Reply With Quote
they wouldn't call.
do you pull the trigger?
they wouldn't call.
No.
no you Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Lu ck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_
to the no
yea I love Manu but he's up there in age and his game is declining.
bobcat wont do that. maybe parker + splitter
You sound so ing stupid with your fake wisdom; of course you'd pull the trigger but the call would never occur. Not even Jordan would want a washed up 2 guard & a soft as scrub named Tiago Splitter.
Nobody wants a 35 year old injury proned SG for a 2 pick...
Not even Jordan..
no. And it'll never happen. Jordan isn't THAT bad of a GM.
Someone explain why this code comes up, or for what forbidden phrase it replaces?
As for OP, I'd like to see Charlotte acquire Bryant from LA for the pick. Full circle and .
No because unlike most Spur fans, I don't have a gun to my head.
When Sean Elliott's name is misspelled.
There are a few things that will trigger it. Some word that rhymes with trigger will do it as well I think.
thats a clown question bro
Hey dumbass, you think Jordan is re ed enough to offer such a pathetic trade?
Let's see, we got Manu Ginobili. A great 2-guard on the clear downside of his career. Yeah, the upside for a lottery team, I know. Then, we got Tiago, a soft European post player that has his nuts shrivel up to the point of being neutralized by a 6'3 guard.
Gtfo here got. Take those homer glasses off and entertain the idea that this isn't 2005.
Obviously not if I said: "the call would never occur". But to say no if it did is ing stupid. lol @ your post btw all that rage, just to be in agreement with me.
Smh.
my goodness would you ever. take drummond, have ducan team him a thing, take robinson have him start
I would in a heart beat...if ducks was the owner, and gm of the bobcats.
Ducks proposing a trade. I wonder who it's gonna involve?
Good ing god I look like the even bigger dumbass for responding to such a stupid take. My mistake on not reading the tail end of your post, or whatever you want to call it.
All I have to say is:
Nah ? I would say yeah to such a trade but it's impossible that such a trade would be out in the table. Hence, my response, and your misunderstanding. It's okay, greys get used to such a response.
Btw, it's 'disagreement' and not agreement.
Well you quoted my post & copied everything in my post, so it is agreement.
And don't use the color of my name to justify your stupidity.
Like I said, I didn't mean to respond to you with my statement as I didn't read your full post. Are you going to be so stupid as to ignore that?
On the majority, the color of a name on this site speaks to the volumes of the stupidity of a poster. Just thought I'd let you know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
