Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 39
  1. #1
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Danny Green's qualifying offer was for $2,695,391 so it wasn't exactly a sure thing that the Spurs would extend the offer. That amount is guaranteed; if the Spurs didn't like him or were going to get creative with their cap space, they may have avoided giving him the QO and took their chances.

    By giving Green the qualifying offer, he's now a restricted free agent. The Spurs could give him a multi-year deal or both sides could agree just to play out the season at that price. If he plays for the QO, Green would be an unrestricted free agent at the end of the season.

    Even though Green bombed in the WCF, I thought the Spurs definitely needed to extend the QO and should look to sign him to a reasonable contract over ~3 seasons. He's a solid rotation player who the Spurs may be able to lock up for a relatively cheap price.



    In related news, the Spurs also extended a QO to Patrick Mills. I'm not sure the exact dollar amount but I believe it's around $1 million. That move is a little bit more surprising since I thought the Spurs could be going in a different direction at backup point guard. By extending the QO to Mills, that could be a sign that Mills is the player they want at backup point guard next season.

  2. #2
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Pours some cold water over the De Colo idea.

  3. #3
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Great news all around. BTW, isn't this season Neal's last contract season? If it is, that might explain the Spurs drafting a SG. Neal has been an absolute bargain, but he might be looking at a big payday when his contract is up.

  4. #4
    Veteran loveforthegame's Avatar
    My Team
    Golden State Warriors
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    18,321
    Good news about Green.

    Surprised about Mills though. That doesn't sound good for DeColo.

    So are we coming back with the same roster then?

  5. #5
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    In related news, the Spurs also extended a QO to Patrick Mills. I'm not sure the exact dollar amount but I believe it's around $1 million.
    If I'm understanding the new CBA correctly, Mills' QO was $1,085,120.

    That's not a ton of money obviously but, since it's guaranteed, the Spurs probably don't extend it unless they actually want to bring him back.

  6. #6
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    Thanks for the good news. I'm glad they both got an offer. Mills is bound to be a better back up pg than Neal. Green should return highly motivated to get back on track.

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    287
    I was never to big on shaking this roster up...the team just went to the wcf and I still believe the only reason we lost is the thunder just went on a ridiculous shooting streak...if the spurs thinks mills can be a good back up I trust their judgment

  8. #8
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Pours some cold water over the De Colo idea.
    This is a good point. The Spurs are pretty guard heavy if everyone is coming back. Between Parker, Ginboili, Green, Mills and Neal ... that's already five players who will expect minutes. Adding De Colo on top of that doesn't make much sense unless they think he'll spend the year in Austin. The other option is to move one of the players -- with Neal being the one that makes the most sense to trade.

    But yeah, the Spurs giving a QO to Mills tells me the Spurs aren't planning on De Colo being the backup point guard next season. You don't give guaranteed money to a third point guard ... especially when there is already an emergency point guard on the roster in Neal.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    I really liked what Mills did, but I just don't know about him and how he will do in the playoffs. We simply NEED guys that won't shrivel in the playoffs. Offensively or defensively, gotta stay solid on both sides of the ball.

    I do like Mills though, but not totally sure on him.

  10. #10
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Unless he's looking for something in the range of 3 years, $9 million or less, I'm hoping they just play out the QO for the season. As good as Green was this season, I want to see him do it again.

  11. #11
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Yeah - I'd rather they just play out the QO with DG too. I'm leery of him going Jaren Jackson on us.

  12. #12
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Unless he's looking for something in the range of 3 years, $9 million or less, I'm hoping they just play out the QO for the season.
    I'd be pretty comfortable at $10 million over three years. Maybe eleven. But without looking at other comparables, that's about my ceiling.

  13. #13
    Vegas Strong Darkwaters's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    7,706
    This is a good point. The Spurs are pretty guard heavy if everyone is coming back. Between Parker, Ginboili, Green, Mills and Neal ... that's already five players who will expect minutes. Adding De Colo on top of that doesn't make much sense unless they think he'll spend the year in Austin. The other option is to move one of the players -- with Neal being the one that makes the most sense to trade.
    Did somebody say Cory Joseph?

  14. #14
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    I forgot Joseph is on the team. Tbh, I expect Joseph to underwhelm in summer league and then the Spurs skip picking up his third year option. We'll see but yeah the Spurs picking up Mills' option is really bad news for Joseph. He'll have to do a lot to get that option picked up. Otherwise, he'll be going the James Anderson route.

