He looked like the X factor all season and then shriveled to Bonneresque levels when the pressure came. Sad story, but he did have a good first 2 (pressureless) rounds, so hopefully he does better next season.
why?
simple he is garbage and cant handle pressure..
i bet the cavs are laughing at us right now...
he has an ugly shot takes wild shots, and i think his jermey lynn fame is done.. trade him trade him trade him!!!
He looked like the X factor all season and then shriveled to Bonneresque levels when the pressure came. Sad story, but he did have a good first 2 (pressureless) rounds, so hopefully he does better next season.
He handled pressure just fine at UNC.
And if the problem is his shot mechanics, all the more reason to keep him around for longer so Chip can keep working with him to sort them out.
He handled pressure just fine at UNC.
And if the problem is his shot mechanics, all the more reason to keep him around for longer so Chip can keep working with him to sort them out.
Why would the Cavs be laughing at us
Danny can stay in my book, and should only leave if we get some value for him. I'd argue he's an upgrade to George Hill too. The Bonner comparison is garbage just based on how long Bonner has been a non-factor in the playoffs.
Danny should stay. He broke into the starting lineup for a reason. Sure he wilted in the playoffs, but he's damn near a rookie. Give him some time. He's got defensive and offensive skills, and doesn't cost a ton of money and doesn't seem to be full of himself too much.
I like him.
I'd like to keep him. Had Bruce Bowen not had a huge series against the Lakers in '03 people would have been calling for Stephen Jackson's head the same way they do Green. Jack averaged 8.3 PPG on 33% shooting (19% from the three) in what was by far the most important series of that playoffs, and people would have called him a huge choker had they blown it. Moral of the story: don't write a good player off based on one really bad series (unless it's Turkoglu who had no one within 15 feet of him on virtually every shot)
Danny is a good role player. Nothing else. I'd like to keep him because our other options are limited.
I don't think he needs to go but i don't want to see SA overpaying to keep him.
Yo, chill.
He's a good player but yes, he will be playing in another jersey next season.
Why do you say that?
Someone will overpay him.
Tbh I'm okay that his cold spell coincided with the Thunder series- his market value plummeted, allowing the Spurs to sign him for cheap.![]()
Am I the only one that noticed this? Jeremy Lin fame?![]()
Hes good enough, and would be worth the qualifying offer. Not much more than that though unless he can develop a shot off the dribble.
Green's defense is probably why we even had a chance this season. He's one of our top perimeter defenders.
![]()
Agree. Danny Green is still a developing player, who deserves a longer look. Based upon what we've already seen, there is certainly enough there to justify bringing him back. One bad series does not mean the Spurs should kick him to the curb.
I'm all for signing and trading Green. He's another choker and I want to rid the team of those guys this off-season.
Its all about $$$ - if the price is right - I am not sure of his ceiling - personally I think he falls in the category of an excellent 5th wing outside the two deep at SG or SF - and an average primary backup
Dear God, please STFU already.![]()
lol giving up on a young stud, while the other stud on 3m a year didnt even bother showing up in the playoffs
So you are saying he will be in a New Jersey next season?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)