. If push comes to shove, throw in the rights to someone we know we cant sign, example the player we got for Scola who retired and now wants to play again. He's from Greece.

  22. #72
    YOU JUST GOT THE BUISNESS SamoanTD's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    796
    Bonner, Blair, Joseph and a 2nd rd pick for NO #10 and Okafor. Do not trade Neal or Mills. If push comes to shove, throw in the rights to someone we know we cant sign, example the player we got for Scola who retired and now wants to play again. He's from Greece.
    Why would NO do that? That's beyond down grading.

  23. #73
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,914
    Why would NO do that? That's beyond down grading.
    I wouldn't do the deal, but NO would. They want space. 10th pick is a gamble to give up anyone significant. It's too high in the lottery. But it's high enough NO would rather gamble with the pick and the players upside rather than trade for a quality NBA player a step below an all star. The only trade that works is getting a bunch of expiring contracts to shed Okafor's salary. They will draft their big man of the future, resign Gordon, get in the high lottery next year, and sign a quality free agent next year with the savings from the expiring contract and they've got a Thunderesque team.

    I just think 10 pick and Okafor keep us in the good not great catagory. And I want all hands on deck for the tankathon we will do to get Jabari Parker in two years.

  24. #74
    Believe. Andthentherewas21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    544
    I just think 10 pick and Okafor keep us in the good not great catagory. And I want all hands on deck for the tankathon we will do to get Jabari Parker in two years.
    Okafor didn't keep the Hornets from being a lottery team this year.

    As for the tankathon, the Spurs won't need to do anything to get there. When Duncan and Manu retire, especially if its at the same time, your talking about removing 2 of the foundations of a system that has already been shown to be fading with its Superstar. At that point there is no telling what the organization decides to do with Parker, or what Parker tells them he wants. There is going to be an overhaul of the entire system unless you find another Robinson/Duncan like presence in the paint.

    Kawhi is a good player and could be a borderline all-star at that point, but take a look at teams with Andre Iguodala as their #1 option, and that is a best case scenario. Splitter is a great backup (most of the time), but is he the type of player your ride into the postseason? Green, Neal, bench seat warmed by Cory Joseph, ect, do any of those guys keep you out of the lottery without the big 3 there?

  25. #75
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    Okafor looks exposed trying to be "the guy" in the paint. But he might look a lot better playing next to Tim. He's certainly not likely to be a franchise savior, but he might be a better option than any of the alternatives we currently have on the roster.

    I don't watch enough college ball to have a strong opinion on any of the guys that might be available with #10. If there's a guy we think we can be an All-Star, then it would be worth trading Jack. I love having him back, but Kawhi's going to keep improving and his minutes will rise next year, which makes it easier to get by without him.

    The reality is, we pretty well showed that we're not winning the le with the current lineup. So if we want to have a shot, we have to try to improve. If the opportunity presents itself, that means taking the risk of trading known quan ies for unknown. So if we think we can get better value by trading Jack, or even Tony, I'm in favor of it -- despite the fact that I like both players.
    There's no one in this draft who is going to come out and drop 6-7 threes in a big game in the playoffs like Buckets just did... at least not at any point during the remainder of the Tim Duncan era.

    So, yeah, gonna have to disagree with you here.

    If you're shopping for a big, it's got to be someone who can go down and play on the low post and pass out of it to open shooters (so you can lift Tim out to the high post). That, or someone with a functional jumper but great help side defender (like an Ibaka). Okafor doesn't fill either of those roles.

    The front office game plan for this summer needs to be to keep Tony, Tim, Manu, Jackson, Leonard, and Diaw, and use any other player not in that list to get better. Oh, and whatever it takes to get that sorry POS Bonner off this team by August 31.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •