Reply With Quote
^lol no, it's just apparent. seriously trace along your circ star then lightly touch another part it feels different imho
Dude you seriously sit around experimenting by tickling various parts of your junk with feathers?
You take detailed notes too on a blog, or whottt?
^
ok we all now that u know alot about anteater kacks....horray u
^the at udes in america are funny. it's called being a fully intact male. the way you were made to be, with all of your man parts intact. surgically altered is the exception not the norm.
Yes. Since they embryonically originate from the same tissue, they essentially serve the same physiological functions as you stated in your initial post, among other things.
You suck at googling. I wanted to link a peer reviewed research publication or the Human Physiology book I used this past quarter but unfortunately I couldn't get to either one due to no access. Some simple googling and wallah:For the sake of my own information, however, I went ahead and did some googling to get the skinny on your 20,000 nerve endings. Pretty amusing results, really. All that comes up are a number of anti-cir cision websites and articles claiming the foreskin is home to a huge nerve cluster, but providing not a single source for this information, as well as several people on message boards asking for the origin of this particular statistic. Near as I can tell, it's been made up out of thin air by the people whose shtick you've adopted.
http://www.opposingviews.com/argumen...ial-functions#The foreskin contains 20,000–70,000 erogenous nerve endings, the majority of which are concentrated in the ridged band, which encircles the inner opening of the foreskin. When the penis is flaccid, the nerve endings are protected but, when erect, they are exposed. Cir cision removes about three-fourths of the nerve endings in the penis, leaving the cir cised penis severely disabled by comparison.
I found that link while googling. I found several others that say the same thing. What I didn't find is a single source or study that backs up the claim. As I stated in the comment you quoted. The impression is that someone invented the statistic out of thin air and a bunch of other people have been parroting the same information.
Shame you can't link to your peer reviewed publication, because I would actually be quite curious to read it.
Would just as soon forget about it before I'd use a condom.
Triggered, the information is there but it's quite difficult to find and suppressed. Disappointing that you weren't able to link it, it
Would be great for the doubters to see. I speak from personal experience that the foreskin is the most sensitive part even If all I have are the tiny remnants around the scar.
I just want to see a world where people have access to the information before subjecting their children to this and subsequently their future partners as well. Check out some of the interesting takes on what some people feel are the consequences it has on sex and marriages. While I think some of it may be over exaggerated, there is definitely some truth there.
some interesting pschological studies on the effects of infant cir cision:
http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi...Dgreg_boyle%22
Results
The combined sample (n=77) reported that their cir cised sexual partners
were unhappy with their cir cision status significantly more often than
were their genitally intact sexual partners (p < .05). Also, their cir cised
partners experienced significant progressive decline in glans sensitivity
(p<.001), and had to use significantly different techniques when
masturbating (p<.001). Cir cised partners more often resorted to unsafe
sex practices; they were significantly more likely to engage in anal
intercourse (p<.05), and significantly more reluctant to use condoms due to
reduced sexual sensation (p<.05). Respondents reported significantly higher
mean discontent among their cir cised partners than among their genitally
intact partners (p<.05).
As compared with genitally intact men, cir cised men reported
significantly greater dissatisfaction with their orgasms (p<.05), and a wide Physical, Sexual and Psychological Effects of Male Infant
Cir cision: an Exploratory Survey
3
range of negative emotions associated with being cir cised (p<.05).
Previous research indicates women enjoy intercourse better with genitally
intact men.
(10,11)
In view of the present findings based on self-selected
participants, the possible negative effects of cir cision on adults’ sexual
function and psychological well-being need to be discussed in providing
informed consent for cir cision (sexual reduction surgery) of unconsenting male minors.
Here's another scholarly journal on the effects of male cir cision on female sexual satisfaction. It harms you guys too.
http://xtulepinoy.tripod.com/sexualenjoyment.htm
http://www.cirp.org/library/general/hughes/
A study by Gemmel and Boyle
http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi...ext=greg_boyle
Conclusions
• Neonatal cir cision is an unnecessary and destructive surgical procedure which
has long term adverse effects, including reduction in sexual sensation and a
negative impact on psychological/emotional well-being.
