Reply With Quote
Underdogs often win it all (cf. 92 Denmark, 98 France, 02 Brazil, 04 Greece, 06 Italy)
But yeah, he's re ed
jumpin up and down doing all, justlike that other midget messi, walking.....walking....walking
Underdogs often win it all (cf. 92 Denmark, 98 France, 02 Brazil, 04 Greece, 06 Italy)
But yeah, he's re ed
The English lineup has been to begin with and that lineup has been ravaged by injuries. begets more .
This might be the year of the underdog. No one has really stood out but it's still only the first games. I could see someone like Italy taking it all though.
I didn't even name a stat
But yeah, he's re ed
nker
when did i say they were favs? they got all as a roster with all the injuries
show me what has he done in this game besides doing all, what matters is the goal...so what did he do?
I didn't even name a stat
I concur... On the paper, England has no chance to even reach the semis. But this is knock-out football here. As 92 Denmark or 04 Greece illustrates, paper does'nt mean much
'12 Chelsea
Everyone is pimping France. Can't really consider them underdogs.
Well I can't show you because I don't have the video, but rewatch the game and you'll see Iniesta was the best player.
"doing all"...
When Mexes and Rami are your central backs, you are underdogs
No, you're going to lose.
What about Russia, are they good or do the Czechs suck?
well, i'm used to it nowNo, you're going to lose.
Oh and since 2000, France has had 2 good games only in official International compe ions (Spain and Brazil in 2006)
A bit of both
Modric better get me some points.
Come on, Jelavic...
Why are these filler teams even in the compe ion?
Random whistles
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