  15. #15
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    Glad to see the FO remaining calm and not going nuts, unlike us fans.

    De Colo doesn't seem to be in the FO's plans for next year unless they invite him for Summer League or something, and that doesn't look likely due to the Olympics.

  16. #16
    Beast Mode Steve-O-Matic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    747
    Yeah - I'd rather they just play out the QO with DG too. I'm leery of him going Jaren Jackson on us.
    Bad comp. Jaren Jackson was already on the wrong side of 30 when he debuted for the Spurs. Green hasn't even hit his prime. Green may not have an All-Star ceiling, but there's little chance of him regressing given the nature of his game.

  17. #17
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Of course there's a sizeable chance of DG regressing. He's had about half a season of quality ball. He's not shown that its a lock he doesn't get worse. If you don't want to go with the JJ comparison, then I'll just compare him to RMJr.

  18. #18
    Kiwi, Advanced Stat Fan
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,146
    He was excellent for all but the OKC series, definitely worth extending QO. If some team offers 6 million a year pass, but the QO is cheap and you are ensured of that, a cheap long term deal or nothing from offering it.(If he gets a Godfather offer)

  19. #19
    Vegas Strong Darkwaters's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    7,706
    I forgot Joseph is on the team. Tbh, I expect Joseph to underwhelm in summer league and then the Spurs skip picking up his third year option. We'll see but yeah the Spurs picking up Mills' option is really bad news for Joseph. He'll have to do a lot to get that option picked up. Otherwise, he'll be going the James Anderson route.
    All these factors seems to point more and more to Denmon being a draft n' stash. Unless he has a Gary Neal-esque summer league I think the Spurs need to consider it.

  20. #20
    MVParker racm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,787
    He was excellent for all but the OKC series, definitely worth extending QO. If some team offers 6 million a year pass, but the QO is cheap and you are ensured of that, a cheap long term deal or nothing from offering it.(If he gets a Godfather offer)
    Yeah, he just cooled off at the worst time possible. Pop panicking and benching him didn't help either.

  21. #21
    Believe. Salty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    389
    Definitely feel like some people turned on him after that bad outing against OKC. He may be a streaky shooter, but the good thing is that he has plenty of time and room to develop his shot and other offensive skills (dude needs to work on that running floater if he's gonna keep on taking it). He'll always bring the most value on the defensive end, so that's why it's important to retain him.

    Max I'd go is 12m/3yrs, probably a bit too generous but w/e. It's all relative to whatever Diaw wants too, and it's important that we retain both of those guys.

  22. #22
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Glad to see that the Spurs tendered the QOs for Green and Mills. I'd guess that the Spurs will match up to something around 3yr/10M, although I hope that they can get him signed for less without him seeking other offers.

    As for Mills, I think they they let him walk once he gets any offer much over the minimum.

  23. #23
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    There is a true logjam at the guards spots with Parker, Mills, Joseph, De Colo, Denmon, Neal, Ginobili and Green. Spurs are too fine at the SF spot with Leonard and Jack so playing with a 3 guards lineup isn't a that legit options.

    Some trades to clear that logjam would made sense.
    Neal seems to be the most likely candidate to be traded. He can't really play PG and at SG, he can't expect to be more than a 3rd string SG. The Denmon draft pick might be a sign Neal will be traded . Denmon certainly won't be as good as Neal but he will fight for his roster spot of 3rd string SG.

    Spurs have some very nice financial flexibility to make a trade. For example, with a package of Bonner, Blair, Neal, Joseph and Byars, they can take up to $11.6M in salary.

  24. #24
    Good to Great hsxvvd's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,427
    Mills value might rise during the olympics... he will be carrying the load for the Boomers team and Brett Brown is running much the same offence to the Spurs, a big plus for Mills.

  25. #25
    Veteran Wild Cobra Kai's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,941
    There is a true logjam at the guards spots with Parker, Mills, Joseph, De Colo, Denmon, Neal, Ginobili and Green. Spurs are too fine at the SF spot with Leonard and Jack so playing with a 3 guards lineup isn't a that legit options.
    Jack is big and strong enough to poach minutes at the stretch four.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •