With hindsight being 20/20 - and both in their pre-prime years? I'd take Kobe believe it or not. The Killer Instinct LeBron is developing at age 27 was being displayed by Kobe at age 18. Remember the 3 airballs against Utah in the playoffs? Nobody - not Eddie Jones, not NVE, not Fisher - nobody was willing to take those shots. Kobe had the balls to take 'em. Sure, he missed them - but the fact that he was willing to take them speaks volumes of his character as a player. LeBron, from his rookie year until even now won't take those shots (more often than not). Kobe? He'll take them everytime - despite what a miss would do to his shooting percentages. Call me a homer all you want, but Kobe is still good, even going into his 17th year. He was truly amazing in his prime. He is still relevant. I got
proof too.
But if we were talking strictly on age right now, I'd be foolish to take a player in his 17th year over someone in their prime. That would be the only reason for me to choose LeBron over Kobe. LeBron has had a team built around him for several years and couldn't get it done. When Shaq/Kobe split, most of the championship vets left the Lakers as well. We were left with Smush, Mihm, Kwame, Vlade Rad, LO, Luke, and other scrubs. Once the Laker FO put a competent team around Kobe he repeated as a champion. LeBron has finally won, but it took 55-year old Battier playing out of his mind, Chalmers shooting lights out, and a top 5 SG and PF to get it done. Kobe won back-to-back with less overall talent.
