Doesn't bother me, lost to the better team at the time
Clearly it doesn't, this thread is proof
It really doesn't
I do, however, take amusement from all the triple D talks since last trade deadline being exposed as a pipedream like we all knew it was.
The fact that you're going back on 2011 to try and insight some anger from me is kind of hinting that you're a little pissed off. That and your latest thread![]()
Are you trying to convince me of this, or yourself?
Convince
I merely find the massive pipedream to collapse as humerous
![]()
s would be stupid as to decline dallas and join brooklyn instead. JJ is injury prone and done, while wallace may backfire at his team anytime, so it's basically another 2-star team like NY knicks and you can't pose no threat to them heat when you only have 2 superstars not 3
Told yall u defend your ing le. The basketball Gods smite u for your ignorance. Sure u don't overpay jjb but u keep Tyson & Jet
even if DH is traded, the magic ain't gonna trade him to another eastern team. superstars don't get traded within the same conference, educate yourselves mother ers
Teletovic and Brook?
Also this may be the best 1-2-3 punch the Nyets have since Kidd/Carter/Jefferson.
Jefferson
Meanwhile on the left coast the dreams of Laker fans are still alive:
And we got the asset to get it done:
This works.
Sessions
Richardson
Kobe (yes, at SF)
Pau
D-12
Bench: Blake, Wafer, Glock, Ebanks, Hill
![]()
Hump & Brook. Not great, but serviceable.
Agreed. Aren't they FAs?
Yes, but they should have the inside track to re-sign as they can pay them the most money.
Humphries unlikely to come back since the Nyets offered the MLE to Teletovic.
don't forget you're taking this too for this to happen
![]()
We really don't have any quick fixes, going to be a few years of fishing FAs and disgruntled players.
Pretty sure they have BR's on Hump so they dont need the MLE.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)