• Education/awareness campaigns for prospective parents and those already with
children, would be extremely beneficial towards;
(i) Dispelling myths – e.g., demystifying the role and functions of the
foreskin.
(ii) Addressing hygiene concerns – e.g., how to care for the naturally intact
penis.
(iii) Dispelling Cultural Myths – e.g., promoting the “normality” of the intact
penis, and addressing the common, but superficial myth that a boy must
look just like his father. 10
• Further research is needed to establish whether there is a relationship between
partial penile amputation (euphemistically termed cir cision) and subsequent
prostate disorders.
This one is in fact probably the best of all, written by psychiatrist and psychotherapist John Rhinehart on the psychological effects of cir cision. If you don't read any of the others, you should read this one. It is fascinating, especially some of these 50 and 60 year old mens accounts and how the trauma was still there suppressed in their memories throughout their entire lives. Reading some of his accounts on particular patients of interest was fascinating, especially this one:
"BJ, 52 years old, came into therapy because he experienced "early issues coming up and polluting my life." During a particular session he kept using the term "cut off" in relation to family and other life issues. These issues had been triggered by his attending the bris (Jewish ritual cir cision) for a friend's newborn son. He heard the baby screaming and, much to his surprise, felt extremely uncomfortable, sweaty, dizzy, and aware that his genitals felt like they had suddenly been plunged into ice water and were "shrinking." Following this, he felt rage welling up at the idea that something was being taken from the baby--that he was being overpowered, reduced, and diminished against his will. BJ felt that this clearly related to his own neonatal cir cision. He was born three weeks before term weighing five pounds. He believes that he was not comforted or touched much after his premature birth or the cir cision which was performed on the third day in spite of his low birth weight. As we worked together, BJ made connections--cognitively, emotionally, and physically--between his early experience and his lifelong sense of anger, powerlessness, diminishment as a male, and underlying generalized ominous feeling that he was somehow going to be punished for being male. In photographs of himself as a young boy he noticed that he frequently had both hands covering his genitals. What also surfaced from a very young place was an incredulous "How can you do this to me--I can't trust you anymore," which reflected his feeling as an adult that people are untrustworthy. Connected with these was the belief that he was not supposed to cry or get mad as a result of what was done to him. Releasing and repatterning his feelings around his cir cision led to a significant increase in self-confidence, clarity in his relationships, and freedom to be the creative male person that he is without holding back because of fear of retaliation."
http://www.nocirc.org/articles/rhinehart1.php
I'd tell you to forget about it unless you used one.
By the way there are literally hundreds if not thousands of these, I'm not going to keep posting them endlessly but for anyone interested you can just find them on google by searching "psychological effects of cir cision"
^that makes it way less sensitive I know but I've never heard anything about psychological damage. Am I screwed?
when were you born? the doctor may have used anesthesia. when i was born it wasn't the norm..and everyone reacts differently i guess. i don't think you can really make blanket statements with something like this. i do know that hundreds of infants have died of shock over the pain though. perfectly healthy little baby boys died on the cir cision table for no reason.
Does anyone else find m>s avatar pic to be a little funny considering this topic?
His pic is a dude holding a phallus shaped object with two fingers in the snip snip position.
Jet smoking a victory cigar after winning the championship? You're reaching
I honestly dont care one way or the other. Was just ready through the thread and thought it was funny.
I haven't used a condom in decades and was tested last year and came up clean.
Well...mavs>spurs will be happy...
http://www.timesofisrael.com/german-...cir cisions/German judges rule parents can be brought to court for cir cising children
oh , already made a thread in the political forum before i saw this. good post, major victory for human rights.
If this carries over to the U.S., will you sue your parents for mental anguish?
btw...I seem to remember the last time that the Germans had a problem with Jews and their traditions. Didn't really turn out well for a lot of people.
no i'm currently in the process of suing the hospital and doctor who lied to my parents about the procedure. As far as my parents go, I have worked things out with them, they are regretful and admit they made a mistake out of ignorance.
PS check out foregen.org if you want to take control of your life and promote bodily integrity
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
